Optimisation of the event-based TOF filtered back-projection for online imaging in total-body J-PET

We perform a parametric study of the newly developed time-of-flight (TOF) image reconstruction algorithm, proposed for the real-time imaging in total-body Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) scanners. The asymmetric 3D filtering kernel is applied at each most likely position of electron-positron annihilation, estimated from the emissions of back-to-back γ-photons. The optimisation of its parameters is studied using Monte Carlo simulations of a 1-mm spherical source, NEMA IEC and XCAT phantoms inside the ideal J-PET scanner. The combination of high-pass filters which included the TOF filtered back-projection (FBP), resulted in spatial resolution, 1.5 times higher in the axial direction than for the conventional 3D FBP. For realistic 10-minute scans of NEMA IEC and XCAT, which require a trade-off between the noise and spatial resolution, the need for Gaussian TOF kernel components, coupled with median post-filtering, is demonstrated. The best sets of 3D filter parameters were obtained by the Nelder-Mead minimisation of the mean squared error between the resulting and reference images. The approach allows training the reconstruction algorithm for custom scans, using the IEC phantom, when the temporal resolution is below 50 ps. The image quality parameters, estimated for the best outcomes, were systematically better than for the non-TOF FBP.

[1]  M. Hazelton,et al.  Plug-in bandwidth matrices for bivariate kernel density estimation , 2003 .

[2]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  B. Jasińska,et al.  Positronium in medicine and biology , 2019, Nature Reviews Physics.

[4]  A. Gajos,et al.  Synchronization and Calibration of the 24-Modules J-PET Prototype With 300-mm Axial Field of View , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  F. Licciulli,et al.  The INSIDE project: Innovative solutions for in-beam dosimetry in hadrontherapy , 2015 .

[6]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Does OSEM achieve the lowest variance? , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Julian C. Matthews,et al.  Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: benefits of a resolution model , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[9]  Piergiorgio Cerello,et al.  Online proton therapy monitoring: clinical test of a Silicon-photodetector-based in-beam PET , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Mogens Flensted‐Jensen,et al.  GROUPS AND GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS Integral Geometry, Invariant Differential Operators, and Spherical Functions (Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Series of Monographs and Textbooks) , 1985 .

[11]  Pengcheng Hu,et al.  First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner* , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[13]  Adam Leon Kesner,et al.  The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides , 2019, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[14]  M. Palka,et al.  Novel method for hit-position reconstruction using voltage signals in plastic scintillators and its application to Positron Emission Tomography , 2014, 1407.8293.

[15]  G Baroni,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation tool for online treatment monitoring in hadrontherapy with in-beam PET: A patient study. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[16]  P Kowalski,et al.  3D TOF-PET image reconstruction using total variation regularization. , 2020, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[17]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[18]  Christophe Champion,et al.  Track structure simulation for positron emitters of medical interest. Part I: The case of the allowed decay isotopes , 2007 .

[19]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[20]  E. Stępień,et al.  Prospects and Clinical Perspectives of Total-Body PET Imaging Using Plastic Scintillators. , 2020, PET clinics.

[21]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[22]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Real-Time 3D PET Image with Pseudoinverse Reconstruction , 2020 .

[23]  M. Ter-pogossian,et al.  Experimental Assessment of the Gain Achieved by the Utilization of Time-of-Flight Information in a Positron Emission Tomograph (Super PETT I) , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Gengsheng L. Zeng,et al.  Analytic time-of-flight positron emission tomography reconstruction: two-dimensional case , 2019, Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art.

[25]  Tarn Duong,et al.  ks: Kernel Density Estimation and Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Multivariate Data in R , 2007 .

[26]  Benjamin Frisch,et al.  Time of flight positron emission tomography towards 100ps resolution with L(Y)SO: An experimental and theoretical analysis , 2013 .

[27]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Advantages of Improved Time Resolution for TOF PET at Very Low Statistics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[28]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Dominik Sankowski,et al.  Noise adaptive switching median-based filter for impulse noise removal from extremely corrupted images , 2011 .

[30]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  S. Cherry,et al.  First Cerenkov charge-induction (CCI) TlBr detector for TOF-PET and proton range verification , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  贺小红,et al.  Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs(NEMA NU2-2001) , 2003 .

[33]  W P Segars,et al.  Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom. , 2008, Medical physics.

[34]  Alexander M. Grant,et al.  NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system. , 2016, Medical physics.

[35]  F. Beekman,et al.  LaBr3:Ce and SiPMs for time-of-flight PET: achieving 100 ps coincidence resolving time , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  P. Lecoq,et al.  Pushing the Limits in Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[37]  J. S. Karp,et al.  Recent developments in time-of-flight PET , 2016, EJNMMI Physics.

[38]  C. Tsoumpas,et al.  STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2 , 2012, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[39]  LaBr3:Ce and SiPMs for time-of-flight PET , 2010 .

[40]  N. Mullani,et al.  Image improvement and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  T. Duong,et al.  Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection with unconstrained pilot bandwidth matrices , 2010 .

[42]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Victor J. Sank,et al.  POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES OF A CESIUM FLUORIDE SCINTILLATOR FOR A TIME‐OF‐FLIGHT POSITRON CAMERA , 1980, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Estimation of Spatial Resolution for 3-layer J-PET Scanner Using TOF FBP Based on Event-by-Event Approach , 2020 .

[45]  A. Gajos,et al.  Estimating relationship between the time over threshold and energy loss by photons in plastic scintillators used in the J-PET scanner , 2019, EJNMMI Physics.

[46]  M. Palka,et al.  J-PET: A New Technology for the Whole-body PET Imaging , 2017, 1710.11369.

[47]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  State of the art in total body PET , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.

[48]  A. Gajos,et al.  Evaluation of Single-Chip, Real-Time Tomographic Data Processing on FPGA SoC Devices , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  M. Palka,et al.  Test of a single module of the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators , 2014, 1407.7395.

[50]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  Sub-millimetre DOI detector based on monolithic LYSO and digital SiPM for a dedicated small-animal PET system , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  W. Moses Fundamental Limits of Spatial Resolution in PET. , 2011, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[52]  A. Gajos,et al.  Compressive sensing of signals generated in plastic scintillators in a novel J-PET instrument , 2015, 1503.05188.

[53]  Xin Wang,et al.  Fast algorithm for calculating the radiological path in fan-beam CT image reconstruction , 2016 .

[54]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Efficient 3-D TOF PET Reconstruction Using View-Grouped Histo-Images: DIRECT—Direct Image Reconstruction for TOF , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[55]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Maximum-likelihood reconstruction based on a modified Poisson distribution to reduce bias in PET , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[56]  A. Blondel,et al.  Time of flight positron emission tomography towards 100 ps resolution with L ( Y ) SO : an experimental and theoretical analysis , 2017 .

[57]  M. Palka,et al.  Time resolution of the plastic scintillator strips with matrix photomultiplier readout for J-PET tomograph , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Guido Germano,et al.  Recent Advances and Future Progress in PET Instrumentation. , 2016, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[59]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  Jens Gregor,et al.  FastPET: Near Real-Time Reconstruction of PET Histo-Image Data Using a Neural Network , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[61]  M. Ter-pogossian,et al.  Feasibility of time-of-flight reconstruction in positron emission tomography. , 1980, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  M. Palka,et al.  A novel method for the line-of-response and time-of-flight reconstruction in TOF-PET detectors based on a library of synchronized model signals , 2014, 1412.6963.

[63]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Image Reconstruction from List-Mode Data in an Emission Tomography System Having Time-of-Flight Measurements , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[64]  P. Białas,et al.  Preliminary Studies of J-PET Detector Spatial Resolution , 2017 .

[65]  Shivani,et al.  Feasibility study of the positronium imaging with the J-PET tomograph , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[66]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Implementation and validation of time-of-flight PET image reconstruction module for listmode and sinogram projection data in the STIR library , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[67]  T. Budinger Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[68]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[69]  B. Hiesmayr,et al.  Estimating the NEMA characteristics of the J-PET tomograph using the GATE package , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[70]  Kenichi Watanabe,et al.  Development of TOF-PET using Cherenkov Radiation , 2006 .

[71]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[72]  J. Karp,et al.  Rebinning and reconstruction techniques for 3D TOF-PET , 2006 .

[73]  M. Wand,et al.  Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection , 1994 .

[74]  M. Conti Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[75]  J. Smyrski,et al.  Measurement of gamma quantum interaction point in plastic scintillator with WLS strips , 2016, 1612.08571.

[76]  W. Krzemie'n,et al.  Multichannel FPGA based MVT system for high precision time (20 ps RMS) and charge measurement , 2017, 1707.03565.

[77]  J. Karp,et al.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[78]  Samuel Matej,et al.  Analytic TOF PET reconstruction algorithm within DIRECT data partitioning framework , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[79]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Application of the 4-D XCAT Phantoms in Biomedical Imaging and Beyond , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[80]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  Performance assessment of the 2 γpositronium imaging with the total-body PET scanners , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.

[81]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[82]  T. Tomitani Image Reconstruction and Noise Evaluation in Photon Time-of-Flight Assisted Positron Emission Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[83]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[84]  M. Palka,et al.  Calculation of the time resolution of the J-PET tomograph using kernel density estimation , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.