Informal Collaboration in R & D. The formation of Networks Across Organizations

A barter economy is operated by the Danish biotech community. This barter economy is significant as an 'interactional infra-structure' for the emergence and discovery of collaborative R&D venues. Norms of liberally sharing information on the frontier of research greatly enhance the efficiency of the network forma tion process. Our study documents the whole process of informally forming collaborative relations amongst companies and universities in biotech R&D. A model is developed which serves as an interpretive scheme for case studies. The patterns of collaboration depicted in this paper appear to be anarchistic and random, but we argue that these traits are somewhat 'domesticated' by com munity norms. Furthermore, in spite of its strategic importance, networking appears to be totally out of managerial purview and control. However, we suggest that these collaborative relations may in certain, often paradoxical, ways be channelled and conditioned by managerial fiat.

[1]  Kristian Kreiner The Postmodem Epoch of Organization Theory , 1992 .

[2]  Teresa M. Pavia,et al.  The Early Stages of New Product Development in Entrepreneurial High-Tech Firms , 1991 .

[3]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[4]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[5]  K. Weick Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[6]  Norman W. McGuinness,et al.  Managing the search for new product concepts: a strategic approach , 1989 .

[7]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[8]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Technology Partnerships between Larger and Smaller Firms: Some Critical Issues , 1987 .

[9]  E. Hippel Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[10]  R. Rohwer Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature , 1986 .

[11]  D Blumenthal,et al.  University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.

[12]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[13]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Industrial support of university research in biotechnology. , 1986, Science.

[14]  Price Fd,et al.  Industry and academia in collaboration: the Pfizer experience. , 1985 .

[15]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos , 1985 .

[16]  L. Smircich,et al.  Leadership: The Management of Meaning , 1982, The Journal of applied behavioral science.

[17]  A. Giddens,et al.  The Aufhebung of Social Theory@@@Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. , 1981 .

[18]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.