Concordance Between Electronic Clinical Documentation and Physicians’ Observed Behavior

Key Points Question How closely does documentation in electronic health records match the review of systems and physical examination performed by emergency physicians? Findings In this case series of 9 licensed emergency physician trainees and 12 observers of 180 patient encounters, 38.5% of the review of systems groups and 53.2% of the physical examination systems documented in the electronic health record were corroborated by direct audiovisual or reviewed audio observation. Meaning These findings raise the possibility that some physician documentation may not accurately represent actions taken, but further research is needed to assess this in more detail.

[1]  M Pringle,et al.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  Peter Basch,et al.  Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. , 2015, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  Matthias Egger,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Michael A. Barnes,et al.  Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health record , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Kenric W. Hammond,et al.  Are Electronic Medical Records Trustworthy? Observations on Copying, Pasting and Duplication , 2003, AMIA.

[6]  D. Hilfiker HEALING THE WOUNDS: A Physician Looks at His Work , 1985 .

[7]  Charlene R. Weir,et al.  Direct Text Entry in Electronic Progress Notes , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  Eric Silfen,et al.  Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record. , 2006, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  Enrico W. Coiera,et al.  Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic review , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Accuracy and Quality in the Nursing Documentation of Pressure Ulcers: A Comparison of Record Content and Patient Examination , 2004, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[11]  Michael M. Wagner,et al.  Review: Accuracy of Data in Computer-based Patient Records , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2018; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; and Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program. Final rule. , 2017, Federal register.