Histologic response of porcine collagen-coated and uncoated polypropylene grafts in a rabbit vagina model.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether the host tissue response in the rabbit vagina differs for 2 synthetic graft materials that are used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. STUDY DESIGN One strip of porcine collagen-coated or uncoated polypropylene mesh was implanted adjacent to a sham operative site into the posterior vagina of 10 New Zealand white rabbits and harvested 12 weeks later. Rabbits were assigned randomly to group 1 (coated; n = 5), group 2 (uncoated; n = 5), or group 3 (unoperated; n = 4). Full-thickness sagittal sections of posterior vaginal wall and rectum were scored for inflammation, neovascularization, and fibroblastic proliferation. RESULTS Erosion of grafts did not occur in any animal. Coated and uncoated meshes induced a mild inflammatory response with minimal fibrosis and good host tissue incorporation within the grafts. Few apoptotic and proliferating cells were seen for both graft types. CONCLUSION Both coated and uncoated polypropylene meshes elicit a mild foreign body reaction and minimal fibrotic response without evidence of vaginal epithelial erosion.

[1]  G. Holt,et al.  Soft-tissue response to synthetic biomaterials. , 1994, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[2]  N. Kohli,et al.  Use of synthetic mesh and donor grafts in gynecologic surgery. , 2001, Current women's health reports.

[3]  U Klinge,et al.  Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[4]  J. Colling,et al.  Epidemiology of Surgically Managed Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  C. Birch.  The use of prosthetics in pelvic reconstructive surgery. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[6]  N. Ziats,et al.  In vitro and in vivo interactions of cells with biomaterials. , 1988, Biomaterials.

[7]  B. Klosterhalfen,et al.  Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  L. Brubaker,et al.  The fate of rectus fascia suburethral slings. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  K. Leslie,et al.  Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. Morse,et al.  Changes in tensile strength of cadaveric human fascia lata after implantation in a rabbit vagina model. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[11]  M. Karram,et al.  Scientific basis for use of grafts during vaginal reconstructive procedures , 2005, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[12]  A. Morse,et al.  Histologic evaluation of human cadaveric fascia lata in a rabbit vagina model , 2006, International Urogynecology Journal.

[13]  R. Muller,et al.  An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh , 2005, International Urogynecology Journal.

[14]  Severe Mesh Complications Following Intravaginal Slingplasty , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  Renaud de Tayrac,et al.  Collagen-coated vs noncoated low-weight polypropylene meshes in a sheep model for vaginal surgery. A pilot study , 2007, International Urogynecology Journal.

[16]  E. Myers,et al.  Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.