Applying a problem-solving scenario in risk communication of low probability events

ABSTRACT This study proposes a problem-solving scenario approach to enhance risk communication of low probability events, and aims to understand the effects of such an approach. An experiment was conducted in order to understand the comparative effects of presenting a casualty case with photos and demonstrating a problem scenario via an animation of participants’ anticipated responses to a simulated life-or-death choice. Forty-eight and 55 valid samples were collected respectively for two groups of participants. The results reveal a higher proportion of appropriate responses in the group presented with a problem scenario. Gender difference is found in the group exposed to a problem scenario - a larger percentage of males appear to respond more appropriately when presented with a life-threatening scenario without having being told what has happened. Having the ability to drive an automobile, which is presumably relevant to participants’ responses in a scenario associated with driving, does not, however, appear to differ significantly between the groups. The finding suggests that using a problem-solving scenario approach, compared with merely offering potential consequences of risks is more effective in stimulating appropriate responses to prevent casualty for information users.

[1]  S. Arora-Jonsson,et al.  Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change , 2011 .

[2]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  The Ostrich Paradox: Why We Underprepare for Disasters , 2017 .

[3]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  Human responses to climate change : flooding experiences in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[4]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Risk Area Accuracy and Hurricane Evacuation Expectations of Coastal Residents , 2006 .

[5]  Hidekazu Yoshikawa,et al.  Study on risk communication by using Web system for the social consensus toward HLW final disposal , 2008 .

[6]  Thomas Plümper,et al.  The Gendered Nature of Natural Disasters: The Impact of Catastrophic Events on the Gender Gap in Life Expectancy, 1981–2002 , 2007 .

[7]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications , 1989 .

[8]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[10]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  What Do We Know About Making Risk Comparisons , 1990 .

[11]  Chiung Ting Chang,et al.  A preliminary study on mortality attributed to tropical cyclones in Taiwan 2000–2014 , 2016 .

[12]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effects of maps and warning messages on how publics respond to disaster information , 2017 .

[13]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  D M DeJoy,et al.  An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Julie L. Demuth,et al.  Understanding Public Hurricane Evacuation Decisions and Responses to Forecast and Warning Messages , 2016 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  What Should We Know About Making Risk Comparisons?1 , 1990 .

[18]  Katherine E. Rowan,et al.  Goals, obstacles, and strategies in risk communication: A problem‐solving approach to improving communication about risks , 1991 .

[19]  W. Viscusi,et al.  5. Risk-Dollar Tradeoffs, Risk Perceptions, and Consumer Behavior , 1987 .

[20]  Amit Shahar,et al.  Risk perception of driving as a function of advanced training aimed at recognizing and handling risks in demanding driving situations. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Anna Trakoli,et al.  Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks , 2015 .

[22]  J. Barclay,et al.  Risk communication films: Process, product and potential for improving preparedness and behaviour change , 2017 .