Chromatic shift in multicolour confocal microscopy

Multicolour confocal microscopy has proven to be a successful technique for the analysis of the spatial relationship between different biological structures in the same preparation. However, when the positions of objects are compared, e.g. co‐localization and distance measurements, any positional shift that arises between the colour components is clearly unacceptable. This paper presents a simple technique for measuring with high accuracy the positional shifts that occur between the colour components of an image. Multi‐labelled microbeads were scanned using two or three different detection channels. The position of each microbead was calculated separately for each detection channel. In general, the two calculated positions of the same microbead (one for each channel) are slightly different. This difference is a measure of the positional shift between the colours. This method enables the measurement of shift with a high accuracy (20 nm), and it has been applied to images from several experiments. The results of these experiments will give the reader an impression of typical contributions of different effects (such as chromatic aberration, misalignment of optical components and inaccuracy of the scanning unit) on the amount of positional shift.

[1]  B. Ulfhake,et al.  Computerized quantification of immunofluorescence-labeled axon terminals and analysis of co-localization of neurochemicals in axon terminals with a confocal scanning laser microscope. , 1990, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[2]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[3]  Kjell Carlsson,et al.  The influence of specimen refractive index, detector signal integration, and non‐uniform scan speed on the imaging properties in confocal microscopy , 1991 .

[4]  Alan Boyde,et al.  Chromatism and confocality in confocal microscopes , 1992 .

[5]  G J Brakenhoff,et al.  Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the S-phase, analysed by double labelling of DNA and confocal microscopy. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[6]  Mark D. Fricker,et al.  Wavelength considerations in confocal microscopy of botanical specimens , 1992 .

[7]  S. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index , 1993 .

[8]  Martin W. Wessendorf,et al.  Multicolor Fluorescence Microscopy Using the Laser-Scanning Confocal Microscope , 1993 .

[9]  Kjell Carlsson,et al.  Confocal scanning microfluorometry of dual-labelled specimens using two excitation wavelengths and lock-in detection technique , 1993 .

[10]  J. Aten,et al.  Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  K. Carlsson,et al.  Simultaneous confocal recording of multiple fluorescent labels with improved channel separation , 1994, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  K Carlsson,et al.  Improved fluorophore separation with IMS confocal microscopy , 1995, Neuroreport.

[13]  A Patwardhan,et al.  Three‐colour confocal microscopy with improved colocalization capability and cross‐talk suppression , 1996 .

[14]  H. Vrolijk,et al.  Effect of chromatic errors in microscopy on the visualization of multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1996, Cytometry.

[15]  J. Aten,et al.  Dynamic behavior of DNA replication domains. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[16]  J Strackee,et al.  Largest contour segmentation: a tool for the localization of spots in confocal images. , 1996, Cytometry.