Revisiting How and Why Educators Use Twitter: Tweet Types and Purposes in #Edchat

Abstract This study revisits the Carpenter and Krutka survey of how and why educators use Twitter, through exploring one of Twitter’s oldest education hashtags: #Edchat. From October 1, 2017, to June 5, 2018, more than 1.2 million unique #Edchat tweets were collected from approximately 200,000 different tweeters. Machine coding was used to answer “What types of tweets did users contribute to #Edchat?” and human coding to answer “What purposes are observable in these tweets?” The results showed that #Edchat has been used effectively for exploring ideas but underutilized for sharing emotions—with mixed results for capitalizing on the advantages of Twitter’s online environment. Further research is required to explore combating teacher isolation and experiencing a sense of camaraderie. Taking into account these results, practitioners should be clear regarding their goals for Twitter education hashtag use when considering #Edchat, and researchers studying different education hashtags should keep in mind various tweet types, modes, and purposes. (Keywords: Twitter, hashtag, affinity space, social media, teacher)

[1]  P. Wesely.  Investigating the Community of Practice of World Language Educators on Twitter , 2013 .

[2]  Daniel G. Krutka,et al.  How and Why Educators Use Twitter: A Survey of the Field , 2014 .

[3]  Fei Gao,et al.  Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Lan Li,et al.  Examining a one-hour synchronous chat in a microblogging-based professional development community , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  S. Herring,et al.  Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Virginia G. Britt.  “Beyond the four walls of my building”: A case study of #Edchat and the power of connectedness , 2015 .

[7]  Jung Won Hur,et al.  Teacher Participation in Online Communities , 2009 .

[8]  Andrea Forte,et al.  Grassroots Professional Development: How Teachers Use Twitter , 2012, ICWSM.

[9]  Stacey Kerr,et al.  Teacher Twitter Chats: Gender Differences in Participants' Contributions , 2018, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.

[10]  M. Rehm,et al.  Twitter as an informal learning space for teachers!?: The role of social capital in Twitter conversations among teachers , 2016 .

[11]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[12]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Facebook as a Research Tool in the Social and Computer Sciences , 2016 .

[13]  Virginia G. Britt,et al.  “Beyond the Four Walls of My Building”: A Case Study of #Edchat as a Community of Practice , 2016 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[15]  Victoria I. Marín,et al.  What do U.S. and Spanish pre-service teachers think about educational and professional use of Twitter? A comparative study , 2016 .

[16]  H. Risser.  Virtual induction: A novice teacher's use of Twitter to form an informal mentoring network , 2013 .

[17]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter , 2009 .

[18]  Yimin Chen,et al.  The Role of Online Reputation Management, Trolling, and Personality Traits in the Crafting of the Virtual Self on Social Media , 2016 .

[19]  Ryan D. Visser,et al.  #TwitterforTeachers: The Implications of Twitter as a Self-Directed Professional Development Tool for K–12 Teachers , 2014 .

[20]  Joshua M. Rosenberg,et al.  An investigation of State Educational Twitter Hashtags (SETHs) as affinity spaces , 2016 .

[21]  Tian Luo,et al.  Examining Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Microblogging-Based Learning Environments , 2017, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[22]  Dhiraj Murthy,et al.  The Ontology of Tweets: Mixed-Method Approaches to the Study of Twitter , 2016 .

[23]  Raymond M. Lee,et al.  The SAGE handbook of online research methods , 2008 .

[24]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[25]  Holly Marich,et al.  Educating Social Scholars: Examining Novice Researchers’ Practices with Social Media , 2017 .

[26]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Iolanda Garcia,et al.  Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review , 2016 .

[28]  Claudine Bonneau,et al.  Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research , 2017 .

[29]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Distilling Digital Traces: Computational Social Science Approaches to Studying the Internet , 2008 .

[30]  Lara L. Lomicka,et al.  Twitter as a tool to promote community among language teachers , 2014 .

[31]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Institutional Uses of Twitter in U.S. Higher Education , 2016, Innovative Higher Education.

[32]  Ashlee Humphreys.  Social Media: Enduring Principles , 2015 .

[33]  Kerry Davis,et al.  Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  Iolanda Garcia,et al.  Properties of Teacher Networks in Twitter: Are They Related to Community-Based Peer Production? , 2017 .

[35]  Gina Masullo Chen,et al.  Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .