Resistance to Change Concerning Use of Educational Online Technologies in Blended Tertiary Environments

The rapid emergence, adoption and demand for educational online technologies (EOTs) has engendered significant advances across the higher education sector. Traditional learning spaces have evolved into dynamic blended tertiary environments (BTEs), providing a modern means through which tertiary education institutes (TEIs) can augment delivery to meet stakeholder needs. Despite the significant growth and demand for web-enabled learning, considerable obstacles face key stakeholders concerning the adoption and use of EOTs. These obstacles challenge the continued success and sustainability of blended implementations in higher education. Resistance to change was identified as one of these challenges during interviews with 13 blended learning experts from New Zealand, Australia and Canada. This paper discusses this issue as it relates to EOT usage, how it is demonstrated, and the extent to which it impacts on key stakeholders. As technology advances and usage accelerates, it is important for TEIs to understand and address this issue, and provide support for the effective use of EOTs. As TEIs keep pace with digital advancements, the outcomes of this study will enable them to design relevant approaches to tackle the issue of resistance to change as it relates to EOT usage, and deliver meaningful support to key stakeholders in BTEs.

[1]  Davison M. Mupinga,et al.  The Learning Styles, Expectations, and Needs of Online Students , 2006 .

[2]  Z. Berge,et al.  Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study , 2005 .

[3]  D. Bolliger,et al.  Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education , 2009 .

[4]  Susan Ko,et al.  Teaching Online: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[5]  Jo McKenzie,et al.  Student use of technologies for learning - what has changed since 2010? , 2014 .

[6]  Ramon Garrote Jurado,et al.  Barriers to innovation in online pedagogy , 2008 .

[7]  C. Martin 2015 , 2015, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[8]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2013 .

[9]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  Fundamentals of Qualitative Research , 2011 .

[10]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. , 2010 .

[11]  C. Dziuban,et al.  Blended learning: A dangerous idea? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Bao Huynh,et al.  Increasing demands and changing institutional research roles: How technology can help , 2009 .

[14]  Sanjaya Mishra,et al.  E‐Learning in a Mega Open University: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators , 2007 .

[15]  Mike Moore,et al.  Handbook of Distance Education : Second Edition , 2013 .

[16]  D. Nicholls,et al.  Qualitativeresearch: Partthree-Methods , 2008 .

[17]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2015 .

[18]  Eilif Trondsen,et al.  Learning on Demand , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  Chris Chapleo,et al.  Stakeholder analysis in higher education , 2010 .

[20]  N. Vaughan Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education , 2007 .

[21]  Harrison Rainie The Future of the Internet , 2008 .

[22]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Who is Responsible for E-Learning Success in Higher Education? A Stakeholders' Analysis , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Qualitative Research from Start to Finish , 2010 .

[24]  Don Passey Inclusive Technology Enhanced Learning: Overcoming Cognitive, Physical, Emotional, and Geographic Challenges , 2013 .