Aeroacoustic Numerical Method Assessment for a Double Stream Nozzle

Industrial results obtained from different steady and unsteady numerical and analytical methods for a double stream jet in confluent flow configuration are presented. These results are compared with measurements from anechoic wind tunnel tests of a model nozzle. The test campaign was conducted in the ONERA CEPRA19 facility, and exhaust parameters are representative of take-off, with and without simulated flight effects. During this campaign, in addition to acoustic measurements, LDV (Laser Doppler Velocimetry) technique was used in order to measure steady and unsteady aerodynamic data in several planes downstream the exhaust plane. Those data are used to assess several RANS methods (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes - steady calculation) on structured and unstructured 2D meshes using k-e turbulence model. Particularly, the effects of the refinement and of the structure of the mesh, as well as flight effects are investigated. Those data are also used to assess LES method (Large Eddy Simulations - 3D unsteady calculation) performed for the same model nozzle in confluent flow configuration, but without plug. Because results of both steady and unsteady aerodynamic calculations are usually used as inputs of acoustic prediction methods, an assessment of two different aeroacoustic prediction processes is also achieved, with different RANS calculations as input of an improvement of MGB (Mani Gliebe Balsa), and LES calculations as input of an acoustic integral method in the time domain (FfowcsWilliams and Hawkings surface integration). Particularly, flight effects and the ability of the whole aeroacoustic chain to predict them are studied.

[1]  Philip E. Morgan,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Airfoil Flows , 2003 .

[2]  D. L. Hawkings,et al.  Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion , 1969, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  Francois Vuillot,et al.  Investigation of integral surface formulations for acoustic post-processing of unsteady aerodynamic jet simulations , 2004 .

[4]  C. Bogey,et al.  Computation of the sound radiated by a 3-D jet using large eddy simulation , 2000 .

[5]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .

[6]  C. Bogey,et al.  Noise Investigation of a High Subsonic, Moderate Reynolds Number Jet Using a Compressible Large Eddy Simulation , 2003 .

[7]  James R. DeBonis,et al.  Study of the error and efficiency of numerical schemes for computational aeroacoustics , 2002 .

[8]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  LES of a High Reynolds, High Subsonic Jet: Effects of the Inflow Conditions on Flow and Noise , 2003 .

[9]  Anthoine Biancherin Simulation aéroacoustique d'un jet chaud subsonique , 2003 .

[10]  H. S. Ribner,et al.  Quadrupole correlations governing the pattern of jet noise , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Francois Vuillot,et al.  Comprehensive 3D unsteady simulations of subsonic and supersonic hot jet flow-fields , 2002 .

[12]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Large eddy simulation of a Mach 0.9 turbulent jet , 1999 .

[13]  T. Balsa,et al.  High Velocity Jet Noise Source Location and Reduction. Task 2. Theoretical Developments and Basic Experiments. , 1978 .

[14]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[15]  Gilles Rahier,et al.  Aeroacoustic integral methods, formulation and efficient numerical implementation , 2001 .

[16]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Direct Simulation Of A Mach 1.92 Jet And Its Sound Field , 1998 .

[17]  Jonathan B. Freund Turbulent jet noise: Shear noise, self-noise and other contributions , 2002 .

[18]  J. Freund Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9 , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  James R. DeBonis,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of a Turbulent Compressible Round Jet , 2002 .

[20]  Lars-Erik Eriksson,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of a Mach 0.75 Jet , 2003 .