Sustainability assessment of glucose production technologies from highly recalcitrant softwood including scavengers

The utilization of abandoned lignocellulosic residues for chemical production has a strong potential to partially substitute chemicals, which are traditionally produced from non-renewable resources. Softwood especially, with its high availability, presents a sustainable resource for the conversion to higher value-added products such as biofuels and bioplastics. In this study, we investigate mature and innovative technologies for the conversion of softwood to the platform chemical sugar from an economic and environmental perspective. We show that the conventional enzymatic hydrolysis has high economic as well as environmental burdens and that the increase of enzyme availability via a carbocation scavenger process is the key solution to overcome them. Furthermore, we present a process design based on concentrated acid hydrolysis, which is both environmentally and economically competitive compared to conventional production from sugarbeet. The low energy and raw material requirements combined with heat integration and moderate capital costs makes this technology attractive for utilization of softwood residues. This proves that lignocellulosic residues have the potential to become an important raw material in the future bioeconomy.

[1]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[2]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[3]  M. Galbe,et al.  Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. , 2001, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[4]  J. Y. Zhu,et al.  Substrate-Related Factors Affecting Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocelluloses: Our Recent Understanding , 2013, BioEnergy Research.

[5]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals , 2010 .

[6]  J. Saddler,et al.  Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and beta-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[7]  M. Galbe,et al.  Bio-ethanol--the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[8]  M. Studer,et al.  Lignin repolymerisation in spruce autohydrolysis pretreatment increases cellulase deactivation , 2015 .

[9]  Warren Mabee,et al.  Biorefining of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping: preliminary evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-products. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Integrated waste management in batch chemical industry based on multi-objective optimization , 2013, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  J. Saddler,et al.  The effect of isolated lignins, obtained from a range of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates, on enzymatic hydrolysis , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  David K. Johnson,et al.  Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.

[13]  M. Ballesteros,et al.  Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[14]  T. Clark,et al.  Steam Explosion of the Softwood Pinus Radiata with Sulphur Dioxide Addition. I. Process Optimisation , 1987 .

[15]  J. Y. Zhu,et al.  Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[16]  A. Ragauskas,et al.  Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of spruce by alkaline pretreatment at low temperature , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  M. Galbe,et al.  A review of the production of ethanol from softwood , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  Linoj Kumar,et al.  Can the same steam pretreatment conditions be used for most softwoods to achieve good, enzymatic hydrolysis and sugar yields? , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Min Zhang,et al.  Techno‐economic analysis and life‐cycle assessment of cellulosic isobutanol and comparison with cellulosic ethanol and n‐butanol , 2014 .

[20]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Sustainability assessment of succinic acid production technologies from biomass using metabolic engineering , 2016 .

[21]  A. Ragauskas,et al.  Insights into the effect of dilute acid, hot water or alkaline pretreatment on the cellulose accessible surface area and the overall porosity of Populus , 2015 .

[22]  An Overview of Factors Influencing the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks , 2000 .

[23]  J. Y. Zhu,et al.  Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[24]  Zhijian Pei,et al.  Organic solvent pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and biochemicals: A review. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Ye Sun,et al.  Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[26]  A. Corma,et al.  Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[27]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of lactic acid production from glycerol using cascade bio- and chemocatalysis , 2015 .

[28]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited , 2010 .