Detecting temporal changes in acoustic scenes: The variable benefit of selective attention

ABSTRACT Four experiments investigated change detection in acoustic scenes consisting of a sum of five amplitude‐modulated pure tones. As the tones were about 0.7 octave apart and were amplitude‐modulated with different frequencies (in the range 2–32 Hz), they were perceived as separate streams. Listeners had to detect a change in the frequency (experiments 1 and 2) or the shape (experiments 3 and 4) of the modulation of one of the five tones, in the presence of an informative cue orienting selective attention either before the scene (pre‐cue) or after it (post‐cue). The changes left intensity unchanged and were not detectable in the spectral (tonotopic) domain. Performance was much better with pre‐cues than with post‐cues. Thus, change deafness was manifest in the absence of an appropriate focusing of attention when the change occurred, even though the streams and the changes to be detected were acoustically very simple (in contrast to the conditions used in previous demonstrations of change deafness). In one case, the results were consistent with a model based on the assumption that change detection was possible if and only if attention was endogenously focused on a single tone. However, it was also found that changes resulting in a steepening of amplitude rises were to some extent able to draw attention exogenously. Change detection was not markedly facilitated when the change produced a discontinuity in the modulation domain, contrary to what could be expected from the perspective of predictive coding. HIGHLIGHTSListeners were presented with concurrent streams of amplitude‐modulated pure tones.They had to detect a change in the frequency or the shape of one of these modulations.Pre‐cues orienting selective attention were much more advantageous than post‐cues.Steepenings of amplitude rises had a limited ability to draw attention exogenously.

[1]  R. Patterson,et al.  The responses of single units in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig to damped and ramped sinusoids , 2000, Hearing Research.

[2]  Melissa K. Gregg,et al.  The importance of semantics in auditory representations , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Joel S. Snyder,et al.  Change deafness and object encoding with recognizable and unrecognizable sounds , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Maria Chait,et al.  Neural dynamics of change detection in crowded acoustic scenes , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The sound of a sinusoid: Time‐interval models , 1994 .

[6]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[7]  Patrick Susini,et al.  A robust asymmetry in loudness between rising- and falling-intensity tones , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Prioritizing spatial accuracy in high-resolution fMRI data using multivariate feature weight mapping , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[9]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Discrimination of wideband noises modulated by a temporally asymmetric function , 1995 .

[10]  Yoichi Sugita,et al.  Auditory search asymmetry between pure tone and temporal fluctuating sounds distributed on the frontal-horizontal plane , 2003 .

[11]  Alexandra Bendixen,et al.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  Brice Bathellier,et al.  Temporal asymmetries in auditory coding and perception reflect multi-layered nonlinearities , 2016, Nature Communications.

[13]  Yi Shen,et al.  Investigating temporal asymmetry using masking period patterns and models of peripheral auditory processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Thomas Baer,et al.  A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness , 1997 .

[15]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Prediction of absolute thresholds and equal-loudness contours using a modified loudness model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R A Kinchla,et al.  Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Auditory looming perception in rhesus monkeys , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Asif A Ghazanfar,et al.  Looming Biases in Monkey Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Claude Alain,et al.  Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  L. Demany,et al.  Auditory attention is divisible: segregated tone streams can be tracked simultaneously. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  David Poeppel,et al.  Human Screams Occupy a Privileged Niche in the Communication Soundscape , 2015, Current Biology.

[22]  M. Chait,et al.  Detection of Appearing and Disappearing Objects in Complex Acoustic Scenes , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Central auditory onset responses, and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception , 2002, Hearing Research.

[24]  A R Palmer,et al.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to stimuli producing psychophysical enhancement. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  E. Schröger,et al.  Temporal regularity facilitates higher‐order sensory predictions in fast auditory sequences , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Oculomotor capture by transient events: a comparison of abrupt onsets, offsets, motion, and flicker. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[27]  P. Heil,et al.  Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. II. Response strength. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  E. Young,et al.  Neural Correlates of Context-Dependent Perceptual Enhancement in the Inferior Colliculus , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The sound of a sinusoid: Spectral models , 1994 .

[30]  L. Demany,et al.  Enhancing a tone by shifting its frequency or intensity. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  J. Coull Neural Substrates of Mounting Temporal Expectation , 2009, PLoS biology.

[32]  L. Demany,et al.  Auditory Change Detection: Simple Sounds Are Not Memorized Better Than Complex Sounds , 2008, Psychological science.

[33]  Carolyn Drake,et al.  Perceptual attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Neural representations of temporally asymmetric stimuli in the auditory cortex of awake primates. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J Edworthy,et al.  Improving Auditory Warning Design: Relationship between Warning Sound Parameters and Perceived Urgency , 1991, Human factors.

[36]  D. Pressnitzer,et al.  Implicit versus explicit frequency comparisons: two mechanisms of auditory change detection. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Development and Current Status of the “Cambridge” Loudness Models , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[38]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Directed Attention Eliminates ‘Change Deafness’ in Complex Auditory Scenes , 2005, Current Biology.

[39]  D G Watson,et al.  Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  L. Demany,et al.  Frequency-shift detectors bind binaural as well as monaural frequency representations. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  L. Demany,et al.  Detecting changes in amplitude-modulation frequency: A test of the concept of excitation pattern in the temporal-envelope domain , 2005 .

[42]  E R Hafter,et al.  An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  A S Bregman,et al.  Resetting the pitch-analysis system: 1. Effects of rise times of tones in noise backgrounds or of harmonics in a complex tone , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  K. Lange Can a regular context induce temporal orienting to a target sound? , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[45]  Laurent Demany,et al.  On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[47]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  Assessing the possible role of frequency-shift detectors in the ability to hear out partials in complex tones. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[49]  M. Turatto,et al.  Change perception in complex auditory scenes , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Joel S. Snyder,et al.  Enhanced sensory processing accompanies successful detection of change for real-world sounds , 2012, NeuroImage.

[52]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  D. Irvine,et al.  The posterior field P of cat auditory cortex: coding of envelope transients. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  M. Heil,et al.  The Change-Deafness Phenomenon in Harmonic Chords , 2014 .

[55]  L. Demany,et al.  The perceptual enhancement of tones by frequency shifts , 2013, Hearing Research.

[56]  Ranmalee Eramudugolla,et al.  A dual-process account of auditory change detection. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  Melissa K. Gregg,et al.  Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  M. Chait,et al.  Detecting and representing predictable structure during auditory scene analysis , 2016, eLife.

[59]  Maria Chait,et al.  The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation , 2011, Hearing Research.