COVER CROP/DAIRY MANURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: WATER QUALITY AND SOIL SYSTEM IMPACTS

A field study was conducted to determine impacts of corn silage production systems that included a rye cover crop and application of liquid dairy manure in the spring and fall on water quality and soil characteristics. Four management systems were each replicated four times: traditional, double-crop, roll-down, and undercut. Manure was applied below the soil surface during the undercutting process; otherwise, manure was surface applied. In the roll-down system, the rye crop was flattened with a heavy roller after manure application. Rainfall was simulated within 48 h of manure application to produce runoff events. Grab samples of runoff were collected and composited for analysis. Soil samples were collected prior to treatments in the fall and spring. The roll-down system had no significant effect on water quality (sediment, nutrients, bacteria) as compared to the traditional system. While the roll-down system may require an occasional tillage operation to prevent surface compaction, it is recommended in situations where reduction of residual herbicide applications is a primary concern. The undercut system displayed evidence of a compaction layer developing below the disturbed soil layer. The undercut system reduced loadings of all nutrients, but increased losses of total suspended solids, as compared with all other systems. Mean volume of runoff from the undercut system was less than half that from any other system. Overall, the undercut system is recommended over the other systems analyzed for preventing transport of manure constituents to surface water, but should be evaluated in a complete dairy system before it is implemented by producers.

[1]  Dallas E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of messy data , 1992 .

[2]  Our Medical Biochemistry Correspondent Milk Production , 1968, Nature.

[3]  R. Maguire,et al.  Laboratory Procedures: Virginia Tech Soil Testing Laboratory , 2005 .

[4]  C. Laguë Design of a Semi-Liquid Dairy Cattle Manure Spreader/Injector , 1991 .

[5]  H. Porter,et al.  Soil survey of Montgomery County, Virginia , 1985 .

[6]  K. H. Hartge,et al.  Bulk Density , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[7]  I. J. Ross,et al.  Quality of Runoff from Land Receiving Surface Application and Injection of Liquid Dairy Manure , 1979 .

[8]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[9]  David M. Hershfield,et al.  Rainfall frequency atlas of the United States for durations from 30 minutes to 24 hours and return periods from 1 to 100 years , 1961 .

[10]  Daniel B. Taylor,et al.  Whole farm systems research: An integrated crop and livestock systems comparison study , 1994 .

[11]  N. P. Woodruff,et al.  Performance of Tillage Implements in a Stubble Mulch System. I. Residue Conservation 1 , 1965 .

[12]  John Wilkinson,et al.  IRRIGATION , 2000, The Wind Shifts.

[13]  Ann Lehman,et al.  JMP start statistics : a guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP , 2012 .

[14]  J. M. Laflen,et al.  Effects of Tillage on Soil Erosion in a Wheat-Fallow Rotation , 1983 .

[15]  J. Kern Water Quality Impacts of Cover Crop/Manure Management Systems , 1997 .

[16]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[17]  Edward McKyes,et al.  Design and Performance of a Liquid Manure Injector , 1978 .

[18]  L. Safley Best management practices for livestock production , 1994 .