Brain age gap in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and multiple sclerosis

Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of deep learning-derived brain age prediction in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) relative to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods This cohort study used data retrospectively collected from 6 tertiary neurological centres in China between 2009 and 2018. In total, 199 patients with NMOSD and 200 patients with RRMS were studied alongside 269 healthy controls. Clinical follow-up was available in 85 patients with NMOSD and 124 patients with RRMS (mean duration NMOSD=5.8±1.9 (1.9–9.9) years, RRMS=5.2±1.7 (1.5–9.2) years). Deep learning was used to learn ‘brain age’ from MRI scans in the healthy controls and estimate the brain age gap (BAG) in patients. Results A significantly higher BAG was found in the NMOSD (5.4±8.2 years) and RRMS (13.0±14.7 years) groups compared with healthy controls. A higher baseline disability score and advanced brain volume loss were associated with increased BAG in both patient groups. A longer disease duration was associated with increased BAG in RRMS. BAG significantly predicted Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening in patients with NMOSD and RRMS. Conclusions There is a clear BAG in NMOSD, although smaller than in RRMS. The BAG is a clinically relevant MRI marker in NMOSD and RRMS.

[1]  Ayisha Al Busaidi,et al.  Accurate brain‐age models for routine clinical MRI examinations , 2022, NeuroImage.

[2]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  An uncertainty-aware, shareable, and transparent neural network architecture for brain-age modeling , 2021, Science advances.

[3]  Carlos A. Silva,et al.  On the Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities. , 2020, Radiology. Artificial intelligence.

[4]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  Longitudinal Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis with the Brain‐Age Paradigm , 2020, Annals of neurology.

[5]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Accurate brain age prediction with lightweight deep neural networks , 2019, bioRxiv.

[6]  Lloyd T. Elliott,et al.  Brain aging comprises many modes of structural and functional change with distinct genetic and biophysical associations , 2019, bioRxiv.

[7]  Wiro J Niessen,et al.  Gray Matter Age Prediction as a Biomarker for Risk of Dementia , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Annchen R. Knodt,et al.  Brain-age in midlife is associated with accelerated biological aging and cognitive decline in a longitudinal birth cohort , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  Ke Li,et al.  Predicting Brain Age Based on Spatial and Temporal Features of Human Brain Functional Networks , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  David Bonekamp,et al.  Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[11]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[12]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Eyal Oren,et al.  Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2017, The Lancet. Neurology.

[14]  Thomas Thesen,et al.  Structural brain changes in medically refractory focal epilepsy resemble premature brain aging , 2017, Epilepsy Research.

[15]  Wei Liu,et al.  Longitudinal test-retest neuroimaging data from healthy young adults in southwest China , 2017, Scientific Data.

[16]  Giovanni Montana,et al.  Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker , 2016, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Mandler,et al.  Central Nervous System Idiopathic Inflammatory Demyelinating Disorders in South Americans: A Descriptive, Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  A. Traboulsee,et al.  International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders , 2015, Neurology.

[19]  Kuncheng Li,et al.  Differential patterns of spinal cord and brain atrophy in NMO and MS , 2015, Neurology.

[20]  Robert Leech,et al.  Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[21]  H. Cai,et al.  Optimal Caliper Width for Propensity Score Matching of Three Treatment Groups: A Monte Carlo Study , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  C. Rowe,et al.  The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[23]  H. Kearney,et al.  The patient knows best: significant change in the physical component of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 physical) , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[24]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Normalization of cerebral volumes by use of intracranial volume: implications for longitudinal quantitative MR imaging. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  G. Serio,et al.  Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of multiple sclerosis course with a validated method to assess clinical events. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.