Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach.

BACKGROUND Cluster randomized trials increasingly are being used in health services research and in primary care, yet the majority of these trials do not account appropriately for the clustering in their analysis. OBJECTIVES We review the main implications of adopting a cluster randomized design in primary care and highlight the practical application of appropriate analytical techniques. METHODS The application of different analytical techniques is demonstrated through the use of empirical data from a primary care-based case study. CONCLUSION Inappropriate analysis of cluster trials can lead to the presentation of inaccurate results and hence potentially misleading conclusions. We have demonstrated that adjustment for clustering can be applied to real-life data and we encourage more routine adoption of appropriate analytical techniques.

[1]  J M Bland,et al.  Trials which randomize practices I: how should they be analysed? , 1998, Family practice.

[2]  Allan Donner,et al.  Some aspects of the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials , 2002 .

[3]  P. Burton,et al.  Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: an introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi-level mixed modelling. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  C. Ham.  Health services research methods: a guide to best practice , 2000 .

[5]  S. Kelder,et al.  Statistical design of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH): implications of cluster randomization. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Choosing an Appropriate Unit of Analysis in Trials of Interventions That Attempt to Influence Practice , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  M. Underwood,et al.  Cluster randomization: a trap for the unwary. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  J M Bland,et al.  Trials which randomize practices II: sample size. , 1998, Family practice.

[9]  G. Moon,et al.  Context, composition and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[10]  M K Campbell,et al.  Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement , 1998, BMJ.

[11]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[12]  Nick Steen,et al.  Sample Size Calculations for Cluster Randomised Trials , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[13]  A Donner,et al.  Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  J M Bland,et al.  Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters , 1998, BMJ.

[15]  Q. Whiting-O'Keefe,et al.  Choosing the Correct Unit of Analysis in Medical Care Experiments , 1984, Medical care.