Cause and Effect Theories of Attention: The Role of Conceptual Metaphors

Scientific concepts are defined by metaphors. These metaphors determine what attention is and what count as adequate explanations of the phenomenon. The authors analyze these metaphors within 3 types of attention theories: (a) “cause” theories, in which attention is presumed to modulate information processing (e.g., attention as a spotlight; attention as a limited resource); (b) “effect” theories, in which attention is considered to be a by-product of information processing (e.g., the competition metaphor); and (c) hybrid theories that combine cause and effect aspects (e.g., biased-competition models). The present analysis reveals the crucial role of metaphors in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and the efforts of scientists to find a resolution to the classic problem of cause versus effect interpretations.

[1]  K. K. Harnishfeger,et al.  The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence , 1995 .

[2]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and Cognitive Deficits , 1982 .

[3]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[4]  B. Baars.  In the theater of consciousness : the workspace of the mind , 1997 .

[5]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of visual attention , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[7]  P. Wachtel,et al.  Conceptions of broad and narrow attention. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  M. Just,et al.  Graded Functional Activation in the Visuospatial System with the Amount of Task Demand , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Zeman.  Attentional Processing. The Brain's Art of Mindfulness , 1996 .

[10]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Two Modulatory Effects of Attention That Mediate Object Categorization in Human Cortex , 1997, Science.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Coles,et al.  Energetics and Human Information Processing , 1986 .

[15]  Sandra E. Trehub,et al.  Aging and cognitive processes , 1982 .

[16]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[17]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Microsaccadic eye movements and firing of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Gibbs.  The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[21]  R. Klein,et al.  Assessing the evidence for novel popout. , 1996 .

[22]  M. Kinsbourne.  Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  The Concept of Energy in Psychological Theory , 1986 .

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[26]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Naturalistic action production following right hemisphere stroke , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[28]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Attention Metaphors: How Metaphors Guide the Cognitive Psychology of Attention , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition: Final comments , 1995 .

[30]  Robbie Case,et al.  Intellectual development : birth to adulthood , 1985 .

[31]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[32]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[33]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and cognitive deficits : The role of attentional resources , 1982 .

[34]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[35]  S. Rose.  Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[36]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[37]  P. Schwartzkroin,et al.  Neural mechanisms. , 1994, Science.

[38]  D. Dennett,et al.  The Nature of Consciousness , 2006 .

[39]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[40]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[41]  M. Posner.  Attention: the mechanisms of consciousness. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  The Deployment of Visual Attention in the Intact Field of Hemineglect Patients , 1990, Cortex.

[43]  Mark Rowlands,et al.  The body in mind , 1999 .

[44]  J. Wolfe.  Resolving perceptual ambiguity , 1996, Nature.

[45]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  N Moray,et al.  Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[49]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention: The Relation of Macrostructure to Microstructure in Parietal Neglect , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[54]  M. Farah.  Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique of the "locality" assumption. , 1994 .

[55]  M Seyal,et al.  Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[56]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[58]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[59]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[60]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[62]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[63]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[64]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[65]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .