Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses

Aseptic loosening of the prosthesis is still a problem in artificial joint implants. The loosening can be caused by, among other factors, resorption of the bone surrounding the prosthesis owing to stress shielding. In order to find out the influence of the prosthesis type on post-operative stress shielding, a static finite element analysis of a femur provided with the conventional uncemented stem BICONTACT and of one with the femoral neck prosthesis SPIRON was carried out. Strain energy densities and maximal principal strain distributions were calculated and compared with the physiological situation. Here, stress shielding was demonstrated in both periprosthetic femora. To determine the areas of the stress shielding, the bone in each FE model was subdivided into three regions of interest (ROI): proximal, diaphyseal, and distal. The numerical computations show stress shielding in the proximal ROI of both periprosthetic femora. Diaphyseally, the femoral neck prosthesis SPIRON, in contrast to the conventional uncemented long-stem prosthesis BICONTACT, causes no decrease in the strain distribution and thus no stress shielding. Distally, no change in the load distribution of either periprosthetic femur could be found, compared with the physiological situation.

[1]  E. Schneider,et al.  Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  C Kranz,et al.  [Effects of hollow shaft endoprosthesis on stress distribution in cortical bone]. , 1990, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[3]  R Huiskes,et al.  The role of an effective isotropic tissue modulus in the elastic properties of cancellous bone. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Katz,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cortical bone--II. Measurements of elastic properties and microhardness. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: Finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  P R Fernandes,et al.  A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Sk Senapati,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS : AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR PROSTHESES DESIGN , 2004 .

[8]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  Load-shift--numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Mel S. Lee,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study. , 2005, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[10]  Ching-Lung Tai,et al.  Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral prosthesis. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  A. Yettram,et al.  Cancellous bone stresses surrounding the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: an elastic-plastic finite element analysis. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  M. Warner,et al.  Bone Remodelling of a Proximal Femur with the Thrust Plate Prosthesis: An In Vitro Case , 2004, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[13]  H Weinans,et al.  Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  M Viceconti,et al.  The muscle standardized femur: A step forward in the replication of numerical studies in biomechanics , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  Matthew J. Silva,et al.  Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam theory correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Stress analysis of the proximo-medial femur after total hip replacement. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[18]  M. Markel,et al.  Femoral bone adaptation to stable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs. , 2004, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[19]  M. Warner,et al.  Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  G Bergmann,et al.  Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Jan Schmitt,et al.  Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty--patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  W R Walsh,et al.  Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  Franco Marinozzi,et al.  Microtensile measurements of single trabeculae stiffness in human femur. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Dieter Weichert,et al.  Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.