Transferability of multipole charge-density parameters: application to very high resolution oligopeptide and protein structures.

Crystallography at sub-atomic resolution permits the observation and measurement of the non-spherical character of the electron density (parameterized as multipoles) and of the atomic charges. This fine description of the electron density can be extended to structures of lower resolution by applying the notion of transferability of the charge and multipole parameters. A database of such parameters has been built from charge-density analysis of several peptide crystals. The aim of this study is to assess for which X-ray structures the application of transferability is physically meaningful. The charge-density multipole parameters have been transferred and the X-ray structure of a 310 helix octapeptide Ac-Aib2-L-Lys(Bz)-Aib2-L-Lys(Bz)-Aib2-NHMe refined subsequently, for which diffraction data have been collected to a resolution of 0.82 A at a cryogenic temperature of 100 K. The multipoles transfer resulted in a significant improvement of the crystallographic residual factors wR and wR free. The accumulation of electrons in the covalent bonds and oxygen lone pairs is clearly visible in the deformation electron-density maps at its expected value. The refinement of the charges for nine different atom types led to an additional improvement of the R factor and the refined charges are in good agreement with those of the AMBER molecular modelling dictionary. The use of scattering factors calculated from average results of charge-density work gives a negligible shift of the atomic coordinates in the octapeptide but induces a significant change in the temperature factors (DeltaB approximately 0.4 A2). Under the spherical atom approximation, the temperature factors are biased as they partly model the deformation electron density. The transfer of the multipoles thus improves the physical meaning of the thermal-displacement parameters. The contribution to the diffraction of the different components of the electron density has also been analyzed. This analysis indicates that the electron-density peaks are well defined in the dynamic deformation maps when the thermal motion of the atoms is moderate (B typically lower than 4 A2). In this case, a non-truncated Fourier synthesis of the deformation density requires that the diffraction data are available to a resolution better than 0.9 A.

[1]  C. Lecomte,et al.  Modelling electrostatic potential from experimentally determined charge densities. I. Spherical-atom approximation , 1993 .

[2]  Claude Lecomte,et al.  On Building a Data Bank of Transferable Experimental Electron Density Parameters Applicable to Polypeptides , 1995 .

[3]  Philip Coppens,et al.  X-ray charge densities and chemical bonding , 1997 .

[4]  James A. Ibers,et al.  International tables for X-ray crystallography , 1962 .

[5]  Vladimir Y. Lunin,et al.  A procedure compatible with X-PLOR for the calculation of electron-density maps weighted using an R-free-likelihood approach , 1996 .

[6]  István Hargittai,et al.  Advances in molecular structure research , 1995 .

[7]  P Coppens,et al.  Comparative X-Ray and Neutron Diffraction Study of Bonding Effects in s-Triazine , 1967, Science.

[8]  C. Lecomte,et al.  Experimental electron density and electrostatic properties ofpeptides by high resolution X-ray diffraction , 1992 .

[9]  A. Brunger Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. , 1992 .

[10]  C. Lecomte,et al.  Modelling Electrostatic Potential from Experimentally Determined Charge Densities. II. Total Potential , 1997 .

[11]  F. L. Hirshfeld Can X‐ray data distinguish bonding effects from vibrational smearing? , 1976 .

[12]  Roland Wiest,et al.  Modeling fragments for the ab initio determination of electron density in polypeptides. An axperimental and theoretical approach to the electron distribution in leu-enkephalin trihydrate , 1992 .

[13]  Y. W. Yang,et al.  Net atomic charges and molecular dipole moments from spherical‐atom X‐ray refinements, and the relation between atomic charge and shape , 1979 .

[14]  Philip Coppens,et al.  Testing aspherical atom refinements on small-molecule data sets , 1978 .

[15]  S. Roe,et al.  Atomic resolution (0.83 A) crystal structure of the hydrophobic protein crambin at 130 K. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  R. Wiest,et al.  Electron distributions in peptides and related molecules. 2. An experimental and theoretical study of (Z)-N-acetyl-.alpha.,.beta.-dehydrophenylalanine methylamide , 1992 .

[17]  P. Kollman,et al.  A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char , 1993 .

[18]  Roland Wiest,et al.  Electron distributions in peptides and related molecules. Experimental and theoretical study of Leu-enkephalin trihydrate , 1994 .

[19]  L. C. Andrews,et al.  Statistics of derived intensities , 1975 .