Adversarial Uncertainty in Multi-Robot Patrol

We study the problem of multi-robot perimeter patrol in adversarial environments, under uncertainty of adversarial behavior. The robots patrol around a closed area using a nondeterministic patrol algorithm. The adversary's choice of penetration point depends on the knowledge it obtained on the patrolling algorithm and its weakness points. Previous work investigated full knowledge and zero knowledge adversaries, and the impact of their knowledge on the optimal algorithm for the robots. However, realistically the knowledge obtained by the adversary is neither zero nor full, and therefore it will have uncertainty in its choice of penetration points. This paper considers these cases, and offers several approaches to bounding the level of uncertainty of the adversary, and its influence on the optimal patrol algorithm. We provide theoretical results that justify these approaches, and empirical results that show the performance of the derived algorithms used by simulated robots working against humans playing the role of the adversary is several different settings.

[1]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[2]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Security in multiagent systems by policy randomization , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[3]  Yehuda Elmaliach,et al.  A realistic model of frequency-based multi-robot polyline patrolling , 2008, AAMAS.

[4]  Peter Stone,et al.  A multi-robot system for continuous area sweeping tasks , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[5]  Jacques Wainer,et al.  Probabilistic Multiagent Patrolling , 2008, SBIA.

[6]  Yann Chevaleyre Theoretical analysis of the multi-agent patrolling problem , 2004 .

[7]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Multi-robot perimeter patrol in adversarial settings , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Effective solutions for real-world Stackelberg games: when agents must deal with human uncertainties , 2009, AAMAS 2009.

[9]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[10]  G. Kaminka,et al.  Frequency-Based Multi-Robot Fence Patrolling , 2008 .

[11]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the multi-agent patrolling problem , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004)..

[12]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Effective solutions for real-world Stackelberg games: when agents must deal with human uncertainties , 2009, AAMAS.

[13]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  An efficient heuristic approach for security against multiple adversaries , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[14]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  Multiagent Technology Solutions for Planning in Ambient Intelligence , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[15]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  The impact of adversarial knowledge on adversarial planning in perimeter patrol , 2008, AAMAS.