Cognition in Manual Assembly

Manual assembly conducted by skilled human workers is of outstanding relevance for flexible production with high precision. Nevertheless, due to capacity limitations humans need to be supported during the working process in order to reduce mental workload and for enhancement of performance. Cognitive technical systems are able to do so by adapting the process of production to the properties of human cognitive processes which are relevant in manual assembly. During manual assembly tasks workers are confronted with various sources of information and have to switch rapidly between different tasks. The complexity of task execution can be reduced by appropriate information presentation and planning of work steps. Firstly, information processing during the working process can be supported by attentional guidance while reducing search times and accelerating assembly execution. Secondly, as there exist many possible assembly sequences for one product the optimal order of single assembly steps has to be found and interferences from previous task steps have to be minimized. The article describes two scenarios for the investigation of attention allocation as well as for the investigation of task sequences and gives a summary of results achieved so far.

[1]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[4]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[5]  Sonja Stork,et al.  A multi-dimensional measure for determining the complexity of manual assembly operations , 2009, Prod. Eng..

[6]  F. Ohl,et al.  Fallacies in behavioural interpretation of auditory cortex plasticity , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Sonja Stork,et al.  Finding Relevant Items: Attentional Guidance Improves Visual Selection Processes , 2009, USAB.

[8]  S. Monsell.  Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Marilyn Bohl,et al.  Information processing , 1971 .

[11]  Klaus Miesenberger,et al.  HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion, 5th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2009, Linz, Austria, November 9-10, 2009 Proceedings , 2009, USAB.

[12]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  HCI and Usability for Education and Work, 4th Symposium of the WG HCI&UE of the OCG Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2008, LNCS 5298 , 2008 .

[13]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Sonja Stork,et al.  The Influence of Instruction Mode on Reaching Movements during Manual Assembly , 2008, USAB.

[15]  Sonja Stork,et al.  Towards Optimal Worker Assistance: Investigating Cognitive Processes in Manual Assembly , 2008 .

[16]  J. Theeuwes.  Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.