Preferential interactions of urea with lysozyme and their linkage to protein denaturation.

The interactions involved in the denaturation of lysozyme in the presence of urea were examined by thermal transition studies and measurements of preferential interactions of urea with the protein at pH 7.0, where it remains native up to 9.3 M urea, and at pH 2.0, where it undergoes a transition between 2.5 and 5.0 M urea. The destabilization of lysozyme by urea was found to follow the linear dependence on urea molar concentration, M(u), DeltaG(u)(o)=DeltaG(w)(o)-2.1 M(u), over the combined data, where DeltaG(u)(o) and DeltaG(w)(o) are the standard free energy changes of the N right harpoon over left harpoon D reaction in urea and water, respectively. Combination with the measured preferential binding gave the result that the increment of preferential binding, deltaGamma(23)=Gamma(23)(D)-Gamma(23)(N), is also linear in M(u). A temperature dependence study of preferential interactions permitted the evaluation of the transfer enthalpy, DeltaHmacr;(2,tr)(o), and entropy, DeltaSmacr;(2,tr)(o) of lysozyme from water into urea in both the native and denatured states. These values were found to be consistent with the enthalpy and entropy of formation of inter urea hydrogen bonds (Schellman, 1955; Kauzmann, 1959), with estimated values of DeltaHmacr;(2,tr)(o)=ca. -2.5 kcal mol(-1) and DeltaSmacr;(2,tr)(o)=ca. -7.0 e.u. per site. Analysis of the results led to the conclusion that the stabilization of the denatured form was predominantly by preferential binding to newly exposed peptide groups. Combination with the knowledge that stabilizing osmolytes act by preferential exclusion from peptide groups (Liu and Bolen, 1995) has led to the general conclusion that both the stabilization and destabilization of proteins by co-solvents are controlled predominantly by preferential interactions with peptide groups newly exposed on denaturation.

[1]  Kevin L. Shaw,et al.  Linear extrapolation method of analyzing solvent denaturation curves , 2000, Proteins.

[2]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The thermodynamic mechanism of protein stabilization by trehalose. , 1997, Biophysical chemistry.

[3]  J. Wyman,et al.  LINKED FUNCTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EFFECTS IN HEMOGLOBIN: A SECOND LOOK. , 1964, Advances in protein chemistry.

[4]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  The peptide backbone plays a dominant role in protein stabilization by naturally occurring osmolytes. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[5]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Interactions of proteins with solvent components in 8 M urea. , 1981, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[6]  W. Stockmayer Light Scattering in Multi‐Component Systems , 1950 .

[7]  P. Privalov,et al.  A thermodynamic approach to the problem of stabilization of globular protein structure: a calorimetric study. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Warren,et al.  On the Refractive Indices of Aqueous Solutions of Urea , 1966 .

[9]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Light Scattering Arising from Composition Fluctuations in Multi‐Component Systems , 1950 .

[10]  G. Scatchard,et al.  Physical chemistry of protein solutions; derivation of the equations for the osmotic pressure. , 1946, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Mechanism of poly(ethylene glycol) interaction with proteins. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[12]  M. T. Watson,et al.  The Kinetics of Protein Denaturation. IV. The Viscosity and Gelation of Urea Solutions of Ovalbumin1 , 1953 .

[13]  C. Tanford Protein denaturation. , 1968, Advances in protein chemistry.

[14]  C. Pace,et al.  Urea and Guanidine Hydrochloride Denaturation of Ribonuclease , Lysozyme , & Zhymotrypsin , and @ Lactoglobulin * , 2003 .

[15]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Control of protein stability and reactions by weakly interacting cosolvents: the simplicity of the complicated. , 1998, Advances in protein chemistry.

[16]  M. Yao,et al.  How valid are denaturant-induced unfolding free energy measurements? Level of conformance to common assumptions over an extended range of ribonuclease A stability. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[17]  C. Pace,et al.  Polar group burial contributes more to protein stability than nonpolar group burial. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[18]  R. Biltonen,et al.  Studies of the chymotrypsinogen family of proteins. VII. Thermodynamic analysis of transition I of alpha-chymotrypsin. , 1969, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  S. N. Timasheff In disperse solution, "osmotic stress" is a restricted case of preferential interactions. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Protein hydration, thermodynamic binding, and preferential hydration. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[21]  E. Žerovnik,et al.  Interactions of myoglobin with urea and some alkylureas. II. Calorimetric and circular dichroic studies. , 1986, Biophysical chemistry.

[22]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  Bovine serum albumin and aqueous guanidine hydrochloride solutions. Preferential and absolute interactions and comparison with other systems. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[23]  C. Tanford,et al.  Extension of the theory of linked functions to incorporate the effects of protein hydration. , 1969, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Walter J. Hamer,et al.  Isotonic Solutions. I. The Chemical Potential of Water in Aqueous Solutions of Sodium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, Sulfuric Acid, Sucrose, Urea and Glycerol at 25°1 , 1938 .

[25]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  Deoxyribonueleate solutions: Sedimentation in a density gradient, partial specific volumes, density and refractive index increments, and preferential interactions , 1968, Biopolymers.

[26]  R. Bhat,et al.  Steric exclusion is the principal source of the preferential hydration of proteins in the presence of polyethylene glycols , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  W. Kauzmann,et al.  The Kinetics of Protein Denaturation. III. The Optical Rotations of Serum Albumin, β-Lactoglobulin and Pepsin in Urea Solutions , 1953 .

[28]  W. Jencks,et al.  THE EFFECT OF COMPOUNDS OF THE UREA-GUANIDINIUM CLASS ON THE ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT OF ACETYLTETRAGLYCINE ETHYL ESTER AND RELATED COMPOUNDS. , 1965, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  D. Laurents,et al.  pH dependence of the urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation of ribonuclease A and ribonuclease T1. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[30]  U. Hahn,et al.  Stability of recombinant Lys25-ribonuclease T1. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[31]  W. Kauzmann,et al.  The Kinetics of Protein Denaturation. I. The Behavior of the Optical Rotation of Ovalbumin in Urea Solutions1 , 1953 .

[32]  J. Lee,et al.  Measurements of preferential solvent interactions by densimetric techniques. , 1979, Methods in enzymology.

[33]  W. F. Harrington,et al.  A model for the myosin molecule. , 1960, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[34]  W. Kauzmann Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. , 1959, Advances in protein chemistry.

[35]  P. Privalov,et al.  Protein interactions with urea and guanidinium chloride. A calorimetric study. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  J. Schellman,et al.  The thermodynamics of solvent exchange , 1994, Biopolymers.

[37]  J. Schellman A simple model for solvation in mixed solvents. Applications to the stabilization and destabilization of macromolecular structures. , 1990, Biophysical chemistry.

[38]  Charles Tanford,et al.  Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules , 1961 .

[39]  N. Poklar,et al.  Solvation of β-lactoglobulin in alkylurea solutions , 1992 .

[40]  J. Schellman,et al.  Fifty years of solvent denaturation. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[41]  M. A. Lauffer,et al.  The hydration, size and shape of tobacco mosaic virus. , 1949, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  C. Tanford,et al.  Hydrogen Ion Equilibria of Lysozyme1,2 , 1954 .

[43]  C. Tanford,et al.  The solubility of amino acids, diglycine, and triglycine in aqueous guanidine hydrochloride solutions. , 1970, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  S. N. Timasheff Water as ligand: preferential binding and exclusion of denaturants in protein unfolding. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[45]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The extrapolation of light-scattering data to zero concentration. , 1959, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[46]  J. Schellman Selective binding and solvent denaturation , 1987, Biopolymers.

[47]  C. Pace,et al.  Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: Relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  D. Stigter INTERACTIONS IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS. IV. LIGHT SCATTERING OF COLLOIDAL ELECTROLYTES , 1960 .

[49]  M. Record,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of interactions between denaturants and protein surface exposed on unfolding: Interpretation of urea and guanidinium chloride m‐values and their correlation with changes in accessible surface area (ASA) using preferential interaction coefficients and the local‐bulk domain mode , 2000, Proteins.

[50]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Protein-solvent preferential interactions, protein hydration, and the modulation of biochemical reactions by solvent components , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Jan Hermans,et al.  The Stability of Globular Protein , 1975 .

[52]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Stabilization of protein structure by sugars. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[53]  The enthalpy of transfer of unfolded proteins into solutions of urea and guanidinium chloride. , 1996, Biophysical chemistry.

[54]  J. Schellman The relation between the free energy of interaction and binding , 1993 .

[55]  Interactions of myoglobin with urea and some alkylureas. I. Solvation in urea and alkylurea solutions. , 1986, Biophysical chemistry.

[56]  J. Lee,et al.  The stabilization of proteins by sucrose. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[57]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Effect of Light Scattering on Ultraviolet Difference Spectra1 , 1960 .

[58]  M. T. Watson,et al.  The Kinetics of Protein Denaturation. V. The Viscosity of Urea Solutions of Serum Albumin1 , 1953 .

[59]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Mechanism of protein salting in and salting out by divalent cation salts: balance between hydration and salt binding. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[60]  W. Kauzmann,et al.  The Kinetics of Protein Denaturation. II. The Optical Rotation of Ovalbumin in Solutions of Guanidinium Salts , 1953 .

[61]  Schellman Ja The stability of hydrogen-bonded peptide structures in aqueous solution. , 1955 .

[62]  J. Lee,et al.  Partial specific volumes and interactions with solvent components of proteins in guanidine hydrochloride. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[63]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTICOMPONENT SOLUTIONS. , 1964, Advances in protein chemistry.

[64]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[65]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Osmolyte-driven contraction of a random coil protein. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.