Relevance of the small frequency separation for asteroseismic stellar age, mass, and radius

Aims. We performed a theoretical analysis aimed at quantifying the relevance of the small frequency separation δν in determining stellar ages, masses, and radii. We aimed to establish a minimum uncertainty on these quantities for low-mass stars across different evolutionary stages of the main sequence and to evaluate the biases that come from some systematic differences between the stellar model grid adopted for the recovery and the observed stars. Methods. We adopted the Stellar CharactEristics Pisa Estimation gRid (SCEPtER) pipeline for low-mass stars, [0.7, 1.05] M⊙, from the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) to the central hydrogen depletion. For each model in the grid, we computed oscillation frequencies. Synthetic stars were generated and reconstructed based on different assumptions about the relative precision in the δν parameter (namely 5% and 2%). The quantification of the systematic errors arising from a possible mismatch between synthetic stars and the recovery grid was performed by generating stars from synthetic grids of stellar models with different initial helium abundance and microscopic diffusion efficiency. The results obtained without δν as an observable are included for comparison. Results. The investigation highlighted and confirmed the improvement in the age estimates when δν is available, which has already been reported in the literature. While the biases were negligible, the statistical error affecting age estimates was strongly dependent on the stellar evolutionary phase. The error is at its maximum at ZAMS and it decreases to about 11% and 6% (δν known at 5% and 2% level, respectively) when stars reach the 30% of their evolutionary MS lifetime. The usefulness of small frequency separation in improving age estimates vanishes in the last 20% of the MS. The availability of δν in the fit for mass and radius estimates provided an effect that was nearly identical to its effect on age, assuming an observational uncertainty of 5%. As a departure, with respect to age estimates, no benefit was detected for mass and radius determinations from a reduction of the observational error in δν to 2%. The age variability attributed to differences in the initial helium abundance resulted in negligible results owing to compensation effects that have already been discussed in previous works. On the other hand, the current uncertainty in the initial helium abundance leads to a greater bias (2% and 1% level) in mass and radius estimates whenever δν is in the observational pool. This result, together with the presence of further unexplored uncertainty sources, suggest that precision in the derived stellar quantities below these thresholds may possibly be overoptimistic. The impact of microscopic diffusion was investigated by adopting a grid of models for the recovery which totally neglected the process. The availability of the small frequency separation resulted in biases lower than 5% and 2% for observational errors of 5% and 2%, respectively. The estimates of mass and radius showed again a greater distortion when δν is included among the observables. These biases are at the level of 1%, confirming that threshold as a minimum realistic uncertainty on the derived stellar quantities. Finally, we compared the estimates by the SCEPtER pipeline for 13 Kepler asteroseismic LEGACY sample stars with those given by six different pipelines from literature. This procedure demonstrated a fair agreement for the results. The comparison suggests that a realistic approach to the determination of the error on the estimated parameters consists of approximately doubling the error in the recovered stellar characteristics from a single pipeline. Overall, on the LEGACY sample data, we obtained a multi-pipeline precision of about 4.4%, 1.7%, and 11% on the estimated masses, radii, and ages, respectively.

[1]  S. Degl'innocenti,et al.  Mixing-length calibration from field stars , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[2]  W. Chaplin,et al.  aims– a new tool for stellar parameter determinations using asteroseismic constraints , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[3]  G. Buldgen,et al.  Comprehensive stellar seismic analysis , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[4]  Conny Aerts,et al.  Deep Learning Applied to the Asteroseismic Modeling of Stars with Coherent Oscillation Modes , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[5]  G. Davies,et al.  Mean density inversions for red giants and red clump stars , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[6]  P. Morel,et al.  Impacts of radiative accelerations on solar-like oscillating main-sequence stars , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[7]  C. Aerts,et al.  Forward Asteroseismic Modeling of Stars with a Convective Core from Gravity-mode Oscillations: Parameter Estimation and Stellar Model Selection , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[8]  J. Zinn,et al.  The Second APOKASC Catalog: The Empirical Approach , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[9]  T. Campante,et al.  Asteroseismic modelling of solar-type stars: internal systematics from input physics and surface correction methods , 2018, 1804.04935.

[10]  F. Grundahl,et al.  Establishing the accuracy of asteroseismic mass and radius estimates of giant stars - I. Three eclipsing systems at [Fe/H] ∼ -0.3 and the need for a large high-precision sample , 2018, 1801.08167.

[11]  U. California,et al.  Angular momentum transport by heat-driven g-modes in slowly pulsating B stars , 2017, 1712.02420.

[12]  F. Timmes,et al.  Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics ( ): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions , 2017, 1710.08424.

[13]  D. A. García-Hernández,et al.  The First APOKASC Catalog of Kepler Dwarf and Subgiant Stars , 2017, 1710.06858.

[14]  W. Chaplin,et al.  Changing the νmax Scaling Relation: The Need for a Mean Molecular Weight Term , 2017, 1705.03472.

[15]  S. Basu,et al.  On the Statistical Properties of the Lower Main Sequence , 2017, 1703.10165.

[16]  H. R. Coelho,et al.  Determining stellar parameters of asteroseismic targets: going beyond the use of scaling relations , 2017, 1701.04791.

[17]  S. Degl'Innocenti,et al.  Statistical errors and systematic biases in the calibration of the convective core overshooting with eclipsing binaries - A case study: TZ Fornacis , 2016, 1612.07066.

[18]  H. M. Antia,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Dwarfs: the Kepler Asteroseismic LEGACY Sample. I. Oscillation Mode Parameters , 2016, 1612.00436.

[19]  H. R. Coelho,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Dwarfs: the Kepler Asteroseismic LEGACY Sample. II. Radii, Masses, and Ages , 2016, 1611.08776.

[20]  R. Deshpande,et al.  TESTING THE ASTEROSEISMIC SCALING RELATIONS FOR RED GIANTS WITH ECLIPSING BINARIES OBSERVED BY KEPLER , 2016, 1609.06645.

[21]  Saskia Hekker,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS OF MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS IN AN INSTANT WITH MACHINE LEARNING , 2016, ArXiv.

[22]  Jieun Choi,et al.  MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS , 2016, 1604.08592.

[23]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  SpaceInn hare-and-hounds exercise: Estimation of stellar properties using space-based asteroseismic data , 2016, 1604.08404.

[24]  P. Moroni,et al.  A statistical test on the reliability of the non-coevality of stars in binary systems , 2016, 1601.02892.

[25]  Travis S. Metcalfe,et al.  ASTEROSEISMIC MODELING OF 16 Cyg A & B USING THE COMPLETE KEPLER DATA SET , 2015, 1508.00946.

[26]  Dean M. Townsley,et al.  MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA): BINARIES, PULSATIONS, AND EXPLOSIONS , 2015, 1506.03146.

[27]  P. Moroni,et al.  Grid-based estimates of stellar ages in binary systems. SCEPtER: Stellar CharactEristics Pisa Estimation gRid , 2015, 1505.06413.

[28]  S. D. Kawaler,et al.  Ages and fundamental properties of Kepler exoplanet host stars from asteroseismology , 2015, 1504.07992.

[29]  P. Moroni,et al.  On the age of Galactic bulge microlensed dwarf and subgiant stars , 2015, 1503.04570.

[30]  C. Baranec,et al.  AN ANCIENT EXTRASOLAR SYSTEM WITH FIVE SUB-EARTH-SIZE PLANETS , 2015, 1501.06227.

[31]  Oxford,et al.  Confronting uncertainties in stellar physics: calibrating convective overshooting with eclipsing binaries , 2015, 1501.05322.

[32]  P. Moroni,et al.  Uncertainties in asteroseismic grid-based estimates of stellar ages: SCEPtER: Stellar CharactEristics Pisa Estimation gRid , 2014, 1412.5895.

[33]  J. Montalbán,et al.  How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models? II. The impact of asteroseismology , 2014, 1410.5337.

[34]  M. P. Di Mauro,et al.  PROPERTIES OF 42 SOLAR-TYPE KEPLER TARGETS FROM THE ASTEROSEISMIC MODELING PORTAL , 2014, 1402.3614.

[35]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Inferring properties of small convective cores in main-sequence solar-like pulsators , 2013, 1401.1832.

[36]  P. Moroni,et al.  Uncertainties in grid-based estimates of stellar mass and radius - SCEPtER: Stellar CharactEristics Pisa Estimation gRid , 2013, 1311.7358.

[37]  P. Gaulme,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Asteroseismic Fundamental Properties of Solar-type Stars Observed by the NASA , 2013 .

[38]  F. Grundahl,et al.  Benefits of multiple sites for asteroseismic detections , 2013, 1310.2845.

[39]  R. Townsend,et al.  GYRE: An open-source stellar oscillation code based on a new Magnus Multiple Shooting Scheme , 2013, 1308.2965.

[40]  William J. Chaplin,et al.  Asteroseismology of Solar-Type and Red-Giant Stars , 2013, 1303.1957.

[41]  M. H. Montgomery,et al.  MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA): PLANETS, OSCILLATIONS, ROTATION, AND MASSIVE STARS , 2013, 1301.0319.

[42]  S. Degl'Innocenti,et al.  Cumulative physical uncertainty in modern stellar models - I. The case of low-mass stars , 2012, 1211.0706.

[43]  P. Tenenbaum,et al.  VERIFYING ASTEROSEISMICALLY DETERMINED PARAMETERS OF KEPLER STARS USING HIPPARCOS PARALLAXES: SELF-CONSISTENT STELLAR PROPERTIES AND DISTANCES , 2012, 1208.6294.

[44]  G. Handler Asteroseismology , 2012, 1205.6407.

[45]  M. Pinsonneault,et al.  HOW GOOD A CLOCK IS ROTATION? THE STELLAR ROTATION–MASS–AGE RELATIONSHIP FOR OLD FIELD STARS , 2012, 1203.1618.

[46]  S. Degl'Innocenti,et al.  The Pisa Stellar Evolution Data Base for low-mass stars , 2012, 1202.4864.

[47]  T. Appourchaux,et al.  A UNIFORM ASTEROSEISMIC ANALYSIS OF 22 SOLAR-TYPE STARS OBSERVED BY KEPLER , 2012, 1202.2844.

[48]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  KEPLER-21b: A 1.6 REarth PLANET TRANSITING THE BRIGHT OSCILLATING F SUBGIANT STAR HD 179070 , 2011, 1112.2165.

[49]  William J. Chaplin,et al.  EFFECT OF UNCERTAINTIES IN STELLAR MODEL PARAMETERS ON ESTIMATED MASSES AND RADII OF SINGLE STARS , 2011, 1111.6976.

[50]  J. De Ridder,et al.  Characterization of the power excess of solar-like oscillations in red giants with Kepler , 2011, 1110.0980.

[51]  J. De Ridder,et al.  TESTING SCALING RELATIONS FOR SOLAR-LIKE OSCILLATIONS FROM THE MAIN SEQUENCE TO RED GIANTS USING KEPLER DATA , 2011, 1109.3460.

[52]  Hans Kjeldsen,et al.  CALCULATING ASTEROSEISMIC DIAGRAMS FOR SOLAR-LIKE OSCILLATIONS , 2011, 1109.3455.

[53]  S. Degl'Innocenti,et al.  The Pisa pre-main sequence tracks and isochrones - A database covering a wide range of Z, Y, mass, and age values , 2011, 1107.2318.

[54]  S. D. Kawaler,et al.  Ensemble Asteroseismology of Solar-Type Stars with the NASA Kepler Mission , 2011, Science.

[55]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF STELLAR PARAMETERS VIA ASTEROSEISMOLOGY OF STOCHASTICALLY OSCILLATING STARS: COMPARISON WITH DIRECT MEASUREMENTS , 2010, 1009.5131.

[56]  William J. Chaplin,et al.  AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF GRID-BASED ASTEROSEISMIC ANALYSIS , 2010, 1009.3018.

[57]  A. Miglio,et al.  SEISMIC DIAGNOSTICS OF RED GIANTS: FIRST COMPARISON WITH STELLAR MODELS , 2010, 1009.1754.

[58]  Frank Timmes,et al.  MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA) , 2010, 1009.1622.

[59]  Heidelberg,et al.  \Delta Y/ \Delta Z from the analysis of local K dwarfs , 2010, 1005.0245.

[60]  William J. Chaplin,et al.  DETERMINATION OF STELLAR RADII FROM ASTEROSEISMIC DATA , 2009, 0909.0506.

[61]  M. Asplund,et al.  The chemical composition of the Sun , 2009, 0909.0948.

[62]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  A STELLAR MODEL-FITTING PIPELINE FOR ASTEROSEISMIC DATA FROM THE KEPLER MISSION , 2009, 0903.0616.

[63]  M. Marconi,et al.  The FRANEC stellar evolutionary code , 2008 .

[64]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Inter-comparison of the g-, f- and p-modes calculated using different oscillation codes for a given stellar model , 2007, 0711.2587.

[65]  M. Peimbert,et al.  Revised Primordial Helium Abundance Based on New Atomic Data , 2007, astro-ph/0701580.

[66]  C. Rossi-Alvarez,et al.  S-factor of 14N(p,γ)15O at astrophysical energies⋆ , 2005, nucl-ex/0509005.

[67]  A. Montalbán,et al.  Constraining fundamental stellar parameters using seismology. Application to α Centauri AB , 2005, astro-ph/0505537.

[68]  G. Meynet,et al.  Analysis of $\alpha$ Centauri AB including seismic constraints , 2004, astro-ph/0401606.

[69]  B. Gibson,et al.  The Cosmic Production of Helium , 2003, Science.

[70]  I. Roxburgh,et al.  Diagnostics of the Internal Structure of Stars using the Differential Response Technique , 2003 .

[71]  P. Morel,et al.  Atomic diffusion in star models of type earlier than G , 2002, astro-ph/0205434.

[72]  P. Aguer,et al.  A compilation of charged-particle induced thermonuclear reaction rates , 1999 .

[73]  F. Allard,et al.  The NextGen Model Atmosphere Grid for 3000 ≤ Teff ≤ 10,000 K , 1998, astro-ph/9807286.

[74]  B.E.J. PagelL. Portinari Δ Y/Δ Z from fine structure in the main sequence based on Hipparcos parallaxes , 1997, astro-ph/9711332.

[75]  A. Loeb,et al.  Element Diffusion in the Solar Interior , 1993, astro-ph/9304005.

[76]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Solar oscillation frequencies and the equation of state , 1988, Nature.

[77]  R. K. Ulrich,et al.  Determination of stellar ages from asteroseismology , 1986 .

[78]  T. Brown Solar p-Mode Eigenfrequencies Are Decreased by Turbulent Convection , 1984, Science.

[79]  V. S. Aguirre,et al.  An attempt to calibrate core overshooting using the seismic properties of low-mass stars , 2015 .

[80]  S. D. Kawaler,et al.  University of Birmingham Asteroseismology of the solar analogs 16 Cyg A and B from Kepler observations , 2012 .