Revisiting the role of cultural distance in MNC's foreign ownership mode choice: the moderating effect of experience attributes

This study investigates potential moderating effects of firm's experience levels in the relationship between cultural distance and foreign ownership mode choice. Using the well established Japanese FDI data base, it is found that higher levels of experience, particularly decision-specific experience (prior experience with a particular ownership structure mode), mitigates potential impacts of uncertainty and costs caused by the high level of cultural distance, thus uncovering one possible answer to the 'national cultural distance paradox' reported in the literature. These findings reinforce similar findings of interaction effects between key variables and cultural distance in studies involving other important strategic decisions of the MNC. The 'decision-specific experience-moderated cultural distance' variable, and not the 'absolute cultural distance' variable, is found to be an important determinant of a firm's foreign ownership mode choice. Furthermore, this variable dominates the other experience-moderated cultural distance variables (international business experience and host county experience-moderated cultural distance variables) in the ability to discriminate between full ownership and shared ownership modes. Based on this moderated cultural distance measure, we find strong evidence that cultural distance is positively associated with full ownership of Japanese foreign manufacturing entities.

[1]  東洋経済新報社.  Japan company handbook , 1974 .

[2]  M. Erramilli,et al.  Nationality and Subsidiary Ownership Patterns in Multinational Corporations , 1996 .

[3]  J. Hennart,et al.  A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures , 1988 .

[4]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Explaining the National Cultural Distance Paradox , 2001 .

[5]  東洋経済新報社.  Japanese overseas investment : a complete listing by firms and countries , 1981 .

[6]  Klaus Uhlenbruck,et al.  Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: the experience of MNES in transition economies , 2004 .

[7]  Harry G. Barkema,et al.  Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures , 1997 .

[8]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[9]  Kang Rae Cho,et al.  Ownership Strategy for a Foreign Affiliate: An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Firms , 1996 .

[10]  M. Nyaw,et al.  A Dual Parent Perspective on Control and Performance in International Joint Ventures: Lessons From a Developing Economy , 2001 .

[11]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[12]  H. Gatignon,et al.  The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries : an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation , 1988 .

[13]  R. Dahlstrom,et al.  An exploratory investigation of interpersonal trust in new and mature market economies , 1995 .

[14]  Prasad Padmanabhan,et al.  Decision Specific Experience in Foreign Ownership and Establishment Strategies: Evidence from Japanese Firms , 1999 .

[15]  J. Hennart,et al.  The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the united states , 1991 .

[16]  Yong Suhk Pak,et al.  Global Ownership Strategy of Japanese Multinational Enterprises: A Test of Internalization Theory , 2004 .

[17]  Mario C Zejan.  New Ventures of Acquisitions. The Choice of Swedish Multinational Enterprises , 1990 .

[18]  C. P. Rao,et al.  Service Firms’ International Entry-Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach , 1993 .

[19]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[20]  Jane Lu,et al.  Intra- and Inter-organizational Imitative Behavior: Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms' Entry Mode Choice , 2002 .

[21]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries : Theory and evidence , 1989 .

[22]  M. Bond,et al.  The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth , 1988 .

[23]  M. Erramilli,et al.  Are Firm-Specific Advantages Location-Specific Too? , 1997 .

[24]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice , 1992 .

[25]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions , 1986 .

[26]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success , 2003 .

[27]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach , 1990 .

[28]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[29]  S. Shane,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Differences in Perceptions of Transaction Costs on National Differences in the Preference for Licensing , 1992 .

[30]  R. P. Hastings,et al.  SUGI supplemental library user's guide , 1986 .

[31]  Kevin Au,et al.  How MNCs Choose Entry Modes and Form Alliances: The China Experience , 1997 .

[32]  Klaus E. Meyer,et al.  Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe , 2001, Multinational Enterprises and Emerging Economies.

[33]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences , 2001 .

[34]  L. Zucker.  Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .