Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling

The use of marine controlled-source electromagnetic EM (CSEM) sounding to detect thin resistive layers at depths below the seafloor has been exploited recently to assess the resistivity of potential hydrocarbon reservoirs before drilling. We examine the sensitivity of the CSEM method to such layers with forward and inverse modeling in one and three dimensions. The 3D modeling demonstrates that if both source and receivers are over a tabular 3D target, 1D modeling predicts the observed response to very high accuracy. Experimental design can thus be based on 1D analysis in which hundreds of range and frequency combinations can be computed to find the optimal survey parameters for a given target structure. Modeling in three dimensions shows that the vertical electric-field response is largest over the edges of a 3D target. The 3D modeling also suggests that a target body needs to have a diameter twice the burial depth to be reliably seen by CSEM sounding. A simple air-wave model (energy propagating from source to receiver via the atmosphere) allows the effects of the target layer and atmosphere to be separated and shows where sensitivity to the target is diminished or lost because of finite water depth as a function of range, frequency, and seafloor resistivity. Unlike DC resistivity sounding, the marine CSEM method is not completely T-equivalent and, in principle, can resolve resistivity and thickness separately. Smooth inversion provides an estimate of the method’s resolving power and highlights the fact that although the radial CSEM fields contain most of the sensitivity to the thin resistive target, inverted alone they produce only increasing resistivity with depth. Inclusion of the radial mode CSEM data forces the recovery of the thin resistor, but magnetotelluric data can be used more effectively to achieve the same result.

[1]  Svein Ellingsrud,et al.  The Meter Reader—Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers by seabed logging (SBL): Results from a cruise offshore Angola , 2002 .

[2]  L. Cagniard Basic theory of the magneto-telluric method of geophysical prospecting , 1953 .

[3]  Lucy MacGregor,et al.  Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas , 2002 .

[4]  Steven Constable,et al.  Electrical resistivity structure of the Valu Fa Ridge, Lau Basin, from marine controlled‐source electromagnetic sounding , 2001 .

[5]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[6]  C. Cox,et al.  Atlantic Lithosphere Sounding , 1980 .

[7]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  Offshore Electromagnetic Surveying Techniques , 1986 .

[8]  R. N. Edwards,et al.  12. Electrical Exploration Methods for the Seafloor , 1991 .

[9]  P. Bannister New simplified formulas for ELF subsurface-to-subsurface propagation , 1984 .

[10]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  Controlled electromagnetic sources for measuring electrical conductivity beneath the oceans: 1. Forward problem and model study , 1982 .

[11]  R. N. Edwards,et al.  The Assessment of Marine Gas Hydrates Through Electrical Remote Sounding: Hydrate Without a BSR? , 2000 .

[12]  C. S. Cox,et al.  Marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding. 2. The PEGASUS experiment , 1996 .

[13]  Hans Erik Foss Amundsen,et al.  Subsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding , 2005 .

[14]  G. Michael Hoversten,et al.  Marine magnetotellurics for base-of-salt mapping : Gulf of Mexico field test at the Gemini structure , 2000 .

[15]  Charles S. Cox,et al.  On the electrical conductivity of the oceanic lithosphere , 1981 .

[16]  S. Johansen,et al.  Seabed logging': A possible direct hydrocarbon indicator for deepsea prospects using EM energy , 2002 .

[17]  Frank Morrison,et al.  Sharp boundary inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data , 1999 .

[18]  Anton Ziolkowski,et al.  Hydrocarbon Detection With a Multi-channel Transient Electromagnetic Survey , 2001 .

[19]  Steven Constable,et al.  Marine controlled‐source electromagnetic sounding: 1. Modeling and experimental design , 1996 .

[20]  Generalized electromagnetic seabed logging wavefield decomposition intoU /D-going components , 2004 .

[21]  F N Spiess,et al.  East Pacific Rise: Hot Springs and Geophysical Experiments , 1980, Science.

[22]  Chester J. Weiss,et al.  A matrix‐free approach to solving the fully 3D electromagnetic induction problem , 2001 .

[23]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  A hybrid fast Hankel transform algorithm for electromagnetic modeling , 1989 .

[24]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  On the theory of sea-floor conductivity mapping using transient electromagnetic systems , 1987 .

[25]  Steven Constable,et al.  Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts , 2004 .

[26]  Lucy MacGregor,et al.  Use of marine controlled‐source electromagnetic sounding for sub‐basalt exploration , 2000 .

[27]  S. Constable,et al.  Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration Part I: A sea-floor equipment system , 1998 .

[28]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Direct reservoir parameter estimation using joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data , 2005 .