The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices

This paper provides a theoretical framework for understanding why high-involvement work practices are adopted more rapidly by some organizations than others. Drawing on evolutionary economics and innovation literature, we identify three key drivers: 1) the level of complementary human resource practices and technology; 2) performance achieved with previous practices; and 3) factors that alter the cost of introducing new practices. Empirical analyses of a unique longitudinal data set of 43 automobile assembly plants worldwide provide support for hypotheses about complementary HR practices (but not complementary technologies) and partial support for hypotheses about past performance and factors that alter adoption costs.

[1]  James D. Thompson,et al.  The Regeneration of Social Organizations , 1971 .

[2]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[3]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[4]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[5]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution , 1986 .

[6]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[7]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Survivors' Reactions to Layoffs: We Get By with a Little Help for Our Friends. , 1987 .

[8]  John F Krafcik.  Comparative analysis of performance indicators at world auto assembly plants , 1988 .

[9]  A. S. Blinder.  Pay, Participation, and Productivity , 1989 .

[10]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Introduction: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation. , 1990 .

[11]  M. Aoki.  Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm , 2013 .

[12]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[14]  J. Arthur.  The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills , 1992 .

[15]  S. Mezias,et al.  The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution , 1993 .

[16]  S. Sethi,et al.  Relating strategy and structure to flexible automation: A test of fit and performance implications , 1993 .

[17]  M. Bolton,et al.  Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation? , 1993 .

[18]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[19]  Elmer H. Burack,et al.  New Paradigm Approaches in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1994 .

[20]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[21]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[22]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[23]  John Paul Paul MacDuffie.  Organizational Influences on Process Quality Improvement: Shop-Floor Problem-Solving in Auto Assembly Plants , 1996 .

[24]  S. Graves.  A multiechelon inventory model with fixed replenishment intervals , 1996 .