Influences of pellet markers on speech production behavior: acoustical and perceptual measures.

Peri- and intraoral devices are often used to obtain measurements concerning articulator motions and placements. Surprisingly, there are few formal evaluations of the potential influence of these devices on speech production behavior. In particular, the potential effects of lingual pellets or coils used in x-ray or electromagnetic studies of tongue motion have never been evaluated formally, even though a large x-ray database exists and electromagnetic systems are commercially available. The x-ray microbeam database [Westbury, J. "X-ray Microbeam Speech Production Database User's Handbook, version 1" (1994)] includes several utterances produced with pellets-off and -on, which allowed us to evaluate effects of pellets for the utterance, She had your dark suit in greasy wash water all year, using acoustic and perceptual measures. Overall, there were no acoustic or perceptual measures that showed consistent effects of pellets across speakers, but certain effects were consistent either within a given speaker or in direction across a subgroup of the speakers. The results are discussed in terms of the general goodness of the assumption that point parameterization of lingual motion does not interfere with normal articulatory behaviors. A brief screening procedure is suggested to protect articulatory kinematic experiments from those individuals who may show consistent effects of having devices placed on perioral structures.

[1]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Thomas H. Crystal,et al.  The duration of American-English vowels: an overview , 1988 .

[3]  D H McFarland,et al.  Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  N. Umeda Consonant duration in American English , 1977 .

[5]  S. Shaiman,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Joseph S. Perkell,et al.  An indirect test of the quantal nature of speech in the production of the vowels /i/, /a/ and /u/ , 1989 .

[7]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[8]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  Articulatory-Acoustic Relationships in Fricative Consonants , 1990 .

[9]  J A Kelso,et al.  Lip-larynx coordination in speech: effects of mechanical perturbations to the lower lip. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S L Hamlet,et al.  Physiological control of sibilant duration: insights afforded by speech compensation to dental prostheses. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Perkell,et al.  Variability in production of the vowels /i/ and /a/. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Control of multimovement coordination: sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  S. Wood A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels , 1979 .

[15]  D. Recasens,et al.  An Electropalatographic Study of Alveolar and Palatal Consonants in Catalan and Italian , 1993, Language and speech.

[16]  C. Bartram,et al.  Mapping of the oncogenes Myc, Sis, and int-1 to the distal part of mouse chromosome 15. , 1987, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[17]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: a pilot "motor equivalence" study. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C. Watson,et al.  Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J A Kelso,et al.  An evaluation of an alternating magnetic field device for monitoring tongue movements. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. B. Monsen,et al.  The accuracy of formant frequency measurements: a comparison of spectrographic analysis and linear prediction. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  D H McFarland,et al.  Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Raymond D. Kent Some Considerations in the Cinefluorographic Analysis of Tongue Movements during Speech , 1972, Phonetica.

[23]  D H McFarland,et al.  The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Production of bite‐block vowels: Acoustic equivalence by selective compensation , 1980 .

[26]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[27]  Pascal Perrier,et al.  Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip-tube : A study of the control space in speech production , 1995 .

[28]  Andrew Butcher,et al.  Measuring coarticulation and variability in tongue contact patterns , 1989 .

[29]  J H Abbs,et al.  Lip and jaw motor control during speech: responses to resistive loading of the jaw. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  M. Stone,et al.  Compensatory alveolar consonant production induced by wearing a dental prosthesis , 1978 .

[31]  T. Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected‐speech signals: Current results , 1988 .

[32]  N. Umeda Vowel duration in American English. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Thomas H. Crystal,et al.  The duration of American-English stop consonants: an overview , 1988 .

[34]  J. Ichikawa,et al.  Influence of alterations in the oral environment on speech production. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[35]  J. Abbs,et al.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Paul Kerswill,et al.  Electropalatography in the analysis of connected speech processes , 1989 .

[37]  Speech adaptation: an aerodynamic study of adults with a childhood history of articulation defects. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[38]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Cinefluorographic analyses of selected lingual consonants. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Compensating for a bite block in /s/ and /t/ production: palatographic, acoustic, and perceptual data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Maureen Stone,et al.  Compensatory vowel characteristics resulting from the presence of different types of experimental dental prostheses , 1976 .