Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions.

UNLABELLED As materials technology and the field of biomedical engineering advances, the role of cellular mechanisms, in particular adhesive interactions with implantable devices, becomes more relevant in both research and clinical practice. A key tenet of medical device design has evolved from the exquisite ability of biological systems to respond to topographical features or chemical stimuli, a process that has led to the development of next-generation biomaterials for a wide variety of clinical disorders. In vitro studies have identified nanoscale features as potent modulators of cellular behavior through the onset of focal adhesion formation. The focus of this review is on the recent developments concerning the role of nanoscale structures on integrin-mediated adhesion and cellular function with an emphasis on the generation of medical constructs with regenerative applications. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR In this review, recent developments related to the role of nanoscale structures on integrin-mediated adhesion and cellular function is discussed, with an emphasis on regenerative applications.

[1]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. , 2005, Nano letters.

[2]  M. Shimomura,et al.  Effect of pore size of self-organized honeycomb-patterned polymer films on spreading, focal adhesion, proliferation, and function of endothelial cells. , 2007, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[3]  F. Ren,et al.  Randomly oriented, upright SiO2 coated nanorods for reduced adhesion of mammalian cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[4]  J. Spatz,et al.  Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[5]  Kevin J Luebke,et al.  Correlation of anisotropic cell behaviors with topographic aspect ratio. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[6]  P. F. Nealey,et al.  Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque , 1999, Cell and Tissue Research.

[7]  Andrés J. García Get a grip: integrins in cell-biomaterial interactions. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[8]  Yen Chang,et al.  The characteristics and in vivo suppression of neointimal formation with sirolimus-eluting polymeric stents. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[9]  Tom Shemesh,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal adhesions: experiments and models. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[10]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  D. Landolt,et al.  Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[12]  R. Oreffo,et al.  The interaction of human bone marrow cells with nanotopographical features in three dimensional constructs. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  M. Biggs,et al.  Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330 nm deep microgrooves , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Eun Kyu Lee,et al.  Analysis of protein adsorption characteristics to nano-pore silica particles by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[15]  R D Kamm,et al.  Force-induced focal adhesion translocation: effects of force amplitude and frequency. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[16]  G. E. Marshall,et al.  Interactions of human blood and tissue cell types with 95-nm-high nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[17]  Julie Gold,et al.  Nanostructured model biomaterial surfaces prepared by colloidal lithography , 1999 .

[18]  Ivan Stamenkovic,et al.  Functional structure and composition of the extracellular matrix , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[19]  Yong Wang,et al.  Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(L-lactide). , 2005, Biomaterials.

[20]  T. Meshel,et al.  Cell migration to the chemokine CXCL8: Paxillin is activated and regulates adhesion and cell motility , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[21]  T. Webster,et al.  Decreased macrophage density on carbon nanotube patterns on polycarbonate urethane. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[22]  Masahiro Ohshima,et al.  Time-lapse observation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  M. Horton,et al.  Skeletal tissues as nanomaterials , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[24]  R. Bizios,et al.  Human mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and proliferation in response to ceramic chemistry and nanoscale topography. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[25]  C. Murphy,et al.  Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[26]  M. Stoltenberg,et al.  Hydroxyapatite Coatings Did not Increase TGF-β and BMP-2 Secretion in Murine J774A.1 Macrophages, but Induced a Pro-inflammatory Cytokine Response , 2009, Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition.

[27]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  J. Tardif,et al.  Biocompatibility aspects of new stent technology. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  Renny T. Franceschi,et al.  Critical role of the extracellular signal–regulated kinase–MAPK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[31]  X. F. Wang,et al.  Nanoscale surface topography enhances cell adhesion and gene expression of madine darby canine kidney cells , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[32]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Making structures for cell engineering. , 2004, European cells & materials.

[33]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  M. Abe,et al.  Roles of Extracellular Signal‐regulated Kinase 1/2 and p38 Mitogen‐activated Protein Kinase in the Signal Transduction of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Endothelial Cells during Angiogenesis , 1999, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[35]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[36]  R. Darouiche,et al.  Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al.  Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells , 2003, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[38]  M. Susani,et al.  Differentiation of mononuclear blood cells into macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells in thrombus organization. , 1988, Experimental cell biology.

[39]  Jun Hu,et al.  Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[40]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Electrochemical polishing of 316L stainless steel slotted tube coronary stents , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[41]  S. Hanks,et al.  Focal Adhesion Kinase Suppresses Apoptosis by Binding to the Death Domain of Receptor-Interacting Protein , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[42]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Recent progress in tissue engineering. , 2001, Drug discovery today.

[43]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[44]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[45]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[46]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. 3. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[47]  H. Perreault,et al.  Characterization of plasma proteins adsorbed onto biomaterials. By MALDI-TOFMS. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[48]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[49]  J. Jansen,et al.  The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[50]  Rennian Wang,et al.  β1 integrin/FAK/ERK signalling pathway is essential for human fetal islet cell differentiation and survival , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[51]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[52]  P. Soon-Shiong,et al.  Insulin independence in a type 1 diabetic patient after encapsulated islet transplantation , 1994, The Lancet.

[53]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[54]  M. Riehle,et al.  Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[55]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[56]  A. Curtis,et al.  Tutorial on the biology of nanotopography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[57]  Yasuhiko Tabata,et al.  Tissue regeneration based on tissue engineering technology , 2004, Congenital anomalies.

[58]  S. Miscia,et al.  Implant surface roughness influences osteoclast proliferation and differentiation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[59]  M. Schvartzman,et al.  Fabrication of Nanoscale Bioarrays for the Study of Cytoskeletal Protein Binding Interactions Using Nanoimprint Lithography. , 2009, Journal of vacuum science & technology. B, Microelectronics and nanometer structures : processing, measurement, and phenomena : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society.

[60]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[61]  P. Kannus Structure of the tendon connective tissue , 2000, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[62]  Lifeng Chi,et al.  Osteoblast alignment, elongation and migration on grooved polystyrene surfaces patterned by Langmuir-Blodgett lithography. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[63]  M. Kellomäki,et al.  A Midterm Follow-Up Study of Bioreconstructive Polylactide Scaffold Implants in Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients , 2009, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume.

[64]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[65]  J. Jansen,et al.  Effect of microgrooved poly-l-lactic (PLA) surfaces on proliferation, cytoskeletal organization, and mineralized matrix formation of rat bone marrow cells. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[66]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Fibroblast and osteoblast adhesion and morphology on calcium phosphate surfaces. , 2002, European cells & materials.

[67]  C. D. W. Wilkinson,et al.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[68]  A Curtis,et al.  Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[69]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[70]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Effect of molecular mobility of polymeric implants on soft tissue reactions: an in vivo study in rats. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[71]  Patrik Schmuki,et al.  Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. , 2007, Nano letters.

[72]  P. Santi,et al.  Ultrastructure and immunohistochemical identification of the extracellular matrix of the chinchilla cochlea , 1999, Hearing Research.

[73]  Wolter,et al.  Sessile macrophages forming clear endothelium-like membrane on inside of successful keratoprosthesis. , 1984, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[74]  Joshua C. Hansen,et al.  The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[75]  C. Murphy,et al.  Nano- and Microscale Holes Modulate Cell-Substrate Adhesion, Cytoskeletal Organization, and Integrin Localization in Sv40 Human , 2006 .

[76]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Cooperativity in adhesion cluster formation during initial cell adhesion. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[77]  D. Hammer,et al.  A theoretical analysis for the effect of focal contact formation on cell-substrate attachment strength. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[78]  B. Geiger,et al.  Early molecular events in the assembly of the focal adhesion-stress fiber complex during fibroblast spreading. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[79]  M. Dalby,et al.  The effect of the RACK1 signalling protein on the regulation of cell adhesion and cell contact guidance on nanometric grooves. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[80]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[81]  T. Groth,et al.  Influence of polymer membrane porosity on C3A hepatoblastoma cell adhesive interaction and function. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[82]  T. Osawa,et al.  Scanning electron microscopic observations of the basement membranes with dithiothreitol separation , 2003, Medical Electron Microscopy.

[83]  Richard A. Pethrick,et al.  Surface Topography and Composition of Deuterated Polystyrene-Poly(bromostyrene) Blends , 1996 .

[84]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase signaling pathway participates in the formation of choroidal neovascularization and regulates the proliferation and migration of choroidal microvascular endothelial cells by acting through HIF-1 and VEGF expression in RPE cells. , 2009, Experimental eye research.

[85]  J. Parsons,et al.  pp125FAK a structurally distinctive protein-tyrosine kinase associated with focal adhesions. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  H. Hattori,et al.  Focal Adhesion Kinase Regulates Pathogen-Killing Capability and Life Span of Neutrophils via Mediating Both Adhesion-Dependent and -Independent Cellular Signals1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[87]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Third-Generation Biomedical Materials , 2002, Science.

[88]  R G Richards,et al.  Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S‐phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[89]  Toshiyuki Kanamori,et al.  Surface modification of poly(l-lactic acid) affects initial cell attachment, cell morphology, and cell growth , 2005, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[90]  C. Turner,et al.  Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[91]  D. Metcalfe,et al.  Both adhesion to immobilized vitronectin and FcɛRI cross‐linking cause enhanced focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation in murine mast cells , 1999, Immunology.

[92]  A. Besser,et al.  Force-induced adsorption and anisotropic growth of focal adhesions. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[93]  M. Swierczewska,et al.  Nano- and sub-micron porous polyelectrolyte multilayer assemblies: biomimetic surfaces for human corneal epithelial cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[94]  C. Grandi,et al.  Effect of synthetic peptides on osteoblast adhesion. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[95]  L. Morbidelli,et al.  Nanostructured HA crystals up-regulate FGF-2 expression and activity in microvascular endothelium promoting angiogenesis. , 2007, Bone.

[96]  C J Murphy,et al.  Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[97]  Daniel J Müller,et al.  Analyzing focal adhesion structure by atomic force microscopy , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[98]  James Runt,et al.  Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[99]  Implant recommendations. , 2000, JAMA.

[100]  Arash Aslani,et al.  Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite/titania coatings on titanium improves osteoblast adhesion. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[101]  D. Brunette,et al.  Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[102]  Lavanya Vasudevan,et al.  Focal adhesion proteins connect IgE receptors to the cytoskeleton as revealed by micropatterned ligand arrays , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  David A. Cheresh,et al.  Differential αv integrin–mediated Ras-ERK signaling during two pathways of angiogenesis , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[104]  Patrik Schmuki,et al.  TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm--an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. , 2009, Small.

[105]  E. Fleck,et al.  Angiotensin II-augmented migration of VSMCs towards PDGF-BB involves Pyk2 and ERK 1/2 activation , 2002, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[106]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[107]  Chang‐Hwan Choi,et al.  Influence of Systematically Varied Nano-Scale Topography on Cell Morphology and Adhesion , 2007, Cell communication & adhesion.

[108]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[109]  Benjamin G Keselowsky,et al.  Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[110]  A. Curtis,et al.  Nonadhesive nanotopography: fibroblast response to poly(n-butyl methacrylate)-poly(styrene) demixed surface features. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[111]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[112]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.

[113]  Jason W. Triplett,et al.  Disruption of alpha-actinin-integrin interactions at focal adhesions renders osteoblasts susceptible to apoptosis. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[114]  Richard O Hynes,et al.  Integrins Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines , 2002, Cell.

[115]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[116]  A F von Recum,et al.  Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[117]  D. Burr,et al.  A Model for mechanotransduction in bone cells: The load‐bearing mechanosomes , 2003, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[118]  M. Wood Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[119]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[120]  Hung-Ta Wang,et al.  The control of cell adhesion and viability by zinc oxide nanorods. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[121]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[122]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Modulation of Adhesion and Growth of Cardiac Myocytes by Surface Nanotopography , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[123]  C. Siedlecki,et al.  Submicron poly(L-lactic acid) pillars affect fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[124]  E. Ruoslahti,et al.  Control of adhesion-dependent cell survival by focal adhesion kinase , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[125]  Joshua C. Hansen,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on poly(L-lactic acid)/polystyrene demixed thin film blends: effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry, and wettability. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[126]  M. Pittenger,et al.  Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation to the Osteogenic or Adipogenic Lineage Is Regulated by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[127]  M. Conaway,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase, Rap1, and transcriptional induction of vascular endothelial growth factor. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[128]  Tejal A. Desai,et al.  Methods for Fabrication of Nanoscale Topography for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[129]  P. Tengvall,et al.  Fibrous capsule formation around titanium and copper. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[130]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Global Conformational Rearrangements in Integrin Extracellular Domains in Outside-In and Inside-Out Signaling , 2002, Cell.

[131]  R. Waugh,et al.  Cell adhesion molecule distribution relative to neutrophil surface topography assessed by TIRFM. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[132]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[133]  A. Boskey,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase signaling pathways regulate the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[134]  Karl Kingsley,et al.  Laminin-5 induces osteogenic gene expression in human mesenchymal stem cells through an ERK-dependent pathway. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[135]  L. Addadi,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Sequence of Events in Cell Adhesion: From Molecular Recognition to Focal Adhesion Assembly , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[136]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[137]  Paul Nealey,et al.  Characterization of endothelial basement membrane nanotopography in rhesus macaque as a guide for vessel tissue engineering. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[138]  Jun Hu,et al.  Nanotopographical guidance of C6 glioma cell alignment and oriented growth. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[139]  C. Murphy,et al.  Characterizing nanoscale topography of the aortic heart valve basement membrane for tissue engineering heart valve scaffold design. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[140]  S. Kanner,et al.  Human T and B lymphocytes express a structurally conserved focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK. , 1993, DNA and cell biology.

[141]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. , 1991, Journal of cell science.