Effects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary

AbstractHigh school students enrolled in a French course learned vocabulary words under conditions of either massed or distributed practice as part of their regular class activities. Distributed practice consisted of three 10-minute units on each of three successive days; massed practice consisted of all three units being completed during a 30-minute period on a single day. Though performance of the two groups was virtually identical on a test given immediately after completion of study, the students who had learned the words by distributed practice did substantially better (35%) than the massed- practice students on a second test given 4 days later. The implications of the findings for classroom instruction and the need to distinguish between learning and memory are discussed.

[1]  Studies of distributed practice. XVIII. The influence of meaningfulness and intralist similarity of serial nonsense lists. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  B. Underwood Ten years of massed practice on distributed practice. , 1961 .

[3]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. , 1964 .

[4]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Facilitation in short- and long-term retention of paired associates following distributed practice in learning , 1964 .

[5]  FIRST-LIST RETENTION AS A FUNCTION OF LIST DIFFERENTIATION AND SECOND-LIST MASSED AND DISTRIBUTED PRACTICE. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  List differentiation and distributed practice. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  A reconsideration of the extinction-recovery theory , 1967 .

[8]  B. Underwood,et al.  Studies of distributed practice. XXIV. Differentiation and proactive inhibition. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  R. Olton The effect of mnemonic upon the retention of paired-associate verbal material , 1969 .

[10]  T. Shuell,et al.  Learning Ability and Retention. , 1970 .

[11]  L. Postman,et al.  Experimental analysis of coding processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Delay-retention effect in natural classroom settings. , 1975 .

[13]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. , 1978 .

[14]  Thomas J. Shuell,et al.  Distribution of Practice and Retroactive Inhibition in Free-Recall Learning , 1981 .