Catalytic conditioning of synthesis gas produced by biomass gasification

The catalytic steam reforming of aromatic hydrocarbons in a background of synthesis gas was investigated for two catalysts. A proprietary non-nickel based catalyst, designated DN-34, and a commercial nickel steam reforming catalyst ICI 46-1 were tested. Statistically designed experiments were used to examine the effects of temperature, space velocity and percent of steam in the feed on catalyst performance. All experiments were performed in a plug-flow micro-reactor interfaced with a molecular beam mass spectrometer. The catalyst DN-34 was also tested in slip-stream fluidized bed reactors attached to a 9 tonne day−1 indirectly heated biomass gasifier at Battelle Columbus Laboratory. DN-34 was found to be effective for destroying a variety of aromatic hydrocarbons found in biomass gasifier tar in both the micro-reactor and gasifier-scale experiments. DN-34 also exhibited significant water-gas shift activity but was unsatisfactory for methane destruction. ICI 46-1 exhibited excellent methane steam reforming activity. A process is suggested that uses DN-34 to steam reform tar and perform the water-gas shift, followed by a second reactor with ICI 46-1 to reform methane. Differences and similarities with other dual-bed processes described in the literature are discussed.

[1]  José Corella,et al.  Improved steam gasification of lignocellulosic residues in a fluidized bed with commercial steam reforming catalysts , 1993 .

[2]  Krister Sjöström,et al.  Catalytic cracking of tar in biomass pyrolysis gas in the presence of calcined dolomite , 1992 .

[3]  Charles N. Satterfield,et al.  Heterogeneous catalysis in industrial practice , 1991 .

[4]  P. Magne,et al.  Method of determining catalyst lifetime in the cracking reaction of tar from wood pyrolysis , 1991 .

[5]  H. Egnéus,et al.  Methanol production from biomass. , 1984 .

[6]  D. Duprez,et al.  Selective steam reforming of aromatic hydrocarbons: IV. Steam conversion and hydroconversion of selected monoalkyl- and dialkyl-benzenes on Rh catalysts , 1984 .

[7]  L. K. Mudge,et al.  Improved gasification by catalytic destruction of tars in biomass-derived gases , 1988 .

[8]  Pekka Simell,et al.  Catalytic purification of tarry fuel gas , 1990 .

[9]  D. Duprez,et al.  Effects of dispersion and partial reduction on the catalytic properties of Rh/Al2O3 catalysts in the steam reforming of mono- and bicyclic aromatics , 1989 .

[10]  Thomas A. Milne,et al.  Molecular characterization of the pyrolysis of biomass , 1987 .

[11]  Brown,et al.  Bench-scale studies on gasification of biomass in the presence of catalysts , 1987 .

[12]  D. A. Sullivan,et al.  Gas-Phase Ion and Neutral Thermochemistry , 1988 .

[13]  Jukka Leppälahti,et al.  Catalytic purification of tarry fuel gas with carbonate rocks and ferrous materials , 1992 .

[14]  Eddie G. Baker,et al.  Steam gasification of biomass with nickel secondary catalysts , 1987 .

[15]  Thomas A. Milne,et al.  Molecular characterization of the pyrolysis of biomass. 2. Applications , 1987 .