On the prediction of concentration variations in a dispersing heavy-duty truck exhaust plume using k–ε turbulent closure

Abstract This work presents the computational fluid dynamic modeling of an exhaust plume dispersed from the exhaust pipe of a class-8 tractor truck powered by 330 hp Cummins M11 electronically controlled diesel engine. This effort utilizes an advanced CFD technique to accurately predict the variation of carbon dioxide concentration inside a turbulent plume using a k – e eddy dissipation model. The simulation includes the “real-world” operation of a truck and its exhaust plume in a NASA, Langley aircraft testing wind tunnel, that had an effective volume of 226, 535 m 3 (8,000,000 ft 3 ). The predicted results show an excellent agreement with the experimentally measured values of CO 2 concentrations, dilution ratios, and the temperature variations inside the plume. A specific goal of this effort was to study the effect of recirculation region near the truck walls on dispersion of the plume. For this purpose, growth of the plume from the center of the exhaust pipe is also presented and discussed. This work also shows the benefits of CFD modeling in applications where dispersion correlations are not required a priori, instead the dispersion coefficients are calculated precisely by solving the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation equations.

[1]  Jeffrey Weil,et al.  A PDF Dispersion Model for Buoyant Plumes in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1997 .

[2]  Huai Wen-xin,et al.  Similarity solutions of round jets and plumes , 1993 .

[3]  Peter H. Schuepp,et al.  Source strength determination of a tracer gas using an approximate solution to the advection–diffusion equation for microplots , 2000 .

[4]  R. G. Lamb Diffusion in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1984 .

[5]  D. Spalding Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames , 1971 .

[6]  Stefan Heinz,et al.  Buoyant plume rise described by a Lagrangian turbulence model , 1999 .

[7]  B. L. Sawford,et al.  The effect of Gaussian particle‐pair distribution functions in the statistical theory of concentration fluctuations in homogeneous turbulence , 1983 .

[8]  E. D. Obasaju,et al.  Simulation of Pollution Dispersion Using Small Scale Physical Models — An Assessment of Scaling Options , 1998 .

[9]  W. S. Lewellen,et al.  A turbulent-transport model for concentration fluctuations and fluxes , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  F. Gifford,et al.  Use of routine meteorological observations for estimating atmospheric dispersion , 1961 .

[11]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Concentration fluctuations in a smoke plume , 1984 .

[12]  Paul A. Durbin,et al.  A stochastic model of two-particle dispersion and concentration fluctuations in homogeneous turbulence , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Anil Kumar Yadav,et al.  Simulation of diffusion experiments under light wind, stable conditions by a variable K-theory model , 1998 .

[14]  Eugene Yee,et al.  A simple model for the probability density function of concentration fluctuations in atmospheric plumes , 1997 .

[15]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Representation of internal plume structure in Gifford's meandering plume model , 2000 .

[16]  F. A. Gifford,et al.  Horizontal diffusion in the atmosphere: A Lagrangian-dynamical theory , 1982 .