Large predators and their prey in a southern African savanna: a predator's size determines its prey size range

Summary 1A long-term (13-year) data set, based on > 4000 kills, was used to test whether a sympatric group of large predators adheres to the theoretical predictions that (1) mean prey body size and (2) prey diversity increase as functions of predator body size. 2All kills observed by safari guides are documented routinely in Mala Mala Private Game Reserve, South Africa. We analysed these records for lion (Panthera leo, Linnaeus), leopard (Panthera pardus, Linnaeus), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus, Schreber) and African wild dog (Lycaon pictus, Temminck). Males and females of the sexually dimorphic felid species were treated as functionally distinct predator types. Prey types were classified by species, sex and age class. 3Prey profiles were compared among predator types in terms of richness and evenness to consider how both the range of prey types used and the dominance of particular prey types within each range may be influenced by predator size. No significant size-dependent relationships were found, so factors separate from or additional to body size must explain variation in prey diversity across sympatric predators. 4A statistically strong relationship was found between mean prey mass and predator mass (r2 = 0·86, P= 0·002), although pairwise comparisons showed that most predators killed similar prey despite wide differences in predator size. Also, minimum prey mass was independent of predator mass while maximum prey mass was strongly dependent on predator mass (r2 = 0·71, P= 0·017). The ecological significance is that larger predators do not specialize on larger prey, but exploit a wider range of prey sizes.

[1]  D. Wilson.  The Adequacy of Body Size as a Niche Difference , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[3]  T. Schoener.  Models of Optimal Size for Solitary Predators , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[4]  G. Frame.  Carnivore Competition and Resource use in the Serengeti Ecosystem of Tanzania , 1986 .

[5]  Renate McVittie.  Changes ion the social behaviour of South West African cheetah , 1979 .

[6]  A. Vézina.  Empirical relationships between predator and prey size among terrestrial vertebrate predators , 1985, Oecologia.

[7]  H. Kruuk,et al.  COMPARATIVE NOTES ON PREDATION BY LION, LEOPARD, CHEETAH AND WILD DOG IN THE SERENGETI AREA, EAST AFRICA , 1967 .

[8]  S. Creel.  The African Wild Dog , 2019, Nature.

[9]  N. Fairall.  Production parameters of the impala, Aepyceros melampus , 1983 .

[10]  J. Speakman,et al.  High hunting costs make African wild dogs vulnerable to kleptoparasitism by hyaenas , 1998, Nature.

[11]  U. D. Pienaar.  Predator-prey relationships amongst the larger mammals of the Kruger National Park , 1969 .

[12]  M. Gorman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Density and Distribution of Wild Dogs in the Kruger National Park , 1997 .

[13]  R. Smithers,et al.  The mammals of the southern African subregion , 1983 .

[14]  M. Mills,et al.  Prey apportionment and related ecological relationships between large carnivores in Kruger National Park , 1993 .

[15]  K. U. Karanth,et al.  prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests , 1995 .

[16]  G. Schaller.  The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations , 1972 .

[17]  Simon Gates,et al.  Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta‐analysis in ecology , 2002 .

[18]  Theodore Stankowich,et al.  The African Wild Dog: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation , 2003 .

[19]  M. Mills.  Prey selection and feeding habits of the large carnivores in the Southern Kalahari , 1984 .

[20]  N. Jacobsen.  A herpetological survey of the Transvaal. , 1989 .

[21]  K. U. Karanth,et al.  Behavioural correlates of predation by tiger (Panthera tigris), leopard (Panthera pardus) and dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Nagarahole, India , 2000 .

[22]  Chris Carbone,et al.  Feeding success in African wild dogs : does kleptoparasitism by spotted hyenas influence hunting group size ? , 1997 .

[23]  V. Bleich,et al.  SELECTION OF MULE DEER BY MOUNTAIN LIONS AND COYOTES: EFFECTS OF HUNTING STYLE, BODY SIZE, AND REPRODUCTIVE STATUS , 2000 .

[24]  M. Rosenzweig.  COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN SYMPATRIC CARNIVORA , 1966 .

[25]  C. Dickman.  Body Size, Prey Size, and Community Structure in Insectivorous Mammals , 1988 .

[26]  W. Gertenbach,et al.  Landscapes of the Kruger National Park , 1983 .

[27]  R. M’Closkey.  Community Structure in Sympatric Rodents , 1976 .

[28]  J. Malcolm,et al.  NOTES ON WILD DOGS (LYCAON PICTUS) HUNTING ZEBRAS , 1975 .

[29]  J. Skinner,et al.  The diet of the spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in Kruger National Park , 1990 .

[30]  S. Durant.  Competition refuges and coexistence : an example from Serengeti carnivores , 1998 .

[31]  W. Gertenbach.  Rainfall patterns in the Kruger National Park. , 1980 .

[32]  R. Owen-Smith,et al.  Megaherbivores: The Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology , 1990 .

[33]  J. A. Camargo.  Must Dominance Increase with the Number of Subordinate Species in Competitive Interactions , 1993 .

[34]  直祐 糸魚川.  Behavior, ecology, and conservation , 1992 .

[35]  J. L. Gittleman.  Carnivore body size: Ecological and taxonomic correlates , 1985, Oecologia.

[36]  Joan Saldaña,et al.  Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs , 1993 .

[37]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores , 1999, Nature.

[38]  N. Owen‐Smith,et al.  Body Size, Population Metabolism, and Habitat Specialization Among Large African Herbivores , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  A consumer's guide to evenness indices , 1996 .

[40]  J. Hart,et al.  Diet, prey selection and ecological relations of leopard and golden cat in the Ituri Forest, Zaire , 1996 .

[41]  A. Roberts.  The mammals of South Africa , 1951 .