Experimental performance comparison and optical characteristics of aperture mechanisms for solar cavity receivers

Abstract Dynamic control of solar thermal processes is a critical bottleneck demanding to be addressed for the development of viable alternatives to traditional industrial processes that rely on high temperature process heat from fossil fuel combustion. Current technologies possess various concentrated solar power (CSP) control strategies to compensate for natural fluctuations of solar irradiation while some of the dynamic control problems are addressed by creative reactor design to capture solar energy more efficiently. In this paper, a solar receiver with two light entry controlling aperture mechanisms is proposed as a promising control method for manipulated radiation entry into the cavity. Design and motion characteristics of these aperture mechanisms govern the amount of flux intercepted by the receiver. Performance of these apertures in maintaining semi-constant temperature inside the receiver was tested numerically and experimentally for comprehensive explanation of the physics behind the results. An optical analysis was done by implementing two different Monte Carlo Ray Tracing (MCRT) approaches for comparison and verification of complex aperture designs. Total radiative losses were determined by considering the energy balance on the quartz window by taking the spectral-dependent optical properties of the window into account. A thermal analysis was done in conjunction with the optical analysis to demonstrate thermal-optic performance of both mechanisms. A 7 kW high flux Xenon bulb was optically modeled according to experimentally obtained radiation maps. The optical model was coupled as an input to a thermal computation with lumped parameter assumption. Numerical results were validated by comparison with experimental results for both steady and dynamic responses. Estimation of a high flux scenario at steady state as well as for a given DNI pattern were numerically predicted and comparisons with conventional control methods were made. Results demonstrated the potential of the variable aperture in terms of temperature control and receiver efficiency.

[1]  N. Kanellopoulos Small-Scale Gas to Liquid Fuel Synthesis , 2015 .

[2]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  Design, Manufacturing and Testing of a Camera-Like Aperture Mechanism for a Solar Reactor , 2011 .

[3]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  A Novel Iris Mechanism for Solar Thermal Receivers , 2017 .

[4]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Visual format for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis in clinical samples using molecular beacons. , 2009, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[5]  N. Gokon,et al.  Ferrite/zirconia-coated foam device prepared by spin coating for solar demonstration of thermochemic , 2011 .

[6]  Wojciech Lipiński,et al.  Operational Performance of the University of Minnesota 45 kWe High-Flux Solar Simulator , 2013 .

[7]  Eckhard Lüpfert,et al.  Beam Characterization and Improvement with a Flux Mapping System for Dish Concentrators , 2002 .

[8]  R. Siegel,et al.  Net radiation method for enclosure systems involving partially transparent walls , 1973 .

[9]  João Miranda Lemos,et al.  Temperature control of a solar furnace for material testing , 2011, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[10]  Wojciech Lipiński,et al.  Optical Design of Multisource High-Flux Solar Simulators , 2015 .

[11]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  Development of a control model to regulate temperature in a solar receiver , 2017 .

[12]  E. Guillot,et al.  An adaptive temperature control law for a solar furnace , 2008, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[13]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  Description and characterization of an adjustable flux solar simulator for solar thermal, thermochemical and photovoltaic applications , 2014 .

[14]  Aldo Steinfeld,et al.  Derivation of the Angular Dispersion Error Distribution of Mirror Surfaces for Monte Carlo Ray-Tracing Applications , 2011 .

[15]  Zhiwei Sun,et al.  Time-resolved spectra of solar simulators employing metal halide and xenon arc lamps , 2015 .

[16]  Philipp Haueter,et al.  Characterization of a 6 kW high-flux solar simulator with an array of xenon arc lamps capable of concentrations of nearly 5000 suns. , 2015, The Review of scientific instruments.

[17]  C. Sattler,et al.  Chapter 15. Solar-Aided Syngas Production via Two-Step, Redox-Pair-Based Thermochemical Cycles , 2015 .

[18]  Alan W. Weimer,et al.  Solar-thermal dissociation of methane in a fluid-wall aerosol flow reactor , 2004 .

[19]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[20]  M. Akbar Rhamdhani,et al.  Development of high flux solar simulators for solar thermal research , 2015 .

[21]  Christian Sattler,et al.  Solar water splitting for hydrogen production with monolithic reactors , 2005 .

[22]  Clifford K. Ho,et al.  Design and Characterization of a 7.2 KW Solar Simulator , 2015 .

[23]  Jörg Petrasch,et al.  Dynamics and control of solar thermochemical reactors , 2009 .

[24]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  Design, manufacturing and testing of an aperture mechanism for a solar reactor , 2011 .

[25]  A. Steinfeld,et al.  Temperature of a Quartz/Sapphire Window in a Solar Cavity-Receiver , 2011 .

[26]  Aldo Steinfeld,et al.  Optimum aperture size and operating temperature of a solar cavity-receiver , 1993 .

[27]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  AN IRIS MECHANISM DRIVEN TEMPERATURE CONTROL OF SOLAR THERMAL REACTORS , 2016 .

[28]  Hadrien Benoit,et al.  Validation of a Monte Carlo Integral Formulation Applied to Solar Facility Simulations and Use of Sensitivities , 2015 .

[29]  Jose Rodriguez,et al.  New PSA high concentration solar furnace SF40 , 2016 .

[30]  Aldo Steinfeld,et al.  Solar thermal cracking of methane in a particle-flow reactor for the co-production of hydrogen and carbon , 2009 .

[31]  E. A. Fletcher,et al.  Hydrogen- and Oxygen from Water , 1977, Science.

[32]  J. B. Blackmon Heliostat size optimization for central receiver solar power plants , 2012 .

[33]  Abraham Kogan,et al.  Direct solar thermal splitting of water and on-site separation of the products—II. Experimental feasibility study , 1998 .

[34]  T. Kodama High-temperature solar chemistry for converting solar heat to chemical fuels , 2003 .

[35]  Christian Sattler,et al.  Test operation of a 100 kW pilot plant for solar hydrogen production from water on a solar tower , 2011 .

[36]  Manuel Berenguel,et al.  Control of Solar Energy Systems , 2012 .

[37]  G. Flamant,et al.  Kinetic modelling of methane decomposition in a tubular solar reactor , 2009 .

[38]  J. Szekely,et al.  Heat transfer in a cyclone , 1966 .

[39]  Wojciech Lipiński,et al.  Experimental and numerical characterization of a new 45 kWel multisource high-flux solar simulator. , 2016, Optics express.

[40]  Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Modeling of a Solar Chemical Reactor for The Co-Production of Zinc and Syngas , 2005 .

[41]  A. Steinfeld,et al.  Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H2O and CO2via ceria redox reactions in a high-temperature solar reactor , 2012 .

[42]  Nesrin Ozalp,et al.  Aperture size adjustment using model based adaptive control strategy to regulate temperature in a solar receiver , 2018 .

[43]  Antonio Visioli,et al.  Fractional robust PID control of a solar furnace , 2016 .