3. D.W. Massaro, Broadening the domain of the fuzzy logical model of perception, in Cognition: Con ceptual and Methodological Issues, H.L. Pick, Jr., P. Van den Broek, and D.C. Knill, Eds. (American Psy chological Association, Washington, DC, 1992). 4. M.M. Cohen and D.W. Massaro, Synthesis of visible speech, Behavioral Research Methods, In strumentation, & Computers, 22, 260-263 (1990); M.M. Cohen and D.W. Massaro, Modeling coartic ulation in synthetic visual speech, in Models and Techniques in Computer Animation, N.M. Thal mann and D. Thalmann, Eds. (Springer-Verlag, To kyo, 1993); M.M. Cohen and D.W. Massaro, De velopment and experimentation with synthetic visible speech, Behavioral Research Methods, In strumentation, & Computers, 26, 260-265 (1994); F.l. Parke, A model for human faces that allows speech synchronized animation, Computers and Graphics Journal, 7(1), 1-4(1975). 5. B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage, and ). Morton, Eds., Devel opmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Pro cessing in the First Year of Life (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993); C.A. Fowler and D.J. Dekle, Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception, Journal of Ex perimental Psychology: Human Perception and Per formance, 17,8} 6-828 (1991 ); Q. Summerfield, Vi sual perception of phonetic gestures, in Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception, I.G. Mattingly and M. Studdert-Kennedy, Eds. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991). 6. A. Liberman and I.C. Mattingly, The motor theory of speech perception revised, Cognition, 21, 1-33 (1985); I.G. Mattingly and M. Studdert Kennedy, Eds., Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991). 7. J.W. Ellison and D.W. Massaro, Evaluating and integrating features in the identification of facial affect, unpublished manuscript, University of Cali fornia, Santa Cruz (1994). 8. S.C. Levine, M.T. Banich, and M.P. Koch Weser, Face recognition: A general or specific right hemisphere capacity? Brain and Cognition, 8, 303 325(1988). 9. B. Dodd and R. Campbell, Eds., Hearing by Eye: The Psychology of Lip-Reading (Erlbaum, Hills dale, NJ, 1987).
[1]
H. Pick,et al.
Young children's use of models and photographs as spatial representations
,
1992
.
[2]
J. Deloache.
Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space
,
1989
.
[3]
J. Deloache.
Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children.
,
1987,
Science.
[4]
J. Deloache,et al.
Symbolic development in young children: Understanding models and pictures.
,
1993
.
[5]
J. Deloache,et al.
The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
,
1995,
Journal of experimental child psychology.
[6]
J. Deloache,et al.
Physical similarity and young children's understanding of scale models.
,
1991,
Child development.
[7]
J. Deloache.
Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models.
,
1991,
Child development.
[8]
DeWitt H. Parker,et al.
Philosophy in a New Key
,
1941
.
[9]
Donald P. Marzolf,et al.
Transfer in young children's understanding of spatial representations.
,
1994,
Child development.