A Fast Time-Step Selection Method for Explicit Solver-Based Simulation of High Frequency Low Loss Circuit and Its Application on EMI Filter

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) modeling and prediction are essential for the design of most power electronics apparatuses. This article aims at finding a fast method to select time step for explicit solver-based simulation of high frequency low loss (HFLL) circuits like EMI filter. The state-space model of HFLL circuit is constructed and its eigenvalues are proved to be very close to the imaginary axis. Both the nondegenerate and degenerate circuit cases are discussed. During the analysis, a circuit lemma is summarized on how to transform degenerate circuit into nondegenerate circuit and the corresponding inversion of its coefficient matrix is derived based on Sherman–Morrison's formula. Then the Laguerre–Samuelson's inequality is employed to find the upper bound of HFLL circuit's eigenvalues. This process only requires two matrix multiplications and traces of the matrix operation results, thus keeping the computational complexity retaining in $O(N^2)$. A typical EMI filter is constructed and its equivalent circuit including the parasitic effects is extracted from ANSYS. This filter is simulated in application between a dc/ac converter and the grid using the fourth-order Runge–Kutta (RK4) solver with a time step selected by the proposed method. Numerical test shows that the spectrum results are very close to those obtained by experiment while being much more efficient than traditional methods, which demonstrates that this time-step selection method could benefit the analysis and time-domain simulation of HFLL circuits.

[1]  Huaizhi Wang,et al.  Modeling and Design of the Magnetic Integration of Single- and Multi-Stage EMI Filters , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  Gerd Griepentrog,et al.  Finite element method based electromagnetic modeling of three-phase EMI filters , 2016, 2016 IEEE 2nd Annual Southern Power Electronics Conference (SPEC).

[3]  Wenhua Tan,et al.  A High Frequency Equivalent Circuit and Parameter Extraction Procedure for Common Mode Choke in the EMI Filter , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[4]  E. Fehlberg,et al.  Low-order classical Runge-Kutta formulas with stepsize control and their application to some heat transfer problems , 1969 .

[5]  H. Akagi,et al.  Design and performance of a passive EMI filter for use with a voltage-source PWM inverter having sinusoidal output voltage and zero common-mode voltage , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[6]  Shane T. Jensen,et al.  Some Comments and a Bibliography on the Laguerre-Samuelson Inequality with Extensions and Applications in Statistics and Matrix Theory , 1999 .

[7]  Jian Sun,et al.  Parameterization of Three-Phase Electric Machine Models for EMI Simulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  Johann W. Kolar,et al.  3-D Electromagnetic Modeling of EMI Input Filters , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  William W. Hager,et al.  Updating the Inverse of a Matrix , 1989, SIAM Rev..

[10]  Ivica Stevanovic,et al.  Length-Scalable Multiconductor Cable Modeling for EMI Simulations in Power Electronics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  A Matrix Proof of Newton's Identities , 2000 .

[12]  Venkata Dinavahi,et al.  An Efficient Hierarchical Zonal Method for Large-Scale Circuit Simulation and Its Real-Time Application on More Electric Aircraft Microgrid , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[14]  H. Wolkowicz,et al.  Bounds for eigenvalues using traces , 1980 .

[15]  Johann W. Kolar,et al.  The Three-Phase Common-Mode Inductor: Modeling and Design Issues , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Fan Tao,et al.  Prediction of conducted EMI in three phase inverters by simulation method , 2017, 2017 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific).

[17]  Ramin S. Esfandiari,et al.  Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists Using MATLAB , 2013 .

[18]  Jos Arrillaga,et al.  Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation , 2002 .

[19]  Shuiming Chen,et al.  Simulation Analysis on Conducted EMD Caused by Valves in $\pm$ 800 kV UHVDC Converter Station , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[20]  Archana Subramanian,et al.  Analysis and mitigation of EMI in DC-DC converters using QR interaction , 2017, IET Circuits Devices Syst..

[21]  Venkata Dinavahi,et al.  Unified Solver Based Real-Time Multi-Domain Simulation of Aircraft Electro-Mechanical-Actuator , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[22]  Donald L. Skaar,et al.  Using the superposition method to formulate the state variable matrix for linear networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[23]  Paolo Maffezzoni,et al.  A Versatile Time-Domain Approach to Simulate Oscillators in RF Circuits , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[24]  Jih-Sheng Lai,et al.  Inverter EMI modeling and simulation methodologies , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Joseph D. Skufca,et al.  Analysis Still Matters: A Surprising Instance of Failure of Runge-Kutta-Felberg ODE Solvers , 2004, SIAM Rev..