How many times per day should peak expiratory flow rates be assessed when investigating occupational asthma?

BACKGROUND--Serial peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) recording has been advocated as a sensitive and specific means of confirming work related asthma. The optimum number of recordings per day to achieve the best between-reader and within-reader reproducibility and sensitivity/specificity ratio compared with the final diagnosis determined by specific inhalation challenges is unknown. METHODS--PEF recording was carried out every two hours in 74 subjects referred for possible occupational asthma. Specific inhalation challenges performed in a hospital laboratory or at the workplace (positive in 33 subjects and negative in 41) were considered the gold standard. The duration of monitoring at work and away from work was at least two weeks each. Graphs of PEF recordings were generated in four different ways: every two hours, four times/day, three times/day, and every morning and evening. The graphs were assessed by three readers in three different centres in a blind manner. Furthermore, one third of each type of graph was read blind by the same reader one week after the initial interpretation. RESULTS--Agreement between the three readers was a little more frequent (82%) in the case of the every two hour readings than for the other types of readings (70% v 77%). Agreement between at least two of the three readers occurred in 73% of positive challenges (sensitivity) and in 78% of negative challenges (specificity) for every two hour readings. The figures varied from 61% to 70% for positive challenges and from 78% to 88% for negative challenges for the other types of readings. Within-subject reproducibility from one reading to the next (one week apart) was excellent (83% to 100%). CONCLUSIONS--Recording PEF every two hours results in a slightly more satisfactory agreement between readers and in concordance in terms of sensitivity/specificity than less frequent PEF readings, although the four times a day assessment is almost as satisfactory.

[1]  J. Malo,et al.  Reference values of the provocative concentrations of methacholine that cause 6% and 20% changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in a normal population. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[2]  J. Pepys,et al.  Bronchial provocation tests in etiologic diagnosis and analysis of asthma. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[3]  E. Juniper,et al.  Quality of life of subjects with occupational asthma. , 1993, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[4]  J. Malo.  APPLICATION OF PROVOCATIVE CHALLENGE STUDIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA , 1992, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America.

[5]  J. Malo,et al.  Closed-circuit methodology for inhalation challenge tests with isocyanates. , 1992, American Review of Respiratory Disease.

[6]  L. Boulet,et al.  Occupational asthma: validity of monitoring of peak expiratory flow rates and non-allergic bronchial responsiveness as compared to specific inhalation challenge. , 1992, The European respiratory journal.

[7]  J. Malo,et al.  Comparison of peak expiratory flow rate and FEV1 in assessing bronchomotor tone after challenges with occupational sensitizers. , 1991, Chest.

[8]  J. Malo,et al.  Is the clinical history a satisfactory means of diagnosing occupational asthma? , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[9]  K. Wallingford,et al.  Evaluation of occupational asthma from airborne egg protein exposure in multiple settings. , 1990, Chest.

[10]  F. Hargreave,et al.  The assessment and treatment of asthma: a conference report. , 1990, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[11]  M. Chan-yeung,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of PC20 and peak expiratory flow rate in cedar asthma. , 1990, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  A. Woolcock,et al.  Asthma management plan, 1989 , 1989 .

[13]  J. Malo,et al.  Specific serum antibodies against isocyanates: association with occupational asthma. , 1989, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  J. Malo,et al.  New methodology for specific inhalation challenges with occupational agents in powder form. , 1989, The European respiratory journal.

[15]  L. Fabbri,et al.  Persistent asthma due to isocyanates. A follow-up study of subjects with occupational asthma due to toluene diisocyanate (TDI). , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[16]  J. Malo,et al.  Occupational asthma in workers of a pharmaceutical company processing spiramycin. , 1988, Thorax.

[17]  J. Malo,et al.  Occupational asthma and IgE sensitization in a pharmaceutical company processing psyllium. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[18]  J. Malo,et al.  Follow-up of occupational asthma caused by crab and various agents. , 1985, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[19]  P. Burge,et al.  Peak flow rate records in surveys: reproducibility of observers' reports. , 1984, Thorax.

[20]  J. Malo,et al.  Occupational asthma in snow crab-processing workers. , 1984, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[21]  J. Malo,et al.  Monitoring of maximum expiratory peak flow rates and histamine inhalation tests in the investigation of occupational asthma , 1984, Clinical allergy.

[22]  M. Chan-yeung,et al.  Clinical features and natural history of occupational asthma due to western red cedar (Thuja plicata). , 1982, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  S. Tarlo,et al.  Asthma caused by occupational exposure to a furan-based binder system. , 1980, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[24]  P. Burge,et al.  Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to colophony. , 1979, Thorax.

[25]  P. Burge,et al.  Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to isocyanates. , 1979, Thorax.

[26]  F. Hargreave,et al.  Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey , 1977, Clinical allergy.

[27]  British,et al.  Asthma: analysis of sudden deaths and ventilatory arrests in hospital. , 1977, British medical journal.

[28]  M. Chan-yeung,et al.  Occupational asthma and rhinitis due to Western red cedar (Thuja plicata). , 1973, The American review of respiratory disease.

[29]  M. Sim.  Psychiatry for Students , 1970 .

[30]  L. Boulet,et al.  [The Quebec system of indemnification for occupational asthma. Description, efficacy, and costs]. , 1993, Revue des maladies respiratoires.

[31]  Partridge,et al.  International Consensus Report on Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma. , 1992, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[32]  H. Karoui,et al.  [Bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of complicated pulmonary hydatid cyst in children]. , 1984, Revue des maladies respiratoires.

[33]  S Lam,et al.  Nonspecific bronchial reactivity in occupational asthma. , 1979, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[34]  M. Turner‐Warwick.  On observing patterns of airflow obstruction in chronic asthma. , 1977, British journal of diseases of the chest.