Effects of the Visual Fidelity of Virtual Environments on Presence, Context-dependent Forgetting, and Source-monitoring Error

Advances in virtual reality technology have enabled the creation of virtual environments (VEs) with significantly high visual fidelity when compared to real environments (REs). In this study, we use a high-fidelity VE to examine two effects caused by alternating VE and RE experiences: “context-dependent forgetting” and “source-monitoring errors.” The former effect is that memories learned in VEs are more easily recalled in VEs than in REs, whereas memories learned in REs are more easily recalled in REs than in VEs. The source-monitoring error is that memories learned in VEs are easily confused with those learned in REs, making discriminating the source of the memory difficult. We hypothesized that the visual fidelity of VEs is responsible for these effects and conducted an experiment using two types of VEs: a high-fidelity VE created using photogrammetry techniques and low-fidelity VE created with primitive shapes and materials. The results show that the high-fidelity VE significantly improved the sense of presence. However, the level of the visual fidelity of the VEs did not show any effect on context-dependent forgetting and source-monitoring errors. Notably, the null results of the context-dependent forgetting between the VE and RE were strongly supported by Bayesian analysis. Thus, we indicate that context-dependent forgetting does not necessarily occur, which will be helpful for VR-based education and training.

[1]  N. Mulligan,et al.  Immersion, presence, and episodic memory in virtual reality environments , 2021, Memory.

[2]  Maarten H. Lamers,et al.  Changing Between Virtual Reality and Real-World Adversely Affects Memory Recall Accuracy , 2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality.

[3]  Eyal Ofek,et al.  MoveBox: Democratizing MoCap for the Microsoft Rocketbox Avatar Library , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR).

[4]  K. Norman,et al.  Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: On Mars and underwater , 2020, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  The Rocketbox Library and the Utility of Freely Available Rigged Avatars , 2020, Frontiers in Virtual Reality.

[6]  Valentin Schwind,et al.  Inconsistencies of Presence Questionnaires in Virtual Reality , 2020, VRST.

[7]  Marius Rubo,et al.  The Human Source Memory System struggles to distinguish Virtual Reality and Reality , 2020, Computers in Human Behavior Reports.

[8]  T. Isarida,et al.  Video context-dependent effects in recognition memory , 2020 .

[9]  Takuji Narumi,et al.  Do You Feel Like Passing Through Walls?: Effect of Self-Avatar Appearance on Facilitating Realistic Behavior in Virtual Environments , 2020, CHI.

[10]  C. Ranganath,et al.  Resurrected memories: Sleep-dependent memory consolidation saves memories from competition induced by retrieval practice , 2019, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[11]  S. Smith,et al.  Virtual reality in episodic memory research: A review , 2019, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[12]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Improved Memory Elicitation in Virtual Reality: New Experimental Results and Insights , 2017, INTERACT.

[13]  T. Isarida,et al.  Reexamination of Mood-Mediation Hypothesis of Background-Music-Dependent Effects in Free Recall , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence , 2016 .

[15]  Toshiko K. Isarida,et al.  Odor-context effects in free recall after a short retention interval: A new methodology for controlling adaptation , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[16]  E. Masicampo,et al.  Imagining another context during encoding offsets context-dependent forgetting. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Video context-dependent recall , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[18]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences , 2007 .

[19]  Tony O’Hagan Bayes factors , 2006 .

[20]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Takeo Isarida,et al.  Effects of environmental context manipulated by the combination of place and task on free recall , 2004, Memory.

[22]  A. Rutherford Environmental Context-Dependent Recognition Memory Effects: An Examination of ICE Model and Cue-Overload Hypotheses , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  S. Cooper,et al.  Eliminating Context-Dependent Forgetting: Changing Contexts can be as Effective as Reinstating Them , 2003 .

[24]  Paul Zimmons,et al.  The influence of rendering quality on presence and task performance in a virtual environment , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[25]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[26]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[27]  Azucena García-Palacios,et al.  Virtual Reality Monitoring: Phenomenal Characteristics of Real, Virtual, and False Memories , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[29]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[32]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[33]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[34]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[35]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[36]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[37]  Steven M. Smith MOOD IS A COMPONENT OF MENTAL CONTEXT: COMMENT ON EICH (1995) , 1995 .

[38]  E. Eich Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .

[41]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[42]  Swen E. Gaudl,et al.  Walking Through Virtual Doors: A Study on the Effects of Virtual Location Changes on Memory , 2021, ICAT-EGVE.

[43]  Steven M. Smith Effects of Environmental Context on Human Memory , 2014 .

[44]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Presence and Memory : Immersive Virtual Reality Effects on Cued Recall , 2012 .

[45]  H. Hoijtink,et al.  Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses. , 2008 .

[46]  P. Anderson,et al.  The role of presence in virtual reality exposure therapy. , 2007, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[47]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  Steven M. Smith Environmental context—dependent memory. , 1988 .