Double-Layer Network Negative Public Opinion Information Propagation Modeling Based on Continuous-Time Markov Chain

In view of the fact that the existing public opinion propagation aspects are mostly based on single-layer propagation network, these works rarely consider the double-layer network structure and the negative opinion evolution. This paper proposes a new susceptible-infected-vaccinated-susceptible negative opinion information propagation model with preventive vaccination by constructing double-layer network topology. Firstly, the continuous-time Markov chain is used to simulate the negative public opinion information propagation process and the nonlinear dynamic equation of the model is derived; secondly, the steady state condition of the virus propagation in the model is proposed and mathematically proved; finally, Monte Carlo method is applied in the proposed model. The parameters of simulation model have an effect on negative public opinion information propagation, the derivation results are verified by computer simulation. The simulation results show that the proposed model has a larger threshold of public opinion information propagation and has more effective control of the scale of negative public opinion; it also can reduce the density of negative public opinion information propagation and suppress negative public opinion information compared with the traditional susceptible infected susceptible model. It also can provide the scientific method and research approach based on probability statistics for the study of negative public opinion information propagation in complex networks.

[1]  Zhen Jin,et al.  Pattern Dynamics of an SIS Epidemic Model with Nonlocal Delay , 2019, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[2]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Opinion Behavior Analysis in Social Networks Under the Influence of Coopetitive Media , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[3]  Arno Siebes,et al.  Imprecise continuous-time Markov chains , 2016, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  Jianping Fan,et al.  Ranking influential nodes in social networks based on node position and neighborhood , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[5]  J. Watmough,et al.  Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[6]  Frédéric Boyer,et al.  Poincaré’s Equations for Cosserat Media: Application to Shells , 2017, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[7]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Gerardo I. Simari,et al.  Reasoning about Sentiment and Knowledge Diffusion in Social Networks , 2017, IEEE Internet Computing.

[9]  Giancarlo Ruffo,et al.  Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking , 2016, Journal of Computational Social Science.

[10]  Xue-Gang Chen,et al.  Research on trend prediction and evaluation of network public opinion , 2017, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[11]  Mark Goh,et al.  Cross-network dissemination model of public opinion in coupled networks , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Weiming Wang,et al.  Stochastic persistence and stationary distribution in an SIS epidemic model with media coverage , 2017, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[13]  Kwame Awuah-Offei,et al.  Agent-based modeling framework for modeling the effect of information diffusion on community acceptance of mining , 2017 .

[14]  A. J. Morales,et al.  Efficiency of human activity on information spreading on Twitter , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[15]  Zhixiao Wang,et al.  SPIR: The potential spreaders involved SIR model for information diffusion in social networks , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[16]  Gang Xie,et al.  Efficient identification of node importance in social networks , 2016, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Integrated agent-based microsimulation framework for examining impacts of mobility-oriented policies , 2020, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Jiaowan Luo,et al.  Stationary distribution and extinction of SIR model with nonlinear incident rate under Markovian switching , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[19]  Heinrich Saller Quantum Relativity , 2017 .

[20]  Zhang Feng Hot news mining and public opinion guidance analysis based on sentiment computing in network social media , 2018, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Norman J. Seeger,et al.  Equity index variance: Evidence from flexible parametric jump–diffusion models , 2017 .

[22]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Dynamic emotion modelling and anomaly detection in conversation based on emotional transition tensor , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[23]  Jesus R. Artalejo,et al.  The maximum number of infected individuals in SIS epidemic models: Computational techniques and quasi-stationary distributions , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[24]  Jasper De Bock The Limit Behaviour of Imprecise Continuous-Time Markov Chains , 2016, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[25]  Omri Gillath,et al.  Attachment and social networks. , 2018, Current opinion in psychology.

[26]  Xiaolin Li,et al.  Maximizing positive influence spread in online social networks via fluid dynamics , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[27]  Mung Chiang,et al.  IEEE TNSE Inaugural Issue Editorial , 2014, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng..

[28]  Prashant K Srivastava,et al.  Delayed information induces oscillations in a dynamical model for infectious disease , 2019, International Journal of Biomathematics.

[29]  Meijing Shan,et al.  A stochastic SIS epidemic model with vaccination , 2017 .

[30]  Raúl Monroy,et al.  Fusing pattern discovery and visual analytics approaches in tweet propagation , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[31]  Zaki Malik,et al.  Understanding the relationship strengths in users' activities, review helpfulness and influence , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Rosa Di Salvo,et al.  (H,ρ)–Induced Political Dynamics: Facets of the Disloyal Attitudes Into the Public Opinion , 2017, 2108.00403.

[33]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Distributed Topology Manipulation to Control Epidemic Spreading Over Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.