Goal, Event, and State Inferences: An Investigation of Inference Generation During Story Comprehension

Publisher Summary Recently, there has been a considerable interest in identifying knowledge-based inferences that are generated during story comprehension. Some types of inferences are generated as readers comprehend a passage, whereas other types of inferences are generated after comprehension Graesser and Clark (1985) have developed a model of narrative comprehension that makes specific predictions about the types of inferences that are generated during short story comprehension. Knowledge-based inferences include states, events, actions, and goals that are associated with relevant generic knowledge structures A number of comprehension models have addressed the notion that activation from multiple information sources enhances inference generation. Referential bridging inferences include (1) inferences specifying that the same word across two propositions refers to the same concept and (2) inferences specifying that an anaphor and its antecedent refer to the same concept. Equally important for a coherent text representation are causal bridging inferences. Causal bridging inferences establish a causal connection between the current sentence and the preceding text.

[1]  John B. Black,et al.  Types of inferences generated during reading , 1985 .

[2]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Instrument inferences in sentence encoding. , 1978 .

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Depth of Automatic Spreading Activation: Mediated Priming Effects in Pronunciation but Not in Lexical Decision , 1986 .

[4]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in instrumental inference , 1981 .

[5]  A. Graesser,et al.  Answers to why-questions expose the organization of story plot and predict recall of actions , 1980 .

[6]  M. Singer,et al.  Inferring consequences in story comprehension , 1983 .

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Incorporating inferences in narrative representations: A study of how and why , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  How to catch a fish: The memory and representation of common procedures∗ , 1978 .

[9]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[10]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Word Recognition in a Functional Context: The Use of Scripts in Reading. , 1985 .

[11]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events , 1985 .

[12]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory , 1982 .

[13]  Frank R. Yekovich,et al.  Script-based inferences: Effects of text and knowledge variables on recognition memory , 1984 .

[14]  J. Keenan,et al.  The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory , 1984 .

[15]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference , 1980 .

[17]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. , 1983 .