Simple computational methods of the AP algorithm for maximum likelihood localization of multiple radiating sources

Two computational algorithms that reduce significantly the computational complexity per iteration of the alternating projection (AP) algorithm are presented. One is a recursive projection algorithm that utilizes the projection matrix updating formula, and the other is a maximum eigenvector approximation algorithm that approximates the Hermitian maximization problem in every iteration as the problem of maximizing the modulus of the projection onto the maximum eigenvector subspace. By transforming the computation of Hermitian forms into that of only inner products of vectors, these algorithms significantly reduce the computational complexity without noticeable loss in the estimation performance and convergence behavior. Computer simulation results that validate this approximation are included. >

[1]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Array signal processing , 1985 .

[2]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[3]  R. Kumaresan,et al.  Estimating the Angles of Arrival of Multiple Plane Waves , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[5]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Maximum likelihood methods for direction-of-arrival estimation , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[6]  C. K. Un,et al.  Computationally efficient maximum likelihood algorithm for localising multiple sources , 1989 .

[7]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[8]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[9]  G. Stewart Introduction to matrix computations , 1973 .

[10]  Fred C. Schweppe,et al.  Sensor-array data processing for multiple-signal sources , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations-a maximum likelihood approach , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[12]  U. Nickel,et al.  Angular superresolution with phased array radar: a review of algorithms and operational constraints , 1987 .

[13]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[14]  Harold W. Sorenson,et al.  Parameter estimation: Principles and problems , 1980 .

[15]  Donald W. Tufts,et al.  Simple, effective computation of principal eigenvectors and their eigenvalues and application to high-resolution estimation of frequencies , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[16]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Maximum likelihood array processing for the estimation of superimposed signals , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Performance study of conditional and unconditional direction-of-arrival estimation , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[18]  Ehud Weinstein,et al.  Parameter estimation of superimposed signals using the EM algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..