Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part I: Condensation silicones.

1. Although condensation silicone elastomers can be used to produce multiple dies from a single impression, one can expect changes in dimensions of dies produced from successive pours. 2. Putty/wash systems exhibit variable behavior among different brands. Some products produce a series of dies of increasing diameter over a 4-day period, while other brands may produce a series of dies whose diameters decrease as they are successively poured. 3. Light-body wash silicone impressions made in adhesive-lined custom acrylic resin trays produce dies which increase in diameter with time. 4. Putty/wash system, in general, show a greater eccentricity of dies than is seen with custom-tray/adhesive/wash systems, but there were some significant exceptions among the brands tested. 5. There does not appear to be any difference in behavior between single-wash and double-mix techniques in the condensation-silicone systems. 6. For maximum accuracy, the condensation-silicone systems should be poured as soon as possible after making the impression.

[1]  A G Podshadley,et al.  Accuracy of casts produced from seven rubber impression materials. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  G. Dickson,et al.  Physical properties of synthetic-rubber-base dental impression materials. , 1960, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  M. H. Reisbick,et al.  Effect of Viscosity on the Accuracy and Stability of Elastic Impression Materials , 1973, Journal of dental research.

[4]  Takao Fusayama,et al.  Distortion of irreversible hydrocolloid and mercaptan rubber-base impressions , 1961 .

[5]  A. G. James Maintenance of Equilibrium in Reversible Hydrocolloid Impressions , 1949, Journal of dental research.

[6]  C. Fairhurst,et al.  Elastic properties of rubber base impression materials , 1956 .

[7]  J A Stackhouse,et al.  A comparison of elastic impression materials. , 1975, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  H. F. Sawyer,et al.  Accuracy of a mercaptan rubber impression technique using a stock tray. , 1971, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  J A Stackhouse,et al.  The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials. , 1970, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  A G Podshadley,et al.  Accuracy of relined mercaptan-rubber impressions. , 1970, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  R. J. Schnell,et al.  Dimensional stability of rubber base impressions and certain other factors affecting accuracy. , 1958, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  K. D. Jørgensen Thiokol as a dental impression material , 1957 .

[13]  R. J. Schnell,et al.  Factors influencing the accuracy of silicone impression materials , 1959 .

[14]  T. M. Kaloyannides,et al.  Elasticity of Impression Materials: IV. Permanent Deformation as a Function of Time , 1975, Journal of dental research.

[15]  J. Matyas,et al.  The accuracy of highly filled elastomeric impression materials , 1975 .