Disentangling the Influence of Knowledge on Processing Strategies in Choice Modelling

This paper seeks to disentangle the effect of knowledge on processing strategies using data from a discrete choice experiment on cold-water corals in Norway. Cold-water corals are a deep-sea ecosystem for which we have limited scientific knowledge and for which public awareness is low, and consequently is likely to be an unfamiliar good to many members of the public. One simplifying strategy often employed by respondents in a choice experiment is to simply ignore some of the attributes, i.e. attribute non-attendance. After the initial presentation of the good, before answering the choice cards, the respondents were given a quiz over the material covered in the presentation. This provides us with an ex ante measure of their knowledge. We use a combination of discrete and continuous mixture models to disentangle the effects of variations in knowledge about the good. We use a respondent’s quiz score as covariates in the probability function of attending to an attribute. Our results show that knowledge, as measured by the quiz score, has a significant effect on the probability of attending to the attribute for three out of four attributes. This has direct implication for practitioners in that proper information may help avoid the use of simplifying strategies.

[1]  A. Kosenius Preference discontinuity in choice experiment: Determinants and implications , 2013 .

[2]  John W. Polak,et al.  A systematic comparison of continuous and discrete mixture models , 2007 .

[3]  N. Hanley,et al.  Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches , 2002 .

[4]  D. Campbell,et al.  Examining labelling effects within discrete choice experiments: an application to recreational site choice. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  P. B. Mortensen,et al.  The deep-water coral Lophelia pertusa in Norwegian waters: distribution and fishery impacts , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification , 2011 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling , 2002 .

[8]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modeling at the "market stall": Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation , 2007 .

[9]  Nick Hanley,et al.  What are the consequences of ignoring attributes in choice experiments? Implications for ecosystem service valuation , 2013 .

[10]  D. Hensher How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load , 2006 .

[11]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models , 2009 .

[12]  D. Hensher,et al.  Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates , 2005 .

[13]  D. Campbell,et al.  Combining discrete and continuous mixing approaches to accommodate heterogeneity in price sensitivities in environmental choice analysis , 2010 .

[14]  N. Hanley,et al.  Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: Preserving cold-water coral in Norway , 2015 .

[15]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation , 2009 .

[16]  Nick Hanley,et al.  The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good , 2014 .

[17]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes , 2004 .

[18]  D. Campbell,et al.  Accommodating attribute processing strategies in stated choice analysis: do respondents do what they say they do? , 2009 .