Closed-loop control of muscle length through motor unit recruitment in load-moving conditions.

Neuroprostheses aimed at restoring lost movement in the limbs of spinal cord injured individuals are being developed in this laboratory. As part of this program, we have designed a digital proportional-integral-derivative controller integrated with a stimulation system which effects recruitment of motor units according to the size principle. This system is intended to control muscle length while shortening against fixed loads. Feline sciatic nerves were exposed and stimulated with ramp, triangular, sinusoidal, staircase and random signals as test inputs. Changes in muscle length and effective time delay under different conditions were measured and analyzed. Differences of tracking quality between open- and closed-loop conditions were examined through analysis of variance as well as the differences between small (250g) and large (1kg) loads. The results showed that parameters used to compare muscle length output to the input signals were dramatically improved in the closed-loop trials as compared to the open-loop condition. Mean squared correlation coefficients between input and output signals for ramp signals increased by 0.019, and for triangular signals by 0.12. Mean peak cross correlation between input and output signals for sinusoidal waveforms increased by 0.06, with decreases in time to peak cross correlation (effective time delay) from 195 to 38ms. In slow random signals (power up to 0.5Hz), peak cross correlation went from 0.74 to 0.89, and time-to-peak cross correlation decreased from 205 to 55ms. In fast random signals (power up to 1Hz), peak cross correlation went from 0.82 to 0.89, and time-to-peak cross correlation from 200 to 65ms. For staircase signals, both rise times and mean steady-state errors decreased. It was found that, once the length range was set, the load weight had no effect on tracking performance. Analysis of mean square error demonstrated that for all signals tested, the feedback decreased the tracking error significantly, whereas, again, load had no effect. The results suggest that tracking is vastly improved by using a closed-loop system to control muscle length, and that load does not affect the quality of signal tracking as measured by standard control system analysis methods.

[1]  K. Horch,et al.  Information contained in sensory nerve recordings made with intrafascicular electrodes , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  R. Stein,et al.  Neural prostheses : replacing motor function after disease or disability , 1992 .

[3]  A. Kralj,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation: Standing and Walking after Spinal Cord Injury , 1989 .

[4]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Evaluation of isometric antagonist coactivation strategies of electrically stimulated muscles , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Dynamic performance of a load-moving skeletal muscle. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  P. Crago,et al.  Feedback control methods for task regulation by electrical stimulation of muscles , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  The influence of antagonist muscle control strategies on the isometric frequency response of the cat's ankle joint , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Moshe Solomonow,et al.  External Control of the Neuromuscular System , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Moshe Solomonow,et al.  Manipulation of Muscle Force with Various Firing Rate and Recruitment Control Strategies , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  D.B. Popovic,et al.  Sensory nerve recording for closed-loop control to restore motor functions , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  L. D. Partridge,et al.  Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle. , 1966, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  K. Horch,et al.  Closed-loop control of ankle position using muscle afferent feedback with functional neuromuscular stimulation , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  M Solomonow,et al.  Force feedback control of motor unit recruitment in isometric muscle. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  J. Houk,et al.  An evaluation of length and force feedback to soleus muscles of decerebrate cats. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Evaluation of antagonist coactivation strategies elicited from electrically stimulated muscles under load-moving conditions , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Orderly stimulation of skeletal muscle motor units with tripolar nerve cuff electrode , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M Ichie,et al.  Electromyogram analysis and electrical stimulation control of paralysed wrist and hand. , 1995, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.