Accounting for drivers' bicycling frequency and familiarity with bicycle infrastructure treatments when evaluating safety.

Municipalities in the United States often encourage bicycling for the health, economic, and environmental benefits by implementing new and innovative bicycle infrastructure treatments. Unfortunately, many treatments are unfamiliar to or misunderstood by drivers, especially when lacking explicit rules (e.g., shared lanes). To date, research has largely investigated bicycle infrastructure from a bicyclist's perspective, but with little research from the driver's perspective. The objective of this research is to utilize a driving simulator to investigate driver behavior towards different bicycle infrastructure treatments when driver behavior is not provoked by an interaction with bicyclists. More specifically, this research intends to investigate the impact of bicycling frequency and treatment familiarity, as well as the combined effect of the two, on driver behavior at each treatment type. The treatments investigated are shared lane markings called "sharrows", standard bike lanes, bike boxes, and merge lanes. The results show that bicycling frequency significantly affects the proportion of drivers making eye glances at treatments. In addition, drivers more familiar with bike boxes stopped significantly further back from bike boxes, and drivers more familiar with merge lanes performed the merge maneuver significantly earlier. Furthermore, driver speed and lane positioning at bike lanes was significantly affected by the combination of bike lane familiarity and bicycling frequency, but not individually. This research is a first step towards understanding driver behavior and expectation of bicyclists; an essential understanding for infrastructure treatments that do not provide physical barriers between bicycles and automobiles, and instead rely on driver behavior for safety.

[1]  M. Harris,et al.  Impact of Transportation Infrastructure on Bicycling Injuries and Crashes : a Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[2]  Randy B Machemehl,et al.  Effects of Bicycle Boxes on Bicyclist and Motorist Behavior at Intersections in Austin, Texas , 2011 .

[3]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types on Perceived Comfort and Safety of Bicyclists and Potential Bicyclists , 2015 .

[4]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Four Types of Cyclists? , 2013 .

[5]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  User Behavior and Perceptions at Intersections with Turning and Mixing Zones on Protected Bike Lanes , 2015 .

[6]  Christopher M Monsere,et al.  A simulator-based analysis of engineering treatments for right-hook bicycle crashes at signalized intersections. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Erick Guerra,et al.  Where do bike lanes work best? A Bayesian spatial model of bicycle lanes and bicycle crashes. , 2017, Safety science.

[8]  Eleni Christofa,et al.  A mixed methods investigation of bicycle exposure in crash rates. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  K Rayner,et al.  Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Corinne Peek-Asa,et al.  On-road bicycle facilities and bicycle crashes in Iowa, 2007-2010. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  H Summala,et al.  Bicycle accidents and drivers' visual search at left and right turns. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Marco Dozza,et al.  How do drivers overtake cyclists? , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Heather Rothenberg,et al.  Separated Bike Lane Crash Analysis , 2016 .

[15]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Investigation of the Effect of Super Sharrows on Cyclist and Vehicle Behavior , 2017 .

[17]  Vanessa Beanland,et al.  Do cyclists make better drivers? Associations between cycling experience and change detection in road scenes. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Car Driver and Bicyclist Behavior at Bicycle Crossings Under Different Priority Regulations , 1999 .

[19]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Safety in numbers? Investigating Australian driver behaviour, knowledge and attitudes towards cyclists. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Safety Diagnosis of Vehicle–Bicycle Interactions Using Computer Vision Analysis , 2013 .

[22]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Operational Evaluation of Central Sharrows and Dooring Zone Treatment on Road User Behavior in Ottawa, Canada , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[23]  Stuart Vaughan Newstead,et al.  Painting a Designated Space: Cyclist and Driver Compliance at Cycling Infrastructure at Intersections , 2010 .

[24]  D. Hurwitz,et al.  The role of driver’s situational awareness on right-hook bicycle-motor vehicle crashes , 2018, Safety Science.

[25]  H Summala,et al.  Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: an in-depth study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Lars Åberg,et al.  Driver Behaviour in Intersections: Formal and Informal Traffic Rules , 2005 .

[28]  Rebecca L Sanders Dissecting Perceived Traffic Risk as a Barrier to Adult Bicycling , 2013 .

[29]  Ilpo Kojo,et al.  Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  Jennifer Duthie,et al.  Analysis of Factors Influencing Bicycle–Vehicle Interactions on Urban Roadways by Ordered Probit Regression , 2012 .

[31]  Jeroen Hogema,et al.  The Effects of Cyclists Present at Rural Intersections on Speed Behavior and Workload of Car Drivers: A Driving Simulator Study , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[32]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  Bicyclist’s perceived level of comfort in dense urban environments: How do ambient traffic, engineering treatments, and bicyclist characteristics relate? , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[33]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search , 2001, Vision Research.

[34]  Lei Yu,et al.  Designing right-turn vehicle box as a supplemental treatment to eliminate conflicts with pedestrians and bicycles , 2016 .

[35]  Randy B Machemehl,et al.  Effects of Shared Lane Markings on Bicyclist and Motorist Behavior , 2010 .

[36]  D. Rubin Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years , 1996 .

[37]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  The Dutch road to a high level of cycling safety , 2017 .

[38]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[39]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[40]  Harry Lahrmann,et al.  Comparison of five bicycle facility designs in signalized intersections using traffic conflict studies , 2017 .

[41]  Nicole Foletta,et al.  Green Shared Lane Markings on Urban Arterial in Oakland, California , 2015 .

[42]  Jill F. Cooper,et al.  We All Want the Same Thing Results from a Roadway Design Survey of Pedestrians, Drivers, Bicyclists, and Transit Users in the Bay Area , 2012 .

[43]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings in Cambridge, Massachusetts , 2011 .