Envisioning Opportunities for Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas

Abstract In urban planning, peri-urban areas are often addressed with an urban-centric view on development, disregarding the multifunctional and dynamic opportunities that these spaces offer. As a consequence, we argue that land use functions such as agriculture do not reach their full potential, despite the increasing enthusiasm for peri-urban and urban agriculture. This chapter has a twofold structure: first it explores the opportunities and challenges for agriculture in peri-urban areas; and second, it studies success factors for envisioning processes promoting peri-urban agriculture in urban policy and planning. Through action research, we gather and compare data from two envisioning processes in the Flemish cities of Ghent and Kortrijk. Both processes were initiated by the local authorities, with the purpose of developing a spatial vision for agriculture in peri-urban areas. Results show that in both contexts, pressure on farmland is a key issue. In addition, we highlight that multifunctionality is rather complex, both in practice and from a governance perspective, but nevertheless promising as a territorial concept in envisioning processes. Regarding the envisioning process itself, the analysis shows that clarity and consensus on the objectives of the process, delineation of the study area, policy support, clear leadership, and inserting sound and reliable data into the process are important success factors. This chapter provides insight into the visions, plans and strategies needed to embrace the potential of agriculture in peri-urban areas, through the exploration and valuation of participatory envisioning processes. Future research is needed to explore the implementation phases of envisioning processes in urban planning.

[1]  D. Simon.  Urban Environments: Issues on the Peri-Urban Fringe , 2008 .

[2]  C. Bryant,et al.  Agriculture and Innovation in the Urban Fringe: The Case of Organic Farming in Quebec, Canada , 1999 .

[3]  J. Duke,et al.  Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[4]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders , 2013 .

[5]  Editorial: Pathways towards Local Scale Policy Integration in Agricultural Landscapes , 2014 .

[6]  Claudia Carter,et al.  Disintegrated development at the rural–urban fringe: Re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice , 2013 .

[7]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  C. Persson,et al.  Planning approaches for rurban areas: Case studies from Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands , 2009 .

[9]  Joost Dessein,et al.  The organisation of complexity: a set of five components to organise the social interface of rural policy making , 2013 .

[10]  H. Gulinck,et al.  Putting domestic gardens on the agenda using empirical spatial data: The case of Flanders , 2014 .

[11]  Mark E. Lichtenstein,et al.  Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century , 2004 .

[12]  Hubert Gulinck,et al.  Virtual farmland: Grasping the occupation of agricultural land by non-agricultural land uses , 2015 .

[13]  Mamen Cuéllar-Padilla,et al.  Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia , 2011 .

[14]  E. Rogge,et al.  How to visualise the invisible: Revealing re-use of rural buildings by non-agricultural entrepreneurs in the region of Roeselare–Tielt (Belgium) , 2012 .

[15]  T. Pinto-Correia,et al.  Linking research to practice: The landscape as the basis for integrating social and ecological perspectives of the rural , 2013 .

[16]  Mattias Qviström.  Shadows of planning: on landscape/planning history and inherited landscape ambiguities at the urban fringe , 2010 .

[17]  A. Scott.  Focussing in on focus groups: Effective participative tools or cheap fixes for land use policy? , 2011 .

[18]  J. Dessein,et al.  Perceptions of a small farming community on land use change and a changing countryside: A case-study from Flanders , 2015 .

[19]  J. Esparcia,et al.  The Context of Rural–Urban Relationships in Finland, France, Hungary, The Netherlands and Spain , 2009 .

[20]  T. Champion.  Urbanization, Suburbanization, Counterurbanization and Reurbanization , 2001 .

[21]  Dave Kendal,et al.  Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land , 2013 .

[22]  F. McKenzie,et al.  Peri-urban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: Insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) , 2013 .

[23]  A. Gilg,et al.  Quality farm food in Europe : A possible alternative to the industrialised food market and to current agri-environmental policies : Lessons from France , 1998 .

[24]  F. Hermans,et al.  Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development , 2011 .

[25]  J. Dessein,et al.  Using the rural web in dialogue with regional stakeholders , 2013 .

[26]  Ingo Zasada,et al.  Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming , 2011 .

[27]  J. Ravetz,et al.  The Dynamics of Peri-Urbanization , 2013 .

[28]  J. Primdahl.  Agricultural Landscape Sustainability under Pressure: Policy Developments and Landscape Change , 2014 .

[29]  Mattias Qviström.  Landscapes out of order: studying the inner urban fringe beyond the rural – urban divide , 2007 .

[30]  Jayne Glass,et al.  The power of the process: Co-producing a sustainability assessment toolkit for upland estate management in Scotland , 2013 .

[31]  C. Cocklin,et al.  From market to multifunctionality? Land stewardship in Australia , 2006 .

[32]  A. Reenberg,et al.  Land system changes in the context of urbanisation: Examples from the peri-urban area of Greater Copenhagen , 2006 .

[33]  Simon Bell,et al.  Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe , 2013 .

[34]  P. Deuffic,et al.  Farming and Landscape Management: How French Farmers are Coping with the Ecologization of Their Activities , 2006 .

[35]  S. Lovell,et al.  Agricultural buffers at the rural-urban fringe: An examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States , 2004 .