Spatial coincidence of intentional actions modulates an implicit visuomotor control.

We investigated a visuomotor mechanism contributing to reach correction: the manual following response (MFR), which is a quick response to background visual motion that frequently occurs as a reafference when the body moves. Although several visual specificities of the MFR have been elucidated, the functional and computational mechanisms of its motor coordination remain unclear mainly because it involves complex relationships among gaze, reaching target, and visual stimuli. To directly explore how these factors interact in the MFR, we assessed the impact of spatial coincidences among gaze, arm reaching, and visual motion on the MFR. When gaze location was displaced from the reaching target with an identical visual motion kept on the retina, the amplitude of the MFR significantly decreased as displacement increased. A factorial manipulation of gaze, reaching-target, and visual motion locations showed that the response decrease is due to the spatial separation between gaze and reaching target but is not due to the spatial separation between visual motion and reaching target. Additionally, elimination of visual motion around the fovea attenuated the MFR. The effects of these spatial coincidences on the MFR are completely different from their effects on the perceptual mislocalization of targets caused by visual motion. Furthermore, we found clear differences between the modulation sensitivities of the MFR and the ocular following response to spatial mismatch between gaze and reaching locations. These results suggest that the MFR modulation observed in our experiment is not due to changes in visual interaction between target and visual motion or to modulation of motion sensitivity in early visual processing. Instead the motor command of the MFR appears to be modulated by the spatial relationship between gaze and reaching.

[1]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Initial ocular following in humans: A response to first-order motion energy , 2005, Vision Research.

[2]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Task-dependent influences of attention on the activation of human primary visual cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[4]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Hiroaki Gomi,et al.  Implicit Visuomotor Processing for Quick Online Reactions Is Robust against Aging , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Szonya Durant,et al.  Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position , 2004, Vision Research.

[7]  H. Gomi.  Implicit online corrections of reaching movements , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Aya Takemura,et al.  Neuronal responses in MST reflect the post-saccadic enhancement of short-latency ocular following responses , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  A P Batista,et al.  Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. , 1999, Science.

[10]  J F Kalaska,et al.  Integration of predictive feedforward and sensory feedback signals for online control of visually guided movement. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[12]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  F. Miles,et al.  Visual stabilization of the eyes in primates , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Spatiotemporal Tuning of Rapid Interactions between Visual-Motion Analysis and Reaching Movement , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  B. Day,et al.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J. Crawford,et al.  Gaze-Centered Remapping of Remembered Visual Space in an Open-Loop Pointing Task , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Vilis,et al.  Gaze-Centered Updating of Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Large-Field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Interaction between colour and motion in human vision , 1987, Nature.

[23]  Selective activation of human cortical area V5A by a rotating visual stimulus in fMRI; implication of attentional mechanisms , 1998, Neuroreport.

[24]  Aya Takemura,et al.  MST neurons code for visual motion in space independent of pursuit eye movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  F A Miles,et al.  Short latency ocular-following responses in man , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[29]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object , 2003, Nature.

[30]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[34]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.

[35]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[36]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrasts, smaller eccentricities, and larger inducer sizes , 1993, Vision Research.

[37]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Anticipatory Gain Modulation in Preparation for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  W Pieter Medendorp,et al.  Behavioral reference frames for planning human reaching movements. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  David Whitney,et al.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  F A Miles,et al.  Initial Ocular Following in Humans Depends Critically on the Fourier Components of the Motion Stimulus , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.