Charting Sociotechnical Dimensions of Values for Design Research

The relationship of values to technology is an important topic in the fields of information studies, human–computer interaction, media studies, and science and technology studies, but definitions and attributes of values differ within and among these fields. We suggest that researchers currently conflate multiple categories when they discuss values. Some of these categories are attributes of the source of values (i.e., people, systems, and hybrid assemblages), and others are attributes of the values themselves. This article disambiguates values in sociotechnical systems by providing a framework to describe where and how values are negotiated and enacted by people, institutions, and technology. The framework includes three dimensions that pertain to the source of values (agency, unit, and assemblage) and three dimensions that pertain to attributes of values (salience, intention, and enactment) to enable precision and comparison across this research trajectory. We illustrate each dimension with examples from the values and design literature.

[1]  B. Latour.  A Cautious Prometheus ? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design , 2009 .

[2]  Don Ihde,et al.  Technology and the lifeworld , 1990 .

[3]  W. Rostow,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Action , 1953, World Politics.

[4]  William A. Wallace,et al.  The Values of Computational Modelers and Professional Codes of Ethics: Results from a Field Study , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  R. Kling,et al.  Book Review: Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1991 .

[6]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Developing privacy guidelines for social location disclosure applications and services , 2005, SOUPS '05.

[7]  William A. Wallace,et al.  How values can reduce conflicts in the design process: Results from a multi-site mixed-method field study , 2011, ASIST.

[8]  Deborah G. Johnson.  Is the global information infrastructure a democratic technology? , 1997, CSOC.

[9]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Developing a meta-inventory of human values , 2010, ASIST.

[10]  T. Peters.  Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices (2nd Ed.), edited by Rob Kling , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, Extended Abstracts Volume, Boston, MA, USA, April 4-9, 2009 , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Bias in computer systems , 1996, TOIS.

[13]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical design communities , 2009 .

[14]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Sociotechnical Interaction and Cyborg–Cyborg Interaction: Transforming the Scale and Convergence of HCI , 2009, Inf. Soc..

[15]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions , 2007 .

[16]  Bryan Pfaffenberger,et al.  Technological Dramas , 1992 .

[17]  Julie E. Cohen.  Configuring the Networked Self - Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice , 2012 .

[18]  Jameson M. Wetmore.  Amish Technology: Reinforcing values and building community , 2007, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[19]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  New Design Methods for Activist Gaming , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[20]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Values Levers , 2013 .

[21]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Computational Modeling and Human Values: A Comparative Study of Corporate, Academic, and Government Research Labs , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  Studying the values of hard-to-reach populations: content analysis of tweets by the 21st century homeless , 2012, iConference '12.

[23]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  Improving the safety of homeless young people with mobile phones: values, form and function , 2011, CHI.

[24]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Digital libraries and human values: Human-computer interaction meets social informatics , 2008, ASIST.

[25]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  Classifying values in informal communication: Adapting the meta-inventory of human values for tweets , 2011, ASIST.

[26]  William W. Gaver.  Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[27]  S. Schwartz.  Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. , 2007 .

[28]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[29]  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,et al.  The Phenomenology of Mind , 1911, Nature.

[30]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[31]  Ping Wang,et al.  Automatic classification of human values: Applying computational thinking to information ethics , 2009, ASIST.

[32]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[33]  Emma Felton,et al.  Design and ethics : reflections on practice , 2012 .

[34]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Ethical implications of values embedded in computational models: An exploratory study , 2007, ASIST.

[35]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design–Use Interface , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[36]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[37]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Affordances in HCI: toward a mediated action perspective , 2012, CHI.

[38]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  The Evolution of Agency: Spectra of Bioagency and Cyberagency , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[39]  Katie Shilton.  Technology development with an agenda: Interventions to emphasize values in design , 2010, ASIST.

[40]  Philip Brey,et al.  Method in computer ethics: Towards a multi-level interdisciplinary approach , 1999, Ethics and Information Technology.

[41]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[43]  Nasrin Rahmati.  The impact of Cultural Values on Computer Mediated Groupwork , 2000 .

[44]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[45]  D. Haraway.  A Cyborg Manifesto , 2013 .

[46]  Kai A. Olsen,et al.  Democracy and Technology , 2011, Computer.

[47]  Jessica K. Miller,et al.  Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system , 2007, GROUP.

[48]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Collaborative learning of ethical decision-making via simulated cases , 2011, iConference '11.

[49]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[50]  K. Himma.  A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[51]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents , 1993, Computer.

[52]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[53]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Information Ethics Education for a Multicultural World , 2011, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[54]  J. Piliavin,et al.  Values: Reviving a Dormant Concept , 2004 .

[55]  M. Flanagan,et al.  Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice , 2008 .

[56]  Helen Z. Margetts,et al.  Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  Finn Brunton,et al.  Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political theory of obfuscation , 2011, First Monday.

[58]  R. Kling,et al.  The Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements , 1988 .

[59]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Designing Educational Cases for Intercultural Information Ethics: The Importance of Diversity, Perspectives, Values, and Pluralism , 2009 .

[60]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[61]  E. G. Coleman,et al.  Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking , 2012 .

[62]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  CareLog: a selective archiving tool for behavior management in schools , 2008, CHI.

[63]  Christine L Borgman,et al.  Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration , 2011, Social studies of science.

[64]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[65]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[66]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[67]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  Homeless young people's experiences with information systems: life and work in a community technology center , 2010, CHI.

[68]  Jameson M. Wetmore,et al.  Researching and Teaching the Ethics and Social Implications of Emerging Technologies in the Laboratory , 2009 .

[69]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Information use environments. , 1991 .

[70]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[71]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[72]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[73]  Rafael Capurro,et al.  Privacy. An Intercultural Perspective , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[74]  L. Winner.  The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .

[75]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Values congruence and differences between the interplay of personal and organizational value systems , 1993 .

[76]  Landon P. Cox,et al.  SmokeScreen: flexible privacy controls for presence-sharing , 2007, MobiSys '07.

[77]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Value Conflicts in Computational Modeling , 2010, Computer.

[78]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  From quality in use to value in the world , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[79]  D. MacKenzie.  An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets , 2006 .

[80]  Roger Bennett,et al.  Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity , 2003 .

[81]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Values in design , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[82]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Engineering Privacy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[83]  D. Ihde.  Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[84]  C. Batson,et al.  Prosocial Motives, Emotions, and Behavior: The Better Angels of Our Nature , 2015 .

[85]  Virginia R. Dominguez.  People As Subject, People As Object: Selfhood and Peoplehood in Contemporary Israel , 1989 .

[86]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  Privacy in Location-Aware Computing Environments , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[87]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Revising the Conceptualization of Computerization Movements , 2008, Inf. Soc..

[88]  James L. Spates.  The Sociology of Values , 1983 .

[89]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[90]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  CaseBuilder: A GUI Web App for building interactive teaching cases , 2011, ASIST.

[91]  Ping Wang,et al.  The role of innovation and wealth in the net neutrality debate: A content analysis of human values in congressional and FCC hearings , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[92]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[93]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[94]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[95]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  ‘Outlines of a World Coming into Existence’: Pervasive Computing and the Ethics of Forgetting , 2007 .

[96]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. , 2010 .

[97]  George A. Bekey,et al.  Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[98]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Ensuring transparency in computational modeling , 2009, CACM.

[99]  W. Davis.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 2012 .

[100]  Neil Pollock,et al.  The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation , 2010 .

[101]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[102]  B. Joerges.  Do Politics Have Artefacts? , 1999 .

[103]  Clifton F. Guthrie.  Digital Media Ethics , 2010, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[104]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Digital Libraries with Embedded Values: Combining Insights from LIS and Science and Technology Studies1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[105]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  (Whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long- distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context , 2011, CSCW.

[106]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[107]  D. Haraway,et al.  A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century , 2013 .

[108]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[109]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Enhancing independence and safety for blind and deaf-blind public transit riders , 2011, CHI.

[110]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  From Preemption to Circumvention: If Technology Regulates Why Do We Need Regulation (and Vice Versa)? , 2011 .