Who Pays for Content? Funding in Interactive Media

This study presents four models of funding for content in computer-mediated communication (CMC). These models emerge from analysis of 395 sites on the World Wide Web (Web). Key factors underlying the models are interactivity, ideologies related to intellectual property, and audience size. Relationships between these factors and funding of sites were tested by examining data collected through both content analysis of Web sites and surveys of individuals who manage the creation of content at those sites. The data reported in this study indicate that multiple funding models can co-exist in the current CMC environment. These include content that supports organizational objectives in Sales and Promotion sites, pre-packed information and entertainment in Sponsored Content sites, a wealth of information in Public Information sites, and content provided by individuals and non-profit groups in Community Content sites. However, the future infrastructure of CMC may play a major role in the funding of content. If systems of the future significantly increase the cost of developing and/or receiving content, the diversity of CMC could be lost. Public Information and Community Content sites may become too costly to maintain and commercial voices may gain dominance in Sales and Promotion and Sponsored Content sites. Thus, responsible public decisions should be made in the public sphere about how future CMC infrastructures are to be financed.

[1]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Computers, Networks and Work. , 1991 .

[2]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems , 1996 .

[3]  D. North Structure and Change in Economic History , 1983 .

[4]  C Jones,et al.  The great chain of buying: medical advertisement, the bourgeois public sphere, and the origins of the French Revolution. , 1996, The American historical review.

[5]  Clifford Stoll,et al.  Silicon Snake Oil: Second Thoughts on the Information Highway , 1995 .

[6]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Giuseppe Mantovani,et al.  Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically Apt to Enhance Democracy in Organizations? , 1994 .

[8]  Thomas Shaw,et al.  The effects of computer mediated interactivity on idea generation: an experimental investigation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  Ronald Valentin Bettig The impact of new communications technology on filmed-entertainment copyrights , 1989 .

[10]  J. Beniger Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo-Community , 1987 .

[11]  Patrali Chatterjee,et al.  Commercial Scenarios for the Web: Opportunities and Challenges , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[13]  J. Webster,et al.  Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1992 .

[14]  J. M. Kayany,et al.  Relational Control and Interactive Media Choice in Technology-Mediated Communication Situations. , 1996 .

[15]  R. Rice,et al.  Communication Research and the New Media Technologies , 1983 .

[16]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Nightly@nbc.com: Audience Scope and the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. , 1995 .

[17]  J. Lyle,et al.  Communication, Media and Change , 1992 .

[18]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Will the disadvantaged ride the information highway? Hopeful answers from a computer‐based health crisis system , 1996 .

[19]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Media use in the information age : emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use , 1989 .

[20]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[21]  D. Smythe Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism , 1977 .

[22]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[23]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[24]  Soon Ang,et al.  Panel Analysis of Feedback-Seeking Patterns in Face-to-Face, Computer-Mediated, and Computer-Generated Communication Environments , 1994 .

[25]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work , 1994, TOIS.

[26]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  The effects of progressive interactivity on learning from interactive video , 1986 .

[27]  Rudy Bretz,et al.  Media for Interactive Communication , 1983 .

[28]  J. Walther Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .