Investigations of upper extremity visuomotor control performance measures

The need to characterize upper-extremity performance is prompted by significant clinical as well as industrial applications. A performance measurement strategy based on engineering principles is described. Measures of movement speed, reaction speed, and coordination are obtained with a computer-based tracking task protocol to complement strength and range of motion measures. Proposed measures were evaluated in distinct studies. The first study, aimed at evaluating the stability and the discrimination power of seven initial measures, involved 165 normal and 32 Parkinson patients and was carried out over a period of five years. Based on a need for further performance characterization, five additional measures were developed. A second study, involving 15 normal subjects, was conducted to investigate both short and long term reliability for an expanded set of measures. Results of these studies demonstrate effective quantification of performance in both normal subjects and Parkinson patients and document reliability and discriminatory power of the measures. Measurands are discussed with regard to their interpretation in general human-task interface situations.<<ETX>>

[1]  Doubler Ja,et al.  An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. , 1984 .

[2]  George V. Kondraske,et al.  A Computer-Based System for Automated Quantitation of Neurologic Function , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  M. Hollander,et al.  Hand-eye coordination: The role of “motor memory” , 1973 .

[4]  Childress Ds,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984 .

[5]  R. D. Jones,et al.  Measurement of integrated sensory-motor function following brain damage by a computerized preview tracking task. , 1981, International rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  D. Childress,et al.  An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  E A FLEISHMAN,et al.  Testing for psychomotor abilities by means of apparatus tests. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  R W Pew,et al.  Simulated activities of daily living examination. , 1972, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  R W Angel,et al.  Transfer of information from manual to oculomotor control system. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  A. H. Norris,et al.  Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[11]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.