Attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer

Editor—The localisation of the two breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 made possible the use of mutation detection as a susceptibility test for people who wish to learn whether they carry a risk conferring mutation.1-4 Several studies have assessed attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility,5-11 most of which involved either community samples or women with just one first degree relative with breast cancer. The objective of our study was to assess attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in a large sample of women at high risk of developing hereditary breast cancer on the basis of family history. The majority of women included in our sample (80%) had a family history consistent with a dominantly inherited predisposition to breast cancer (lifetime risk of 1 in 4 to 1 in 2),12 and the remainder (20%) was at moderately increased risk of developing breast cancer (lifetime risk of 1 in 8 to 1 in 4).12 The findings reported here are based on a sample of 461 unaffected women with a family history of breast cancer. Women who approached one of 14 familial cancer clinics and six associated outreach clinics in five Australian states between November 1996 and January 1999 were eligible for participation. Women were considered ineligible for study participation if they had a previous diagnosis of ovarian or breast cancer, were unable to give informed consent, or had limited literacy in English, since data were collected using self-report questionnaires. The study was approved by 16 institutional ethics committees. Familial cancer clinic staff invited women to participate in the study during the preclinic telephone call, where possible. Questionnaires, consent forms, and reply paid envelopes were then mailed out by the coordinating research centre. Women were subsequently telephoned by the central research staff …

[1]  B. Trock,et al.  BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  D. Easton,et al.  Psychosocial impact of testing (by linkage) for the BRCA1 breast cancer gene: An investigation of two families in the research setting , 1996 .

[3]  R. Croyle,et al.  Interest in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: cognitive and emotional correlates. , 1993, Preventive medicine.

[4]  D. Easton,et al.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[6]  D. Easton,et al.  Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers , 1994, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Andrykowski,et al.  Interest in learning of personal genetic risk for cancer: a general population survey. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[8]  Y. Bignon,et al.  Attitudes towards cancer predictive testing and transmission of information to the family. , 1996, Journal of medical genetics.

[9]  D. Bentley,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1995, Nature.

[10]  M J Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: a cross-validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes. , 1982, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  Suzanne M. Miller Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. , 1987 .

[13]  B. Rimer,et al.  Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want? , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  P. Tonin,et al.  A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results , 1997, Cancer.

[15]  S. Seal,et al.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. , 1994, Science.

[16]  M. Daly,et al.  Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  R H Myers,et al.  Attitudes toward presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease. , 1987, American journal of medical genetics.

[18]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[19]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[20]  J. Benkendorf,et al.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  J. Struewing,et al.  Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[22]  P. Engstrom,et al.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  M. King,et al.  Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. , 1990, Science.

[24]  C. Lerman,et al.  Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[25]  J. Cassiman,et al.  Attitudes towards predictive testing in Huntington's disease: a recent survey in Belgium. , 1987, Journal of medical genetics.

[26]  W J Hall,et al.  Women's receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[27]  M. Frontali,et al.  Attitudes of persons at risk and their partners toward predictive testing. , 1992, Birth defects original article series.

[28]  S. Narod,et al.  What you don't know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Kenneth Offit,et al.  Decision-Making About Genetic Testing Among Women at Familial Risk for Breast Cancer , 1997, Psychosomatic medicine.

[30]  D. F. Easton,et al.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: Results from 214 families , 1993 .

[31]  K. Demyttenaere,et al.  Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: risk perception, reasons for testing and psychological profile of test applicants. , 1995, Genetic counseling.