China's 1 km Merged Gauge, Radar and Satellite Experimental Precipitation Dataset

Based on high-density gauge precipitation observations, high-resolution weather radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) and seamless satellite-based precipitation estimates, a 1-km experimental gauge-radar-satellite merged precipitation dataset has been developed using the proposed local gauge correction (LGC) and optimal interpolation (OI) merging strategies. First, hourly precipitation analyses from approximately 40,000 automatic weather stations at 0.01° resolution were used to correct bias in the radar QPE Group System (QPEGS), developed by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) and the Climate Prediction Center Morphing (CMORPH) precipitation products. As precipitation events tend to have a more localized distribution at the hourly and 0.01° resolutions, three core parameters were improved using the OI method. (a) The spatial dependence of the error variance for radar QPE was accounted for over six sub-regions in China and is shown as a non-linear function of the gauge precipitation analysis. (b) The spatial dependence of error correlation for the radar QPE decreased exponentially with distance. (c) The error of the hourly gauge-based precipitation analysis was quantified as a function of the precipitation amount and the gauge network density, using the Monte Carlo method to randomly sample the gauge observations over the dense gauge network. The performance of the 1-km experimental gauge-radar-satellite merged precipitation dataset (named as China Merged Precipitation Analysis: CMPA_1km) was assessed at 6 h-temporal resolutions and 0.03° × 0.03° spatial resolution using precipitation observations from 208 independent hydrological stations as a reference. Compared with radar QPE and CMORPH, the CMPA-1km showed obviously better accuracy in all sub-regions and during all seasons. In contrast, gauge analysis and CMPA-1km shared similar accuracy, but the latter could estimate heavy precipitation more accurately than the former, as well as the latter has the advantage of seamless spatial coverage. However, the CMPA-1km exhibits larger uncertainty during the cold season compared to the warm season, which will need further improvement in future work. The downscaled bias-corrected 0.01° resolution CMORPH was employed to fill the gaps in regions, mainly in Western China and the Tibetan Plateau, where gauge and radar measurements are limited.

[1]  R. Lin,et al.  Reprocessed, Bias-Corrected CMORPH Global High-Resolution Precipitation Estimates from 1998 , 2017 .

[2]  Xiangde Xu,et al.  Regional characteristics of the interdecadal turning of winter/summer climate modes in Chinese mainland , 2007 .

[3]  Yudong Tian,et al.  Modeling errors in daily precipitation measurements: Additive or multiplicative? , 2013 .

[4]  Yan Shen,et al.  A high spatiotemporal gauge‐satellite merged precipitation analysis over China , 2014 .

[5]  Jay P. Breidenbach,et al.  Real-Time Correction of Spatially Nonuniform Bias in Radar Rainfall Data Using Rain Gauge Measurements , 2002 .

[6]  Giulia Panegrossi,et al.  Passive Microwave Rainfall Error Analysis Using High-Resolution X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations in Complex Terrain , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Shiguang Xu,et al.  Tracing the Source of the Errors in Hourly IMERG Using a Decomposition Evaluation Scheme , 2016 .

[8]  Y. Hong,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of five satellite-based precipitation products and evaluation of three optimally merged multi-algorithm products over the Tibetan Plateau , 2014 .

[9]  Yang Hong,et al.  Can Near-Real-Time Satellite Precipitation Products Capture Rainstorms and Guide Flood Warning for the 2016 Summer in South China? , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[10]  G. Villarini,et al.  Product-Error-Driven Uncertainty Model for Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation with NEXRAD Data , 2007 .

[11]  Steven L. Mullen,et al.  Spatiotemporal Variability of Hourly Precipitation over the Eastern Contiguous United States from Stage IV Multisensor Analyses , 2008 .

[12]  Y. Hong,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of satellite precipitation estimation and Monte Carlo assessment of the error propagation into hydrologic response , 2004 .

[13]  Chen Zhe,et al.  Quality Control Procedures for Hourly Precipitation Data from Automatic Weather Stations in China , 2010 .

[14]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Correcting of real-time radar rainfall bias using a Kalman filtering approach , 2006 .

[15]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[16]  D. Kitzmiller,et al.  Evaluation of Radar Precipitation Estimates from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System and the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing System over the Conterminous United States , 2012 .

[17]  Yudong Tian,et al.  Real-Time Bias Reduction for Satellite-Based Precipitation Estimates , 2010 .

[18]  Pingping Xie,et al.  A conceptual model for constructing high‐resolution gauge‐satellite merged precipitation analyses , 2011 .

[19]  Emmanouil N. Anagnostou,et al.  Satellite Rainfall Error Analysis with the Use of High-Resolution X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations Over the Italian Alps , 2017 .

[20]  Yan Shen,et al.  Validation and comparison of a new gauge‐based precipitation analysis over mainland China , 2016 .

[21]  Jian Zhang,et al.  National mosaic and multi-sensor QPE (NMQ) system description, results, and future plans , 2011 .

[22]  A. Hou,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2014 .

[23]  P. Xie,et al.  Performance of high‐resolution satellite precipitation products over China , 2010 .

[24]  V. Kousky,et al.  Assessing objective techniques for gauge‐based analyses of global daily precipitation , 2008 .

[25]  J. Janowiak,et al.  CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2004 .

[26]  G. Huffman,et al.  The TRMM Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) , 2010 .

[27]  Jeff W. Brogden,et al.  Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) Quantitative Precipitation Estimation: Initial Operating Capabilities , 2016 .

[28]  Herbert B. Osborn,et al.  Reciprocal-Distance Estimate of Point Rainfall , 1980 .

[29]  L. Gandin.  Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields , 1963 .

[30]  P. Xie,et al.  A Gauge-Based Analysis of Daily Precipitation over East Asia , 2007 .

[31]  J. Janowiak,et al.  COMPARISON OF NEAR-REAL-TIME PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES FROM SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS AND NUMERICAL MODELS , 2007 .

[32]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Estimation of the mean field bias of radar rainfall estimates , 1991 .

[33]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[34]  J. Röttger,et al.  Radar observations of the lower and middle atmosphere , 1997 .

[35]  A. Hou.  The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission: An Overview , 2006 .