‘MEAN+R’: implementing a web-based, multi-participant decision support system using the prevalent MEAN architecture with R based on a revised intuitionistic-fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making model

This study proposes the novel idea of implementing a decision support system (DSS) based on both the prevalent MEAN architecture and the R statistical language platform. A ‘MEAN+R’ framework is defined, and the effectiveness of this framework is verified by taking it as the basis for the implementation of a real user-side, web-based, multi-participant DSS supporting a group decision-making process of quasi-senior people, pertaining to the selection of the best and commonly-agreed senior center for co-living after retirement. The ‘model base’ of the DSS is a recent MADM model evaluating the criteria-wise source opinions of the decision makers (DMs) toward alternatives in terms of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs), but within the model the original multi-objective decision-making (MODM) phase to determine whether the criteria weight vector (CWV) has been replaced with another well-accepted MADM model, which is the AHP. This ensures not only unified grounds for modelling, but also a coherent implementation basis for the MADM model in R. The outside Node.js programs access the ‘data base’ of the DSS managed using MongoDB and will invoke the R-written ‘model base’ codes while necessary. Then, the R program also interacts with the ‘data base’ to exchange the information relevant to the decision from/to users. An illustrative numerical group decision example supported by this DSS is provided, and an efficiency analysis is made by listing the time spent on both data and model bases separately and clearly, while excluding the other processes of the DSS. A key finding is that the computational time can be controlled when incorporating the vector-based R platform, i.e., it leaps forward to the next level only when the size of the problem increases to a certain extent. Finally, since the realized DSS is intended to face end users of the healthcare system (rather than the business-oriented service providers, e.g., hospitals, physicians, nurses, etc.), it may provide some supplement to healthcare decision support (rather than solving other types of problem, such as clinical decisions).

[1]  Rommel N. Carvalho,et al.  Applying clustering and AHP methods for evaluating suspect healthcare claims , 2017, J. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Sonia Giovinazzi,et al.  A group-AHP decision analysis for the selection of applied fire protection to steel structures , 2016 .

[3]  Paul Gray,et al.  Group decision support systems , 1987, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Yong Deng,et al.  Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on AHP , 2017 .

[5]  Ali Kokangül,et al.  A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies , 2017 .

[6]  S. S. Al Sharif,et al.  A 0-1 goal programming model for nurse scheduling , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Jarno Tuimala,et al.  R, Programming Language , 2013 .

[8]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Decision Making in Construction Management: AHP and Expert Choice Approach , 2017 .

[9]  Gang Kou,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making with generalized fuzzy numbers , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  S. Chandra Mohan,et al.  Decision Support System in Healthcare Industry , 2011 .

[11]  Beverly Ann Beisgen,et al.  Senior Centers: Opportunities For Successful Aging , 2002 .

[12]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  DSS Architecture and Types , 2008 .

[13]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[15]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  An integrated decision support system based on ANN and Fuzzy_AHP for heart failure risk prediction , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Zheng-Yun Zhuang,et al.  Solving an outpatient nurse scheduling problem by binary goal programming , 2014 .

[17]  Julia Szulecka,et al.  Forest plantations in Paraguay: Historical developments and a critical diagnosis in a SWOT-AHP framework , 2017 .

[18]  Vijay Nehra,et al.  Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India , 2017 .

[19]  Jun Ye,et al.  Multiple attribute group decision-making methods with unknown weights in intuitionistic fuzzy setting and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy setting , 2013, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[20]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[21]  Suihuai Yu,et al.  A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality , 2017 .

[22]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[23]  Vipul Jain,et al.  Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..